What really happened with the Hunter Biden story suppression by Twitter will be published on Twitter at 5pm ET! - CONSPIRACY THEORY YOU RACIST!!! (Let the shit show begin...)

[Honka Honka Burning Love]

Speaking of investigations - Investigation launches into possible State Department funding of third parties to censor online speech.

This will be as impactful and meaningful as the Jan 6 committee.

 

[Gender of peace]

That special moment when former NSA intelligence analyst Pateick Conlon confirms Trump is booted from Twitter.

Patrick wiped his LinkedIn laying out his credentials, archive here: https://archive.vn/dfryF

He has a gay face

So we have Yoel Roth, a kike pedo faggot (see quotes from his dissertation 'Gay Data' here: https://t.me/mpeinovich/2259 ), and Patrick Conlon, a glownigger and probable faggot, colluding to censor a sitting President. Lol, lmao. America.

 

[Sergeant Major Buzzkill]

I already know what happened. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together knows what happened. I don't need some government-subsidized autist with a god complex to tell me what I've known for over two years now.

Right, like nigga, you're later than a bitch. Nobody cares at this point. It's not going to put Hunter in jail if you "Exposing" him and the Bidens in this manner.

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

Democrat Congressman Ro Khanna is open to investigating Big Tech’s political censorship​

Archive

House Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) said he is “open” to Congressional hearings on Twitter’s suppression of Hunter Biden’s “laptop from hell” story.

“I have said I am open to hearings in Congress on this,” Khanna said in an interview with Fox News’ Maria Bartiromo. “On the one hand, we don’t want censorship. We don’t want to have people censored or boxed out, or shadow-banned and removed from Twitter because of their viewpoint. On the other hand, we do want respect, and we don’t want accounts that are filled with anti-Semitism or just spewing racism or hate on these accounts. And I think Congress should have an honest, thoughtful conversation about how we uphold both of those values.”

Bartiromo then asked: “So hearings would be good, talking about how this took place to ensure it doesn’t happen again. Do you believe this can get better? Can we take the politicization out of federal agencies as well as the media?”

Khanna replied: “I do, Maria, because I think if we want my hope of coming together as a country, the first thing we have to do is say people have to be able to express their view. We can’t tell people we disagree with please be silent. We don’t want to hear you. We don’t want to engage with you. That’s going to create further polarization.”

Khanna is the only Democrat politician that has publicly questioned the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. The internal Twitter documents published by independent journalist Matt Taibbi, Khanna contacted the then-head of legal, policy, and Trust at Twitter, Vijaya Gadde, telling her that the suppression of the story “seems a violation of 1st Amendment principles.”

“A journalist should not be held accountable for the illegal actions of the source unless they actively aided the hack,” Khanna wrote in the email to Gadde on October 14, the day the Post published the story. “I say this as a total Biden partisan and convinced he didn’t do anything wrong. But the story now has become more about censorship than relatively innocuous emails and it’s become a bigger deal than it would have been.”

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

Democrat Congressman Ro Khanna is open to investigating Big Tech’s political censorship​

Archive

“Open to investigating” means nothing if it is just lip service. This kind of thing will do more of just talking around the subject than actually putting forth action into taking political leaders accountable for their misdeeds.

 

[Got Milk!]

Democrat Congressman Ro Khanna is open to investigating Big Tech’s political censorship​

Archive

"On the one hand, we don’t want censorship. We don’t want to have people censored or boxed out, or shadow-banned and removed from Twitter because of their viewpoint. On the other hand, we do want respect, and we don’t want accounts that are filled with anti-Semitism or just spewing racism or hate on these accounts. And I think Congress should have an honest, thoughtful conversation about how we uphold both of those values.”

When the fuck did anything past the second sentence become a starting point for American government? I mean actually said out loud, of course.
E: to clarify further, I mean the part where a Congress person is starting at a position of presumed suppression of speech.

 

[Wormy]

Did ya get Biden impeached yet, son?

 

[ロボ﹏§¤r﹏h¶rœ]

Twitter and Facebook chiefs practiced how to handle “fake” Hunter Biden docs, PRIOR to real story breaking​

Archive

The latest batch of Twitter files, released by independent journalist Michael Shellenberger, revealed that the Aspen Institute held a “tabletop exercise” to influence coverage of a possible future Hunter Biden story. This was prior to the actual Hunter Biden laptop story breaking.

Shellenberger posted documents from the event held in September 2020, which was attended by Twitter’s former head of trust and safety, Facebook’s head of security policy, and top national security reporters at The Washington Post and The New York Times.

View the documents here.

The exercise by Aspen Digital involved an 11-day scenario which started with the imaginary release of “fake” documents related to Hunter Biden’s employment by Ukrainian energy company Burisma.

The company paid the younger Biden $1 million to serve on its board at a time when his father was the Vice President.

