What would a global election look like?

Global referendum on the question of "should gay marriage be legal, and legally recognized?" would probably result in "no" winning.

Possibly by a landslide. Obviously assuming that somehow everyone's votes are counted accurately and without "Interference" or "fortification" -measures.
 
I want to see it like a reality show. Survivor. But if you get eliminated you die for real. Winner gets to be Prime Presidential Emperor until next season.
 

What would a global election look like?.​

Click to expand...
Billions of niggers voting for whomever promises them the biggest gibs, so same as any election in modern Burgerland
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shroom King
No matter the outcome, what follows is more faggotry, infinity niggers, globohomo and state enforced DEI. "Demoracy" is indeed the worst form of government.
 
A unified world government has been pushed as "the way of the future" in fiction, but IRL it'd be a global "woke" tyranny with nowhere to escape to on the planet. That whole world could become like California... with major cities going NYC and Portland.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: waffle
There would be blocks of pre-unification affinity groups (E.G. Anglosphere) who would all be trying to pick their guys and then commit as much voter fraud as humanly possible to make sure he wins because they view anyone else winning as an existential threat to their way of life. Everyone else would be double afraid of what happens if the indians or blacks did the same thing and I imagine everyone else would tacitly agree to ignore the result if they did.
 
1729740550897.jpeg
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Lieutenant Rasczak
global elections would fuck up first world lifestyles if everyone could easily vote and their votes were actually counted, wouldnt it? Like, if some guy ran on making a global minimum wage then everyone making less than that would vote for him. But all the stuff we in the US buy is priced based on people making an average of 1-4$ per hour so everything would immediately become more expensive to produce, even if the global minimum wage were raised to $6.50 or something. Its just hard to comprehend how a one world democratic government would work in terms of legislation and enforcement.
 
If we're going by country size, China and India would have the most defacto voting power due to how large their populations are. They would basically be picking the next World Emperor every election.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back