Besides Tibetans and Uyghurs, there are no minorities actively suppressed by the CCP (and Tibetans face nowhere near as much suppression as the Uyghurs do) and the CCP is full of minority politicians. "National socialism" is a good descriptor for China, but to call China akin to Nazi Germany is a complete distortion.
Besides Jews, Poles, Slavs and Gypsies, there were no minorities actively suppressed by the National Socialists. They were actually much nicer to African blacks than Americans were, and openly courted the Arab Muslims.
What have the Romans ever done for us? What the hell difference does that make? Am I being unfair to the Chinese communists because National Socialists killed people in their vans using carbon monoxide, while the CCP uses more refined methods with their death vans so they can harvest the parts and sell them?
China is more civic nationalist than ethnosupremacist, and in their civic nationalism they are determined to achieve economic subjugation of the world rather than the globalist national self-hatred promoted as state ideology in the US and EU.
Again, Chinese socialists are as nationalist and as fascist as the National Socialists of Germany were. Like the National Socialists and Bolshevik socialists, they are motivated by petty greed and are terribly unscrupulous and opportunistic, mainly grabbing at whatever is easy and nearby. They also develop outrageous and often absurd justifications for what they do. Remember that socialists are criminals who primarily want to steal, and so seek out whosoever might have wealth that they may procure as easily as possible. National Socialists believed Jews were both a lucrative resource and easy meat, and likewise considered them a potential threat. The communist Chinese feel the same way about Uighurs, and with similar results. So also the Bolsheviks in regards the Ukrainians. And so on.
Globalist national self-hatred is promoted by the Left fascists as state ideology in the US and EU. Once they did it in service to the Bolsheviks (as well as the National Socialists during their 1939-41 alliance; see the American Student Union during this period). Since 1990 they've been doing it in service to the CCP. The real problem is allowing Left fascists to infiltrate political and educational institutions and influence social and political policy in the West.
BTW is this the same "Bolshevik Empire" which was led mainly by Jews until an ethnic Georgian purged them all, and then was subsequently headed by a Ukrainian who reversed the genocidal deportations ordered by said Georgian, and then another Ukrainian headed the country for 18 years and let it stagnate? I'm getting a little skeptical about your grasp on history and ethnicity.
The Bolshevik Empire was led by a Russian, then a Georgian Russiaboo, then a Ukrainian Russiaboo, and then a Russian Russiaboo. Racist bigotry, anti-Semitism and above all bald-faced hypocrisy are staples of socialist regimes. Thus, for example, why Jews were welcomed into the Bolshevik Party and then in general exterminated after they had served their purpose. Thus why so many Jews sought to escape Russia in 1972, as part of the Aliyah program (and why so many Ukrainians pretended to be Jews so they could escape as well).
Unlike the Swiss, the average Tibetan still lived a medieval lifestyle before the CCP built roads and invested in the region's natural resources.
The Chinese communists built roads to get at the region's natural resources, not to help the Tibetans. They're extending their Belt and Road Network to Nepal for similar reasons.
Putin is of course correct regarding the Nazi presence in the Ukraine given the veneration of Stepan Bandera and other Nazis, the prevelence of Nazi symbology like swastikas and the Black Sun, and the CIA-installed current Ukrainian government's origins in Ukrainian Nazis the CIA helped escape after 1945 to use as tools against the USSR.
There are most certainly groups who are sympathetic to the National Socialists in the region, such as the Azov Battalion. Some of them are in Russia and are Putin supporters. It is a bit rich to have an ex-member of the Bolsheviks accusing the Ukrainians in general and Stepan Bandera in particular of being collaborators with the National Socialists, as it was a Bolshevik alliance with their National Socialist comrades in 1939 that got Bandera released from prison. Note that the Gestapo put him into Sachsenhausen concentration camp from 1941 to 1944.
The roots of Ukrainian collaboration with the Germans began in the First World War, and had much to do with the human treatment policies of Colonel Max Hoffmann's humane treatment of Imperial Russian PoWs. Lenin and Trotsky likewise enjoyed a friendly relationship with the German High Command at this time. This expected German decency, especially in the wake of a deliberate genocide of the Ukrainian people from 1932-34, mae the Wehrmacht extremely popular when it entered Bolshevik territories in 1941. Even the monstrous treatment meted out by the Einsatzgruppen during the war pale in comparison to the food confiscation teams who robbed, brutalized and murdered Ukrainians throughout the pre-war period. It was enough to convince many Ukrainians that the National Socialists were the lesser of two evils, and considering how awful the Stalinists were (by Khrushchev's own admission), they were likely right. Because of this, about a million Ukrainians fought in the Second World War on the side of the Germans. Later, per agreement and as part of Operation Keelhaul, these Ukrainians, their wives and children were turned over to the Bolsheviks by the Western allies and were then shot, often as they were being dragged from train cars.
