What makes a good book title?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Fortunato Brown

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 11, 2021
The title of the book may very well be the reason it sells. Maybe the description isn't too interesting but then they put the book on the shelf and they keep thinking about its title. So what makes a good title for a book? What seems like a good way to title books but end up being unmemorable? Have you see any reoccurring aspects of your favorite book titles? What are some of your favorite book titles?
 
I keep thinking of "1984" by Orwell. Super memorable. I think there has to be something creative and abstract about the title. If it's too literal, then it loses some of its power. Hunter Thomson's titles are like that as well.
 
It should, in some way, draw your eyes back to the cover after reading it if you just glance over. Could be a double-take or curiosity. And by that point, it should make you go "How on earth does this title get justified?" And then a good writer justifies it.
Richard Brautigan was an unabashed master of these. A few examples:
>The Abortion: An Historical Romance 1966
>Sombrero Fallout: A Japanese Novel
>In Watermelon Sugar
>Please Plant This Book
>Revenge of the Lawn
>Trout Fishing in America (Most effective if you're familiar with his other works, otherwise the impact is because the covert is just a picture of himself (a greasy hippy with a huge mustache) or a crude pencil drawing of a smiling fish)
 
What seems like a good way to title books but end up being unmemorable?
Have an unmemorable story.

The only reason memorable book titles are memorable is because 1) they're relevant to the story that 2) is itself memorable.
 
One project I've been toying with is called American Isekai.

Where people are intentionally Isekaied, not to get special powers, but because a cyberpunk, 1989 America exhausted magical energy, and since we don't use magical energy, we're rich in that resource. So we're good to harvest for it. I want to use it as an example of why I think its a good title.

It evokes the corporate greed that's rampant in America, contrasted to the traditional 'altruism' of an Isekai, a nerd who lives a hard life gets a second chance. And then he becomes super-powered and gets a cute waifu to explain things to him. In this, you're transported naked into a dystopian nightmare where you have to trust this pretty girl who more often than not leads you to a black market organ auction where companies bid on your parts. And its entirely legal, because people who get Isekai'd to alt-universe America don't count as people and have no rights. And if you try to run away, and escape for 5 days, you're considered 'unclaimed property' and anyone may try and capture you and sell you.

Basically it was partially inspired by Brad Pitt's ending monologue in 'Killing Them Softly' which is the best part of the movie:


So it plays off of the harshness of American capatalism in a satirical parody. Combined with a protagonist out of the 1980s, who's not afraid to blow shit up. So its basically a subversion, yet a fun take on something otherwise stale. And the prefix 'America' informs you that its going to be different, probably bloody and violent and corrupt. And Iskekai speaks for itself.

Is it the best idea in the world? No. But the title conveys everything I want my reader to know in two words. And that should be the goal. The title and the art is a hook to draw them in and get them curious. Then you actually have to make good on that.
 
If you can get a racial slur in there and have the critics explain it away as artistic expression, you're probably golden. Caveat: Can not be done by crackers.

Also, please buy my upcoming book "Cracka Killa", self published on Amazon this fall.
 
What do you guys think about titles that are references to other works or quotes? That seems to be common and generally make it unmemorable but you do have things like Infinite Jest and For Whom the Bell Tolls.

Also, why do some books that are just titled the name of the main character successful? Is that almost always a terrible choice?
 
Using titles I've read recently:

I think in general, the title should either be informative or it should be poetic (and in a way that meaningfully ties into what the book is about). Some general categories of titles I see:

SHORT AND BLUNT
James Clavell likes using single-word, two-syllable titles:
Shogun
Tai-Pan
Gaijin

They're choppy, aggressive, directly say what it's going to be about.

Aztec by Gary Jennings is a different author, but same concept. Excellent title, it's like he's saying, "this is about Aztecs. It's THE Aztec novel." And then the novel is that, it's comprehensive in scope.

Flatland. Very upfront, very memorable.

Delta-v. Thematically not that great, but it does tie into the point about asteroid mining economizing on fuel, fuel concerns do come up a bit, the book makes a point to call back this phrase from time to time. Most importantly, it's spacey and snappy and it's a space book.

Barkskins. What the fuck are barkskins? Lumberjacks. That's not clear, but it's a memorable name. Interesting name.

Orconomics. Shit book, brilliant name. It cons you into thinking you're getting more of a satire than you really are.

Just being short doesn't automatically make it work that way. Ben-Hur is a decent title, it's short, but it's not informative, you'd have to read the book to know who it's talking about, nor is it poetic. So it's just bland. Similarly, The Bees is informative but kind of generic.

LONG AND POETIC (OR WITTY)
The Pillars of the Earth. Is Biblical and also contains architectural imagery. The phrase, even out of context, has gravitas. It's the perfect title for a novel about cathedral construction.

Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas. The title doesn't have a ton of informative content, not even sure what the fear and loathing is (just meant to sound negative since it's "about" the dejection of 1970s counterculture?). But it's very memorable and draws you in, it raises curiosity.

Gone With the Wind. Great title, directly relates to the main theme, uses line from the book.

And Then There Were None. Fits the genre (murder mystery) well, tied into the story, flows off the tongue great. good title.

SHORT AND POETIC
Big Fish. Did not like the book at all, was a chore even for its short length. Did love the Burton movie. Wonderful title, thematically meaningful, sounds interesting. I learned about it specifically because, on Netflix, I saw "BIG FISH" over a man in a carnie outfit.

Measuring the World. Hated the book, love the title. It's about Gauss the mathematician and Humboldt the explorer, and the phrase is wonderful, it conveys this sort of heroic effort.

Corelli's Mandolin. Sounds classy as hell.

"THE" SUCH AND SUCH
"The" titles usually aren't that good. Often they're either blunt without being snappy, or they're vague without drawing one in. For example, "The Peshawar Lancers." Good book. Would I read it if I didn't already know what it was? Fuck no. "The Atlantropa Articles." "The White Bone." "The Leopard." "The Revenant."

The only times I see "The" being used in a good way is when it's something bizarre. THAT'S when "the" is useful. "The Martian." "The Yiddish Policemen's Union" (what the fuck is that?). "The Plague Dogs" (oh no, plague!?1?).

An interesting mix between good and bad is "The Good Shepherd." Sounds lame as hell. But, if you KNOW that it's about merchant marine convoy escorts, it's brilliant, portraying destroyers like shepherds protecting their "flock" from the Wolf-Packs. But if I saw it on a shelf and didn't know what it was I'd stay far away.

OTHERS
Good Rebel Soil is a solid title, it doesn't feel poetic but it has that quality of being evocative. So does "Old Glory."
"A Hell Called Ohio" I bought ENTIRELY on the title, didn't know what it was about. (I returned it, it sucked.)
Similarly, "The Wild Ohio." Something both of those have in common is pairing a thing that sounds mundane and bland (Ohio) with something out there. They're humorous.

GENERAL TAKEAWAYS
If you're writing a thriller or adventure or something of that nature, short and choppy is probably the way to go. The story had better back it up or the title will end up feeling pompous.

If you're writing something else, try to be poetic. Blunt but not snappy is a last resort for if you're not creative.

Never use "the" unless the "the" is going to be followed by something really interesting, that's bottom of the barrel.
 
If you can get a racial slur in there and have the critics explain it away as artistic expression, you're probably golden. Caveat: Can not be done by crackers.
Agatha Christie cares to disagree.
1661242189484.png
 
One that doesn’t make you vomit when your publisher suggests it, and when you say no, they say “too bad, everyone in the office likes it” which is publisher speak for “shut the fuck up faggot, we’ve already decided, now return to your monkey-house and produce content, or it gets the hose again”
 
truly inspired title imo. i’m not a huge fan of Stephen King although i do like him, and Misery isn’t even my favorite book by him, but for some reason this title just hits the sweet spot for me. it’s so simple but deeply evocative and relevant in multiple ways to the book.

What do you guys think about titles that are references to other works or quotes? That seems to be common and generally make it unmemorable but you do have things like Infinite Jest and For Whom the Bell Tolls.

Also, why do some books that are just titled the name of the main character successful? Is that almost always a terrible choice?
the poem The Second Coming by Yeats is referenced by at least two different books, Things Fall Apart by Chinua Achebe (which i really enjoyed) and Slouching Towards Bethlehem by Joan Didion (which i haven’t read but intend to… someday). Things Fall Apart is another title which i love for both its simplicity and relevance to the book itself.

worse than just a character’s name are the “The (job or action)’s (relative)” titles. unbelievably boring uninspired and lame. turns me off a book instantly. the jacket description would have to be extremely compelling for me to want to read a book titled w/this formula
 
Regardless of the actual content of the book, I always thought 'Atlas Shrugged' was a cute title.
I haven't read any of her books, but a lot of them have nice titles.

East of Eden is a nice title, too bad the book was kinda crap.
Death in Venice sounds nice but you probably can't guess well what the book is about.
 
Here are some good book/story titles I like:

A Perfect Day for Bananafish
A Weak Heart
Meek Girl
Franny and Zooey
I am A Cat
Auf Der Marble Klippen
Steppenwolf (wasn't a good book, though)
A Farewell to Arms
The Sound and The Fury
Reynard's Cycle
Consider The Lobster
Mere Christianity
Homage to Catalonia
The Ingenious Hidalgo Don Quixote De A La Mancha
David Copperfield
Infinite Jest
 
Back
Top Bottom