According to Shellenberger, “The goal was to shape how the media covered it [the Hunter Biden story] – and how social media carried it.”

The exercise was put to the test just a few weeks later when the New York Post first reported on Hunter Biden’s laptop, which it obtained after Hunter abandoned the laptop at a repair shop in Delaware. The mainstream media either downplayed or ignored it, while social media companies, including Twitter and Facebook, suppressed it.

On October 17, 2020, three days after The Post broke the story, journalist Garrett Graff sent a message to others who participated in the Aspen Institute exercise, saying, “Stephen was right!” However, it is not clear who Stephen is.

The exercise was organized by a former executive at National Public Radio, Vivian Schiller, NBC News, and The New York Times, according to Shellenberger. Schiller has been the executive director of Aspen Digital since January 2020.

The Aspen Institute claims that it “empowers policymakers, civic organizations, companies, and the public to be responsible stewards of technology and media in the service of an informed, just, and equitable world.”

In 2019, the institute, which holds week long seminars and a yearly 10-day “Ideas Festival” attended by business leaders, celebrities, and politicians was described by The Economist as “the mountain retreat for the liberal elite.”

 

[CreamyHerman’s]

Did ya get Biden impeached yet, son?

Are you mad son?

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

Did ya get Biden impeached yet, son?

Did ya get a competent, honest president who isn't an international embarrassment, son?

 

[TruthSeekingDaimon]

Did ya get Biden impeached yet, son?

Not while hes sniffing your kids daddy.

 

[Got Milk!]

Could one of you fine individuals post tweet screenshots or something for us who don't use Twitter? Or is there another thread with in depth posts beyond the first or second dump? I tried looking on Nitter earlier but it was being all fucky. Appreciate anyone who might be able to help out.

 

[CaptainAutism69]

So in the latest Twatter files we learned that Twitter was not overrun by Russian bots/shills, but they started labelling innocent accounts as Russian based on pressure from legacy media and the FBI
We also learned that Twitter was running around like a blue arsed fly censoring anything they were told to from intellegence agencies, the govt, and 'private organisations', including the banning of Zerohedge for the lab leak hypotheses, a book from a Ukranian MP who clamied Biden was involved in corruption, and random journalists who certian politicians didn't like.

 

[Got Milk!]

So in the latest Twatter files we learned that Twitter was not overrun by Russian bots/shills, but they started labelling innocent accounts as Russian based on pressure from legacy media and the FBI
We also learned that Twitter was running around like a blue arsed fly censoring anything they were told to from intellegence agencies, the govt, and 'private organisations', including the banning of Zerohedge for the lab leak hypotheses, a book from a Ukranian MP who clamied Biden was involved in corruption, and random journalists who certian politicians didn't like.

Could someone be cool as fuck and post screenshots? I don't use Twitter and would like to know what's up.

 

[Absolutego]

Could someone be cool as fuck and post screenshots? I don't use Twitter and would like to know what's up.

This is a decent summary of the most recent publications:

First Twitter Files of 2023 shows how intelligence community gained influence over the platform

The first Twitter Files of 2023 have been released by journalist Matt Taibbi, and they reveal how the intelligence community gained

www.teslarati.com

Twitter Files reveal FBI's role as "belly button"

The latest installment of the Twitter Files revealed the FBI's desire for Twitter to rely on it to be the belly button of the U.S.

www.teslarati.com

tl&dr; at the height of Russiagate hysteria after Hillary lost in 2016, when Twitter investigated for known Russian-linked accounts on their site, they found very few compared to what Facebook was claiming they found. The government and media then colluded in a repeated cycle that ultimately led to the intelligence community turning Twitter into a proxy domestic censorship tool. The cycle went as follows:
-Twitter investigates its platform for Russian disinformation - finds a few ad buys from individuals and maybe 1-2 government accounts, but that's it
-One of the sitting members of a Congressional committee either related to foreign affairs, homeland security, or intelligence would screech at Twitter for not having high enough numbers and obviously working in concert with the Russians
-The media would parrot these accusations with absolutely zero investigation and target Twitter's advertisers to increase financial pressure on the firm
-Twitter would then relax standards and try to find more Russians to ban, to little avail
-Cycle repeats

After a while they finally caved and agreed to consult with Intelligence bureaus on moderation principles, and before long they were flooded with every 3-letter agency in the country trying to get them to censor people disagreeing with the government, people questioning COVID lockdowns using the CDC's own data, people questioning foreign policy decisions, etc. They held off for a while (ironically Trump being in office probably prolonged Twitter's fate as a total government toady b/c the upper crust in management were incensed at the idea of Trumpy state officials being the ones to tell them who to censor), but were essentially a proxy around the first amendment by late 2020. Taibbi joked that the $3 million the FBI paid Twitter for its services in 2021 seemed excessive bribery when he first discovered it, but after looking at the volume of reports and how widespread the standards for censorship were, if anything Twitter was underpaid.

