What is replacement theory and what is its end goal?

Its supposed to be some evil genius plan, but it works out like this:

a1c.gif
 
I'm curious to know what it is that I wrote, specifically, that you disagree with and why, given that you posed the OP.
I disagreed with your post because of your faggoty white savior complex that sounds like something out of /pol/.

Also I don’t know what shitty food and declining fertility has to do with white replacement. If you’re seriously hinting that Jews are intentionally poisoning our food to make white people infertile whilst importing brownskins, you’re nuts.
 
white people being replaced by other minority groups, but is there more to it than that? What is the end goal of said replacement theory? I don’t completely understand the topic so I would love some clarification.
Here’s what I think: it’s not necessary about race to our leaders. They just really like people who are completely reliant on the government. (This applies to really any western country.)

When a low-prosperity migrant enters a country, they are completely reliant on government assistance to survive. The pathway towards independence and prosperity includes an economic filter that’s designed to disincentivize ever abandoning government dependence. It’s actually sparked an in interesting discussion here in the King Cobra JFS thread.

The end goal is to “fortify elections” by guaranteeing votes. If the dependent electorate ever votes the “wrong way” and an opposition party gets in, you can slowly squeeze the drip feed of benefits as punishment.
 
/pol/gans making this a jews-vs-pagans issue even doe jews collaborated with the pagans in Rome to persecute Christians for nearly 400 years, with zoroastrians in Persia for nearly 600, with mudslimes in the Islamic world for nearly 1300, with Norsemen (through trade and economic advisory) for around 300-500, and with the Soviets (even doe the bolshies backstabbed them HARD) for 75.

Jews didn't give a single flying fuck about whites until Alexander pimpslapped Darius into River Styx, and their hatred toward Europeans only solidified after the continent became Christian. Without Christianity, I doubt kikoids would even have the same level of animosity toward Europe as they do now.
 
Also I don’t know what shitty food and declining fertility has to do with white replacement.
C'mon.

If you’re seriously hinting that Jews are intentionally poisoning our food to make white people infertile whilst importing brownskins, you’re nuts.
Close. The elites are making everyone infertile, not just whites, because population reduction is their explicitly stated policy goal.

There is no question about this. They speak about depopulation openly.

"A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Ted Turner, Founder of CNN

"In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."
Prince Philip

"We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren't enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage."
Mikhail Gorbachev, Last Leader of the Soviet Union

"In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."
Alexander King, Club of Rome co-founder and OECD Director-General

"Childbearing should be a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license. All potential parents should be required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing."
David R. Brower, Executive Director, Sierra Club

"At present the population of the world is increasing...War so far has had no great effect on this increase... I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others...If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation, survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full...the state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of it?
Bertrand Russell, The Impact of Science on Society

They don't have to 'put anything' in the food. The elites just allow the multinationals, which they own through companies like Blackrock and Vanguard, to use cheap and dangerous ingredients like BPA, BPS, and BPF.

OIP (30).jpeg

Lowered fertility is a consequence of corporate malfeasance and policy inaction. This is a desirable outcome for them.

Whites are a potential threat and power base that needs to be neutralized, and so white replacement is de facto policy, and has been since the Hart-Celler Immigration Act of 1965.

thumbnail-US-ImmNumberShare~2.png

I understand if you disagree with parts of my analysis (in regards to motives), but if you think population reduction and white replacement are not happening, given the overwhelming evidence, then you're the one that's nuts.
 
Last edited:
It's a book written by the Frenchman Renaud Camus. One of the most based homos on the planet.

And it is not really a theory. It's an observation that the native indigenous European populations are being replaced by imported non-natives all over Europe. Or maybe "displaced" is a better or more accurate term than "replaced".
 
