What is the most wrongthink book you've ever read?

[ToroidalBoat]

Could Kiwi Farms count as a book?

 

[Rebel Wilson]

I actually think The Manipulated Male by Esther Villar is simultaneously the most misogynistic book and the most misandrist book I've ever read. Manages to make both sexes look terrible.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

I actually think The Manipulated Male by Ether Villar is simultaneously the most misogynistic book and the most misandrist book I've ever read. Manages to make both sexes look like terrible.

I never did read it. From the interview I thought it'd be a fairly balanced and accurate book, if piercing through commonplace myths.

Something on the level of Cassie Jaye's "the red pill" documentary.

 

[macrodegenerate]

Mein Kampf. I recommend the Ford translation. Whether you want to take a stand for or against fascism you should really read that book first. It could change your mind.

The Ford translation is good, I have an audiobook of it which I used to listen to on the way into work while carpooling.

The thing about mein kampf is that I've never really heard someone express so simply how unchecked economic engines destroy a nations people and inevitably the nation state upon which it subsists. Keep in mind this is only a small section of a chapter in the book, and not the main focus, but it hit me out of nowhere.

 

[Ughubughughughughughghlug]

I read A Call for Economic Nationalism by Sacco and Vanzetti Vandal, two douchebags that based their names on Italian anarchists Sacco and Vanzetti and segregationist terrorist Byron de la Vandal (classy /sarc). It was trash.

I read The Camp of the Saints. Fascinating book - from a literary point of view, extremely good/haunting, and prophetic in its depiction of things like the migrant caravans and Western cuckery - but also appalling, hateful in a visceral way.

I read White Girl Bleed a Lot, it's argument isn't anything fundamentally different from what conservatives say but the dude does not make any effort whatsoever to prove his Not-Racist bonafides or give a single shit about helping muh Blacks. That, and the nature of his claim (not just Blacks cause a lot of crime, but that they frequently pogrom Whites and it's covered up), makes it way out there compared to normalfaggot conservative material even though it's not supremacist or ethnonationalist in any way. The book is unfortunately shit, he has tons of valid examples but he also has tons of instances of regular criminality, crimes not even directed against Whites, and other such cluttering it up and giving the whole thing a histrionic tone.

 

[wtfNeedSignUp]

Death of the West is pretty much what every right wing YouTuber based his opinions on for the last decade, so it's the most wrongthink book by popularity alone.

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

A lot of good ones mentioned so I’ll bring up ones not mentioned.

Blood Passover by Ariel Toaff. The premise is that sacrificing children for their blood to be used in Passover rituals did happen amongst extremist sects of Ashkenazim. Mainstream Jewish publications screeched about it but low key Jewish historians basically said “It’s true…but he shouldn’t say it anyway.” Toaff was temporarily pressured into denouncing his own book but recanted shortly after. Bootleg translations are available even on Amazon but I think it’s because it’s such a low key book and it was released in 2007, before censorship became a regular thing.

The Jewish Mafia by Herve Ryssen. It covers the various bits of criminality the tribe gets into. There was a time, even as late as the 90s, when Jews took pride in guys like Meyer Lansky. Now it’s anuddah shoah to bring it up because he was just a poor oppressed boychik who had “no choice” to be a powerful gangster who very likely collaborated with the feds. Using sources from Jews themselves, you have to special order the translation of this book. They have a big section dedicated to the flesh trade which will get your blood boiling. Independent research from places like amnesty international will back those claims up. Ryssen is a holocaust denier, which is something I care zero about. Fortunately that is not covered in the book.

 

[ChampFantana]

Mein Kampf- I'm due for a re-read cause I haven't read it since high school.

The Turner Diaries- Utopian fantasy at it's finest. Still presents a lot of hard truths about blacks and their nature.


The Unabomber Manifesto- Should be considered required reading for any dissident/radical right winger.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Could Kiwi Farms count as a book?

Does sugar count as a healthy snack?

 

[George Floyd Sneed]

Missed a couple other good ones:

The Thirteenth Tribe by Arthur Koestler. This is the history of Khazaria, a short lived kingdom that existed in modern day Ukraine and Russia. Basically this kingdom mass converted to Judaism out of a sense of preservation to hold off the Christians to the west and Muslims to the south. Khazaria was the kingdom of big brained centrists who were fence sitters. Khazaria declined after a couple centuries and the Mongols finished the job. This book is considered controversial because it meant a large percentage of Jews weren’t from Israel after all and it was published in 1973, right when Israel sovereignty was being challenged by the Arabs. Koestler hoped the book would end antisemitism but instead it was treated like anuddah shoah. Which leads to…

The Invention of the Jewish People by Shlomo Sand. Sand asserts with lots of evidence that Koestler’s claims were not only accurate but that most Jews’ DNA is similar to the goyische that they reside by. Johns Hopkins released a study around 2012 that was meant to prove once and for all that all Jews came from Israel. When that study was found not to be the case, it was memoryholed. You can still find some kvetching about it here and there.

Why does it matter? It really doesn’t. Nobody cares that a random Jew shares more DNA from Germany than Judaea. But Jews do care because a number of them claim that Israel is their homeland but have taken it to such an autistic degree that they refuse to admit their blood and DNA is any different now than 2,000, which is absurd but that’s the chosenites for you.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Why does it matter? It really doesn’t.

