https://medium.com/@lisakreut/leather-latex-labour-5567ced0b164
By the end of the article, the author seems to completely forget the connection with labor and union movements and just spergs about polyamory and kink for another 500 words. I'm sure the blue-collar union workers they're supposedly advocating for will really appreciate all the comparisons to kinksters.
recently kink communities have organized to monitor problematic tops, and are starting to employ tools like sexual assault intervention, police walkthroughs, transformative justice, crisis services, and community blacklists.
We also train trusted kinksters to attend parties and monitor activities to make sure good consent and safety are observed. These people often wear a sash and are called dungeon monitors. They’re almost like an ombudsperson.
Now, the labour movement might not need people walking through bedrooms to make sure there’s no funny business, but we could employ some other ideas designed to make sure we’re all watching out for each other.
The fact that it’s uncomfortable or triggering for some members is valid, but in the labour movement, particularly in our social justice work, we balance the exposure to uncomfortable and triggering subjects with the importance of the work that we’re doing. I would propose that if we can prevent a sexual assault, it’s worth five minutes of discomfort.
I also think the union should apply its standard trigger reduction procedures when these topics come up, have active listeners and ombudspeople on hand, and warn people that we will be talking about sex.
By the end of the article, the author seems to completely forget the connection with labor and union movements and just spergs about polyamory and kink for another 500 words. I'm sure the blue-collar union workers they're supposedly advocating for will really appreciate all the comparisons to kinksters.