It's not a theory. It's actually happening. This isn't some Boomer schizo conspiritard shit like Project Blue Beam. This is actually happening. White people in the US and the rest of the Western world are being replaced by shit skins. It's happening for several reasons and by many different groups. Politicians want the shit skin voter base. Shit skins are more willing to go along with their BS. The rich capitalist types are involved because they want the cheap legal and illegal labor. The government will just subsidize their shit skin slaves with government social programs known as bennies. They will pay them poverty wages while the government picks up the slack and covers the rest with social programs. The rich faggots will then spend that money on snorting designer coke off the ass cheeks of an overpriced European whore. Then there are the Jews. They just hate white European people and want them all eradicated. They only want to keep enough around to fight wars for them in the great sandbox in the Middle East. While everyone thinks Muslim sand niggers are Jews biggest enemies that's not completely true. White European people are. They will keep the Holohoax and ebil Nazi grift going to emotionally manipulate the dumb goy cattle into going along with their own extermination.

Then you have the economic factor. This is caused by all three groups. The politicians the capitalists and the Jews. By keeping the economies in the Western world in such a shit state with their Jewish globalism cheap foreign labor and the deindustrialization of the Western world white people can't afford to have kids anymore. That's just making the white genocide happen even faster.
 
Yeah as was pointed out earlier, the capacity of whites to compete is what is the problem for them.
I disagree with the assertion that jews (as a group) are trying to blindly outcompete an entire race. 99% of jews have zero power and the bulk of them are plain-jane panem et circenses types with next to no animosity for "da goyz".

If you wanna understand the kikoid brain, look at their history. They primarily went after Christianity for religious reasons. They were trying to placate their god. Fast forward 2000 years and they are still trying to placate their god; the only difference is that they no longer worship Yahweh. They worship mammon. If the replacement theory is real, and jewish billionnaires are indeed behind it, then they are primarilly doing it for financial reasons and to prevent their western first-world homelands from falling into economic decline (and thus losing all their precious shekels).

(Even doe gnostics are the ones really in charge thoughbiet)
 
I disagree with the assertion that jews (as a group) are trying to blindly outcompete an entire race
Then you should also disagree that germans as a group persecuted jews.
Most people in general have little direct conscious impact. Humans follow leaders. Leaders make choices.
But we also act in accordance with our nature. Jews vote for immigration into white nations because they understand this weakens the group solidarity. Part of this is organized, as the infamous potohk image showed, and part of it is just the sensible right choice for a jew living in the west. It may come at a cost for the host, but it is in his or her advantage.
If the replacement theory is real, and jewish billionnaires are indeed behind it, then they are primarilly doing it for financial reasons and to prevent their western first-world homelands from falling into economic decline (and thus losing all their precious shekels).
But the population decline is also by design. Look at things like the jaffe memo
 
Jews vote for immigration into white nations because they understand this weakens the group solidarity
Mass-importing muslims (who want to kill them), Chinese and Indians (who are much better merchants than they are), Eastern Europeans (who control somewhere between 30-40% of Wall Street now), and Africans (who also want to kill them) ruins their own group solidarity. Look I know jews are stupid, but going full Samson Option just to own whitey is ridiculous and assumes all of them are buttmad ideologues who want to oppress the gamers who follow redditor logic.

There are a lot of jews who hate the goyim. There are a lot of jews who are mere utopians. There are a lot of jews who just wanna make big bucks. I'll use the Frankfurt School for example: a good amount of them outright vocalized their hatred for Western society, many others simply wanted to see their vision of utopia implemented, and the rest were in it for the grift. The Frankfurt School was not one uniform group. It did not make any unilateral offensives against da goyim as a group. If a small subsection of the jewish race cannot even agree on a single esoteric ideology of racial conquest, then it cannot be assumed that jews, as a race, are driven by a grand plan to destroy the White race.

Similarily, the Germans, as a group, did not persecute the jews. The Nazi high command gave the orders and the individual members of the military arm of the Nazi movement carried out the acts. Not every Nazi was motivated by an ethnic agenda, not every Nazi participated in the persecution. Not every persecutor was a Nazi; jews persecuted other jews in Croatia and Ruthenia. The majority of the victims of the Holocaust weren't even jews; they were Slavs. If the Nazis weren't even united in the persecution of jews, then how could Germany, as a whole, be responsible?

Jaffe was a devil, but he was one man, and Planned Parenthood is one organization. A demonic one, sure, but not everyone working for the organization wanted to sacrifice babies to ba'al. Neither is it an organization that represents the interests of jews as a whole; merely Jaffe's faction.
 