If you wish to shame Americans for their cooperation with Left fascism, this is a better start.
Poland was never even part of the USSR and was an internationally recognized country after 1918.
Poland had been part of Russia, as had been Finland and the Baltic States. As with Tibet, they made legal claims of this sort base on bogus arguments. As with Tibet, the real reason was that they sought rich mining regions, agricultural land and strategic territory. In the case of Tibet they got two out of three. Note that this was only the "palm" of Mao's "Five Finger Policy" claims - to Nepal, Bhutan, Sikkim, Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh. China has since been the patron of the brutal Maobadi, which orchestrated a ruthless civil war from 1995-2006 and has since gained control of Nepal. Sikkim, Ladakh and Arunachal Pradesh are territories recognized as part of India, and over which there are constant border tensions. The CCP has since funded a military-grade modern highway from Lhasa to Kathmandu in Nepal, which would be hypothetically necessary if, say, the PLA wanted to conduct substantial military operations into India. Bhutan is nervous.
Note also that, as communist China has become increasingly wealthier and their military more advanced, that they have discovered new claims to territory throughout the region, such as the Spratley region and the Senkaku Islands of Japan. In each case the objectives are the same - economic and strategic benefits for the CCP, usually through brutal suppression of the civil rights of the locals, often terrorizing common people and intimidating neighboring states to get whatever they want. It's an old socialist tradition.
The entire world (apparently barring Nepal, Bhutan, and 1910s era Mongolia) recognized Tibet as part of the Republic of China.
The entire European world barely respected the sovereignty of China until the early 20th century. Even then it was sketchy.
Tibetans were not disproportionately affected by the Great Leap Forward because the main impacts were in the most productive agricultural regions of China where grain was confiscated.
Polish Jews were not disproportionately affected compared to Russian Jews during the Holocaust. Polish Jews are still unhappy about their treatment, for some reason.
There were no intentional famines during Stalinism. There was government mismanagement that helped make a natural famine far worse and murder of class enemies, but the Soviet government never created a famine to kill people. Much of that myth was created by the CIA in the 1950s with the aid of Ukrainian Nazi collaborators.
There is overwhelming evidence of a deliberate famine in Ukraine orchestrated between 1932-34. The original work on what was called the Holodomor was by Robert Conquest in his
Bitter Harvest, but was generally speculative and contained errors
. For a more authoritative and detailed discussion based on Bolshevik record and personal accounts see
Red Famine by Anne Applebaum.
And yes, I am familiar with the works of Douglas Tottle and Grover Furr.
I'm getting a little skeptical about your grasp of history and ethnicity. You seem to have some serious blind spots whenever socialist history is brought up, particularly when they involve atrocities and genocides.
The ChiComs won the civil war because the KMT was insanely corrupt, absolutely incompetent at military affairs which took until 1945 to be able to win actual battles against the Japanese.
Mao's armies defeated the KMT because they had a powerful patron in Stalin, who secured Manchuria at the end of the war and then turned it over to their Maoist client state. The heaviest armored vehicles the KMT had were obsolete Bolshevik T-26s, M3 Stuart light tanks and a few M4 Shermans, while the Maoists were receiving surplus captured Japanese equipment such as Chi-Ha tanks from their Stalinist patrons, and with factories in Manchuria were supplied with munitions and parts. Even so it took several years for the "People's Liberation Army" to gain the upper hand.
They were despised by vast swathes of the Chinese peasantry and were one step below the Japanese in terms of the damage they did to China--millions died as a result of their policies.
The Chinese communists were despised by vast swathes of the Chinese people. The KMT fought the Japanese invaders, while the Chinese communists under Mao cut deals with them, trading food for weapons which they stockpiled. The communists had a truce of sorts with the Japanese until very late in the war, when the KMT was already in the process of defeating them.
This is literally like how Snowball was treated in
Animal Farm.
