What should be done to stop mass shootings?

Lol infanticide is killing infants. A fetus isn't an infant. I know you're a proud, low-IQ, anti-education simpleton so definitions are hard for you, but you should look up the definition of words. You'll look like less of a simpleton, but then again, you take pride in being one. You even have to steal my words you're such a simpleton.
I don't care about the definition of infant or infanticide. The unborn child is a human being, so admit you're ok with killing an innocent and stop hiding behind weasel words like a faggot. There is no moral distinction between a viable fetus and a newborn. 'Ackshually the fetus is not an infant' is a very low IQ take for someone who claims to be so enlightened and educated.

I know you have crippling autism but I use your words to mock you, son. It's really easy since you never come up with anything new. I can tell it bothers you, so I'm going to keep doing it.
 
I don't care about the definition of infant or infanticide. The unborn child is a human being, so admit you're ok with killing an innocent and stop hiding behind weasel words like a faggot. There is no moral distinction between a viable fetus and a newborn. 'Ackshually the fetus is not an infant' is a very low IQ take for someone who claims to be so enlightened and educated.

I know you have crippling autism but I use your words to mock you, son. It's really easy since you never come up with anything new. I can tell it bothers you, so I'm going to keep doing it.
The unborn child is no more human than cake batter is a cake. Sorry that you want to force women to give up their bodily autonomy and have fewer rights than a corpse does, just because you're a bible thumping boomer.

I know it upsets you that not everyone wants to live in a theocracy like the year 1600. I know that it makes your diseased brain seething mad that not everyone has the worldview of a bible thumping religious zealot 85 year old man in the year 1955. In fact, I know it makes you even more seething mad that your boomer political party, that you worship to the point you get seething mad when someone doesn't agree with their theocratic views, are very unpopular in this nation (as shown in the recent elections) and that most people don't want to live in a biblical theocracy like your diseased, senile brain does. Get with the times, old man.
 
Aww, little bible thumper is seething mad that not everyone wants to live in a theocracy like he does.
How could I be mad at such a dimwitted bug man? You don't have the intellectual capacity to understand what you're saying, you just repeat talking points from your atheist boomer facebook group.
 
How could I be mad at such a dimwitted bug man? You don't have the intellectual capacity to understand what you're saying, you just repeat talking points from your atheist boomer facebook group.
How ironic that the guy who votes and supports everything boomers do is calling someone who does not vote or support what boomers do a "boomer". It's also ironic that you don't understand this and are calling someone else "dimwitted". I know you have a well-deserved reputation for being a low IQ simpleton, but you're taking it to a new level here. Now go to your megachurch and talk to your pastor, maybe it'll calm your bible-thumping ass down a bit.

And yes, supporting everything Republicans does is what boomers do. The reason the "red wave" didn't happen was that younger voters voted Democrat and not for your theocratic political party.
 
There's a glorification of the act of individual violence, that is not violence in general but the "righteous" violent actions of one person on the rest, that permeates our culture. We got movies where the hero is basically shooting into a mass of people that didn't personally do him any harm but they are on the way/they are henchmen and thus should die, a mass of NPCs with no value like cops and civilians in the matrix movies.

This wasn't the case, in the old days only the bad guys went into a rampage killing a bunch of people, the hero didn't even kill the bad guys most of the time. But violence sells, so they put more violence in media which makes violence cool and the protagonist has to be cool so they make the protagonist increasingly more violent.

In many of these movies the protagonist has been wronged somehow which validates all the violence to come as part of his payback, this at a time when communities are being eroded from outside and within, social atomization its everywhere, we're becoming a zero-trust society where everybody feels the other is trying to screw them over.

They think, like chris in the sopranos, that they have a character arc, and that the reason why their lives suck is because they havent found it. So now a bunch of social outcasts in a culture obsessed with movies actually believe they are the protagonist and everybody else an NPC obstructing their way, guess what happens next?
 
How ironic that the guy who votes and supports everything boomers do is calling someone who does not vote or support what boomers do a "boomer". It's also ironic that you don't understand this and are calling someone else "dimwitted".
You have the worldview of a 74 year old jewish woman from Brooklyn. You both want to disarm law abiding people and murder innocent human beings. You both get swindled by homosexuals like pete buttigieg. You both probably have brain damage from decades of drinking cheap box wine.