So, as many suspected even at the time with Russiagate, the whole thing was almost certainly a domestic disinformation campaign, and social media sites were pressured by the government and corporate media into promoting it lest politicians come after their company and regulate it out of existence.

What's the name again for that style of government where the state and large corporate powers closely collude against the rights of their citizens?

 

[The Ugly One]

What's the name again for that style of government where the state and large corporate powers closely collude against the rights of their citizens?

It's known as Our Democracy.

 

[CaptainAutism69]

This is a decent summary of the most recent publications:

First Twitter Files of 2023 shows how intelligence community gained influence over the platform

The first Twitter Files of 2023 have been released by journalist Matt Taibbi, and they reveal how the intelligence community gained

www.teslarati.com

Twitter Files reveal FBI's role as "belly button"

The latest installment of the Twitter Files revealed the FBI's desire for Twitter to rely on it to be the belly button of the U.S.

www.teslarati.com

tl&dr; at the height of Russiagate hysteria after Hillary lost in 2016, when Twitter investigated for known Russian-linked accounts on their site, they found very few compared to what Facebook was claiming they found. The government and media then colluded in a repeated cycle that ultimately led to the intelligence community turning Twitter into a proxy domestic censorship tool. The cycle went as follows:
-Twitter investigates its platform for Russian disinformation - finds a few ad buys from individuals and maybe 1-2 government accounts, but that's it
-One of the sitting members of a Congressional committee either related to foreign affairs, homeland security, or intelligence would screech at Twitter for not having high enough numbers and obviously working in concert with the Russians
-The media would parrot these accusations with absolutely zero investigation and target Twitter's advertisers to increase financial pressure on the firm
-Twitter would then relax standards and try to find more Russians to ban, to little avail
-Cycle repeats

After a while they finally caved and agreed to consult with Intelligence bureaus on moderation principles, and before long they were flooded with every 3-letter agency in the country trying to get them to censor people disagreeing with the government, people questioning COVID lockdowns using the CDC's own data, people questioning foreign policy decisions, etc. They held off for a while (ironically Trump being in office probably prolonged Twitter's fate as a total government toady b/c the upper crust in management were incensed at the idea of Trumpy state officials being the ones to tell them who to censor), but were essentially a proxy around the first amendment by late 2020. Taibbi joked that the $3 million the FBI paid Twitter for its services in 2021 seemed excessive bribery when he first discovered it, but after looking at the volume of reports and how widespread the standards for censorship were, if anything Twitter was underpaid.

So, as many suspected even at the time with Russiagate, the whole thing was almost certainly a domestic disinformation campaign, and social media sites were pressured by the government and corporate media into promoting it lest politicians come after their company and regulate it out of existence.

What's the name again for that style of government where the state and large corporate powers closely collude against the rights of their citizens?

One of the big takeaways from this is how much the govt has legacy media wrapped around their little finger. 'Do as we say or we send our dogs after you' basically. Ironic that 'Russian disinfo' hysteria was actually 'US disinfo'.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

Matt Taibbi recently did an interesting interview with Fox News’ Tucker Carlson criticizing journalists for making the Twitter Files into a partisan, political issue:

Host Tucker Carlson asked, [relevant exchange begins around 2:35] “[T]here are a lot of different nonprofit organizations that purport to defend free speech on behalf of journalists…have any of them weighed in on this and raised holy hell?”

Taibbi responded, “No. And that’s been a profound disappointment. For me personally, I gave to the ACLU for years. I’m one of those sort of dyed-in-the-wool liberals and grew up that way. I’m deeply disappointed. I think a lot of people who are sort of politically on that side of the aisle are missing the boat on this. They don’t understand the gravity of the situation. They’re thinking about this in partisan terms. It’s not a partisan story. This is a story about the architecture of the intelligence community and law enforcement getting its hands on speech and on the ability of people to communicate with one another through platforms like Twitter and Facebook. And they’re doing this in a very profound way, much more serious than I thought at the beginning of this story.”

 

[Standardized Profile]

That special moment when former NSA intelligence analyst Pateick Conlon confirms Trump is booted from Twitter.
View attachment 4040139

View attachment 4040076
Patrick wiped his LinkedIn laying out his credentials, archive here: https://archive.vn/dfryF

He has a gay face
View attachment 4040091

Note how he's an "expert" in Chinese, and Russian, and intelligence, and counterintelligence. And he delegated to fellow (never subordinate) analysts, and briefed people, and specialized on everything from nation-states to commercial entities. He did all this in less than six years. It sounds like he did a development program, got assigned to a real job, and quit as soon as he could.

Also LOL at "authored hundreds of reports." A SIGINT report is like a paragraph or two. It isn't an academic-style all-source analytic product.