Jaffe was a devil, but he was one man, and Planned Parenthood is one organization. A demonic one, sure, but not everyone working for the organization wanted to sacrifice babies to ba'al. Certainly not an organization that represents the imterests of jews as a whole; merely Jaffe's faction.
Who funded it and to what degree have the plans outlined in the jaffe memo come to fruition? You look at the creation of culture (hollywood and such) and it's not hard to see the many similarities between the stated plans and what came out of media after.

Similarily, the Germans, as a group, did not persecute the jews. The Nazi high command gave the orders and the individual members of the military arm of the Nazi movement carried out the acts. Not every Nazi was motivated by an ethnic agenda, not every Nazi participated in the persecution. Not every persecutor was a Nazi; jews persecuted other jews in Croatia and Ruthenia. The majority of the victims of the Holocaust weren't even jews; they were Slavs. If the Nazis weren't even united in the persecution of jews, then how could Germany, as a whole, be responsible?
With this logic no group is ever responsible if not every member of that group personally participated in every aspect of it. You are at least consistent, in that respect. I have a very different perspective. I consider the american government and by extension the american people to be responsible for the tuskegee experiments; not in so much as that everyone bears or should bear the guilt of it, but the responsibility to take action to prevent a repetition. Not every jewish person opened the gates of Toledo in spain to the muslim invaders, but broadly speaking it's the jews that did that. It makes sense to speak of individuals when you're talking about a specific crime, but I also think it makes sense to speak broadly and paint with broad brushes when speaking about larger events and their historical and political impact. I understand your perspective but I do not consider it a useful way of perceiving responsibility.

I don't see why you would need a complete support of a group or nation to name them as responsible.

Similarly when you name three different jewish interests, when each of these interests would mostly choose the same path in regards to the subject of migration replacement, it is really a distinction without difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Audit
Easy there is no plan these people literally thought that every single person is interchangeable there's a level of malice from your average brown person but the moronic average liberal leftist whatever doesn't even have any idea of the people who originally put this plan into motion mainly communist Jews and the other group is just people who don't wanna have to pay their employees a decent wage.
At one point these people had a plan but that's just a comforting thought there's 1000 different interests competing against each other at any given time we used to have a way of dealing with this it was called absolute monarchy the king would just smash most of these people's heads in when they got too uppity but we decided to create a system of dysfunction known as man and democracy well you can't remove the parasitic class by telling the king if he doesn't get his act together you're going to take his head instead you have 100,000
 
I don't see why you would need a complete support of a group or nation to name them as responsible
I don't trust jews and I don't need a justification to not trust them. They could all be bleeding heart humanitarians and I still wouldn't trust them. But that doesn't mean I can't examine them obsjectively for the sake of discussion.

I'm of the belief that no individual is responsible for the actions of his peers if he does not participate. I don't blame the entire jewish nation for the atrocities committed against Christians in Alexandria, I blame the mob who was responsible and their abhorent "religion".
 
There are a number of reasons why the great replacement is happening:

1. Business interests who want the population to grow as fast as possibly to maximize the pool of cutsomers and laborers,not to mention the willingness of shitholer immigrants to undercut civilized laborers when it comes to wages and working conditions.

2. Shitholer immigrants come from corrupt and dysfunctional countries and thus hold politicians and the government to lowers standards and are willing to put up with govermnet mismanagent to a greater degree than the civilized inidgenous population which benefits current and inept politicians in power:


The General Social Survey also found that immigrants trust American institutions — such as Congress, the Supreme Court, and the presidency — at much higher rates than native-born Americans do. Immigrants are injecting much-needed support for these institutions. Confidence in U.S. democratic institutions has been on the decline for several years. It is notable that immigrants who chose the United States have such a positive outlook on our government, particularly when the native-born attitudes are trending negatively.


3. Left wing-politicians and various shitholer ethnic/racial lobbies and interests groups (kikes,spics,hajis etc.) who want to grow their political influence by growing the population who is likely to politically support them.

4. General racial grievance and resentment held by aforementioned gorup against whites and the civilization they've built,primarily caused by a sense of envy and inferiority toward whites.
 