The only difference is you are more progressive on the trans kids issue than the average elderly yenta.
And yes, supporting everything Republicans does is what boomers do. The reason the "red wave" didn't happen was that younger voters voted Democrat and not for your theocratic political party.
Are you able to think about anything without relating it back to contemporary american politics? I understand we live in a society with a massive amount of low vibration whores and their simps (like you). I'm not surprised the "red wave" was prevented largely because of the abortion issue. I also don't care because I think 99% of republicans are spineless faggots.
 
Nothing. Well, that comes out badly... that is to say that mass shootings while tragic are overblown with sensationalism because they are a useful tool for manipulating emotionally driven people to give up their rights.

When looking at it logically less than 1 in a million people are ever going to to commit any such act in their life-time and at that point it just falls into the unavoidable fact that through nature and/or nurture some people will be violent psychos and there is little that can be done about it at such large scale of distinct individuals. To think that this requires the other 999,999+ people per millionish to be deprived of rights is just pure authoritarian wet dream, and this excluding when maybe some of the incidents are not organic and prodded on by those authoritarian powers themselves. If we looked at other statistics in the same vein of fixing the problem almost everything would be banned for killing more than mass shooting and some other numbers... well, it might be seen as racist, wink wink.

Other countries that boast and jab at America for this are full of violence with other weapons at mass scale just the same as it doesn't change the 1 in a million psycho chance and also they have mass shootings too, they just are not as profitable to publicize as it doesn't forward the agenda and instead hurts it. Those country's citizens pay for this "improvement" by being serfs who deal with substantially more draconian laws and extreme reduction in personal freedom.

So yeah, on an individual response level more could be done to not have cops sit around and do nothing on orders to stand down for some reason that surely isn't benefiting someone, but on a societal level any action is a facade to screw you over.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Seafarer
Make alot of those Robot dogs and have them patroling everywhere for spergs with guns
sword_spur_robot_dog_gun.jpeg
 
You have the worldview of a 74 year old jewish woman from Brooklyn. You both want to disarm law abiding people and murder innocent human beings. You both get swindled by homosexuals like pete buttigieg. You both probably have brain damage from decades of drinking cheap box wine.

The only difference is you are more progressive on the trans kids issue than the average elderly yenta.

Are you able to think about anything without relating it back to contemporary american politics? I understand we live in a society with a massive amount of low vibration whores and their simps (like you). I'm not surprised the "red wave" was prevented largely because of the abortion issue. I also don't care because I think 99% of republicans are spineless faggots.
You want to force women to give birth to babies, but once those babies are born, you don't give a shit if they get shot or if they starve to death or can't access healthcare. You think poor people shouldn't have access to healthcare, but you want to force them to give birth because you're a religious zealot.

And yes, the vast majority of Republican lovers like you are boomers. Sorry that me pointing out that you have the worldview of an 85 year old religious zealot in the year 1955 has your little fee-fees hurt so bad. You yourself even admitted that you have to lie about your views or women won't talk to you. Like I said, go back to your megachurch and talk to your pastor so your boomer ass will calm down a bit

Sure, you totally hate Republicans but you agree with them on 100% of issues and get seething mad when someone criticizes them or their backwards policies. At least have the balls and own the fact that you act like someone that is 3 times your age. The future is now, old man.
 
I understand we live in a society with a massive amount of low vibration whores and their simps (like you).
For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.
John 3:17
Stop making a mockery of the word of the Lord to use as a bully stick to soothe your ego.
Thanks!
 
once those babies are born, you don't give a shit if they get shot
The reality is most mass shootings are gang bangers blowing each other away. You're right, I don't care when they get shot. Live by the gun, die by the gun. Cope and seethe about it if you must.
You think poor people shouldn't have access to healthcare, but you want to force them to give birth because you're a religious zealot.
You can have free healthcare or you can have open borders but you can't have both. I actually do like the Nordic model - over 90% ethnically European with free healthcare for all citizens.
The future is now, old man.
You're excited to participate in drag queen story hour, we know.
For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him.
John 3:17
Stop making a mockery of the word of the Lord to use as a bully stick to soothe your ego.
Thanks!
A furry gimmick account quoting scripture? Congratulations, you're a faggot.

I'm actually not religious, despite what HHH likes to mindlessly repeat ad infinitum. Like I've been saying all along, my views on this topic are based in the science of embryology.
 
Back