Of course genes matter.

 

[Blobby's Murder Knife]

Up From Slavery - Booker T. Washington

This was a black man writing about he hated niggerculture from the very beginning. He wrote how he hated racegrifters, both black and white. He wrote that if black people avoided racegrifters and just concentrated on not being niggers, they could, indeed, not be niggers. Obviously no one listened to him and the book completely memoryholed because it didn't fit the narrative.

 

[God of Nothing]

I actually think The Manipulated Male by Esther Villar is simultaneously the most misogynistic book and the most misandrist book I've ever read. Manages to make both sexes look terrible.

it being written by a woman is the most based thing

 

[pork and beans]

SCUM MANIFESTO by valerie solanas. Misandric text from a literal schizo woman malding about everybody. You see men hating on ladies as cope all time but here its the other way around. She doesnt make any good points and its not good but its very short so its worth a read. It has some good edgy quotes.

 

[Haint]

The Book of Lies by Alister Crowley. Its mostly his explanation of Tarot. Its esoteric as fuck, just to get through one page takes alot research into antiquity and various obscure myths and legends. Someday I will finish it, but its work to get through. Harder to read than Mein Kampf.

The Turner Diaries.

Guy in one my univesity classes had a habit of texting me passages from The Turner Diaries, unsolicited. I dont know if he was sending those to anybody else. Entertaining, but kind of weird to have that texted to you randomly at 2AM.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

SCUM MANIFESTO by valerie solanas. Misandric text from a literal schizo woman malding about everybody. You see men hating on ladies as cope all time but here its the other way around. She doesnt make any good points and its not good but its very short so its worth a read. It has some good edgy quotes.

Sounds like reading Andrea Dworkin and hearing arguments laid out why every penis in vagina sex is rape by definition.

 

[Candlelight Desolation]

The four that come to mind:

• Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler: Interestingly enough, probably the most tame book on this list. Hitler's autobiography and manifesto he dictated to someone while he was in prison after the Beer Hall Putsch (you can tell he didn't actually write it; the "writing style" feels like someone talking to someone else who is transcribing what is being said). People hype this book up as the most intense and hateful thing ever written, but it's not. It's nothing compared to something ironically less controversial like The Rape of Nanking.
• The Fate of Empires by Sir John Glubb: Brief but very right wing political essay written by a man of the British Empire. Glubb's thesis is that all empires and world superpowers in history last an average of 250 years before they fall, and the final stages of an empire's lifespan comprise of what Glubb calls the "Age of Decadence" where common themes are laxity of sexual morals, indifference to religion and traditional values, foreigners overrunning the host nation's population, and mass introduction of women into public life. This book was actually pulled from Amazon some years ago.
• The Death of the West by Pat Buchanan: Piggybacking off of the last entry in the list, this book is very similar to The Fate of Empires, though both authors lived decades apart in different parts of the world. Regardless, the ideologies line up perfectly. Buchanan talks about almost identically what Glubb talks about, though it's from the perspective of the United States.
• The History of Jihad by Robert Spencer: Anti-Islam book that talks about the religion's bloodstained history. It also talks about Islamic history in their invasions into Europe through Iberia and Greece. The book was published in the late 2010's, and along with modern Islamic violence like 9/11, it talks about mass migrant rape attacks in Europe as well.

 

[pork and beans]

Sounds like reading Andrea Dworkin and hearing arguments laid out why every penis in vagina sex is rape by definition.

Eh, andrea dworkin sort of tries to make her ideas look like reasoning and arguments, so its way more boring.
She’ll try to use big boy words to sound tecnhical, objective and smart.
Plus she has so many books. Ive read like three or four and i can’t remember which is which. Not all of them are equally bad. “Right wing women” had an ok critique of the sex liberation movement of the 60s.

Valerie solanas never gives justifications to her extremist claims nor does she ever sugarcoat them, because she doesnt care about driving away a potential audience or looking crazy.
She bares her truth out like a faulty prophet with the utmost seriousness, even though what shes saying is so clearly wrong. Well… not ALL that she says- look at what she has to say about trannies LOL:

When the male accepts his passivity, defines himself as a woman and becomes a transvestite he loses his desire to screw (or to do anything else, for that he fulfills himself as a drag queen) and
gets his cock chopped off.

 

[DDR Yoga]

My naughtiest reads have all been mentioned already.

Teddy K's manifesto is nothing short of brilliant. It's still one of the best things I've ever read and it turned me on to writers such as Linkola, Zerzan and Ellul.

The Blank Slate is an interesting read too. Pinker is an excellent and concise writer and, even though he shirked the race question, there's still enough in there that would see him completely unpersoned if it were released today.

The Turner Diaries reads like cheap pulp fiction to be honest. Pierce definitely wasn't a prose stylist but it's still worth a read if for no other reason than its infamy.

Imperium was a bit heavy for my tastes and it's obviously a bit outdated. I didn't really enjoy it.

Also worth a mention...

Jane Goodall's In The Shadow Of Man. It makes no political statement in and of itself but it's a thorough investigation of the behaviour and nature of our closest cousins. A very good read.

 

[Eydallur]

The Bell Curve is breddy gud