Last edited:
Yeah basically it’s just about creating an obedient class of consoomers that accept low pay, no rights, and not smart or ambitious enough to rock the boat. Forcing white people to be at the same level as the others also appeals to the elite’s megalomaniacal instincts of not just obsession with micromanaging people but being worshiped and revered. They want nothing more than to be the ones that end racism, which they believe to be the worst thing ever. There’s nothing guys like Bill Gates want more than a bronze statue of themselves up at a place like Harare or Nairobi where heccin’ blacks can worship them as the ones that saved black people from racism.
 
Our ruling class in the United States, and the ruling classes all across the Western world, have no reason to think more than 5 minutes into the future. (Note: climate change is an exception, but they use it to their advantage today.) They don't care about anything that isn't affecting them now or won't affect their short careers in office. Once they're out, they know they won't be blamed for the damage they do.

What's happening is population levels are falling in the developed world, and the Ponzi scheme economic policies both the left and the right are always pushing are eventually going to collapse and take away their easy lives of graft at best. Both political poles think they can probably blame the other side and get away with it when the time comes, but that's not a sure thing, so they need some sort of plan to keep the grift going. It would be best to prop up the system as it is now.

The greatest expenditure of the American taxpayer is "entitlements" above even military spending. It is politically impossible to cut entitlements for either party, so the only political option is to keep the scheme going. It's also virtually impossible to reduce government spending in general. The only way to pay for all this is to have enough taxpayers to bilk in order to hand that money to the eternally growing class of parasites (illegals and government workers), but Westerners aren't having kids anymore because we live in a fucked up Rat Utopia experiment environment. So the easiest solution is to import people who are having kids so we end up with taxpayers to keep the scheme going.

Forget that this makes no sense because politicians are, essentially, bringing people in illegally to live as parasites. "That will work out in time, " they think. Forget that the cultures of the people they're letting in illegally are incompatible with the Western nations they're coming into. "What's culture got to do with it?" they think. "It's about numbers. And aren't we multicultural societies, after all?" Politicians only think 5 minutes ahead (to the end of their careers/lives), they're used to being terrible at their jobs and getting rewarded anyway (they would be in the private sector otherwise), and they successfully spin and fudge results all the time. They and their families will be fine no matter what happens, no matter how the culture shifts.

The political class is almost exclusively scum, but most of them don't hate you. They're like everyone else in that they don't know you exist and won't give a fuck when you die. They're probably more like that than the average person. But, yes, they are trying to replace you. With people who will shit out future tax cattle while demanding more welfare and an even bigger military empire.
 
Probably repeating what others have said, but the reasons are variable:

  1. Jews have written extensively and publicly on how they believe an ethnically homogeneous society can only ever end in genocide for them. The TL;DR is they think Hitler is an inevitability in any nation state, not a unique individual in a unique historical moment. The notable lack of Hitlers anywhere except WW2 Germany does not dissuade them. They are very aware they've been kicked out of 109 countries, definitely believe it's never been their fault, and have observed they climb to the top most easily in cosmopolitan, imperial cities where no minority can gain an upper hand on its own. They want the entire world to become New York City.

  2. Ultra-woke leftists believe that all difference in wealth is born of oppression, and since white societies are more prosperous, safer, and productive than all others, clearly, we have stolen the birthright of the "BIPOC," and the only remedy is to bring them all here.

  3. Wealthy businessmen are annoyed at how much the domestic population expects to be paid and see nothing but green when illegal aliens flood over the border.

  4. The right to coom, the most sacred of all rights, has eventually produced a society where nobody has children. One in three women in America are childless now. We need immigration to keep that line going up!

  5. The ultra-elite believe that Third World nations can be managed (by them) into First World nations, but in the mean time, as they say, "talent is distributed equally, but opportunity is not" (an objectively and measurably false statement), so they believe untold riches and progress are being denied them by not bringing a billion Africans to America and Europe. They really do think those migrant boats are full of future doctors and engineers.
Jews didn't give a single flying fuck about whites until Alexander pimpslapped Darius into River Styx, and their hatred toward Europeans only solidified after the continent became Christian. Without Christianity, I doubt kikoids would even have the same level of animosity toward Europe as they do now.

Nah, without Christianity, between Alexander's defiling of the Temple and Titus' destruction of it , their hatred for Europeans would be everlasting.
 
Back