What would a modern American insurgency look like? - Playing armchair general in the Autistic Thunderdome

Penis Drager

Schrödinger's retard
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 8, 2020
As you all know, today is the day Americans commemorate the time our ancestors chimped out about having to pay taxes. They started breaking shit and shooting British soldiers until the Brits eventually fucked off and went back to drinking tea and molesting children or whatever the fuck it is the British do when they're not oppressing people. And now we all celebrate by getting drunk and blowing shit up.

What would a "second American Revolution" look like, though? It's a topic that gets thrown around pretty often in some circles so let's discuss it:
The first thing to note is the obvious asymmetric nature of the conflict. Post the funny meme about the British having a big navy blah blah blah "you can't take them on" or whatever. The balance of force is ostensibly much more lopsided today than it was almost two and a half centuries ago. An American insurgency would look a lot more like the Taliban than an organized militia. It would be suicide to engage in direct combat on a level playing field.
A competent insurgency would focus more on destroying infrastructure. They'd blow up railroads, bomb intersections, hijack freight trucks, burn farms, etc. No matter how noble the insurgency's cause (and it almost certainly wouldn't be), the general public, and especially those in the cities, would almost unanimously hate them. So starving the cities out isn't such a problem, especially if it further taxes the government who has to respond to the crisis or risk losing the trust among the people that it can still operate.
The goal wouldn't be to kill uniformed soldiers until the government surrenders. That's retarded. The insurgency should seek to avoid contact with the armed forces whenever possible. Literally running away with their tail between their legs at the first sight of a trained soldier would usually be preferable to attempting to engage unless said troops are found in a uniquely compromised position.
The goal would be to render the system incapable of providing basic services to the people. They would seek to take away the bread and circuses and watch the system collapse on itself.

Expand on this as you feel necessary. Contradict me where you think I'm wrong. Point out that these aren't unique or insightful ideas because they aren't. Call me a retarded faggot when it's funny. Just please no fedposting. I'm not advocating for any of this behavior and any seditious insurgency is probably going to be worse than what we have so even if it weren't just a retarded thing to do, it's also retarded to support the people who'd try to do it.
 
Last edited:
Well, Mr. FBI, not that I would have any firsthand knowledge of any such thing but I think if there was ever a real, dangerous insurgent movement in America, they'd probably dress like anemic teenagers from the mid 2000s and wear piercings, tattoos and clothing with stylized "A" on them for "Antifa", so I think that's who you should go look into and possibly throw into a black hole in the polish soil.
 
Well, Mr. FBI, not that I would have any firsthand knowledge of any such thing but I think if there was ever a real, dangerous insurgent movement in America, they'd probably dress like anemic teenagers from the mid 2000s and wear piercings, tattoos and clothing with stylized "A" on them for "Antifa", so I think that's who you should go look into and possibly throw into a black hole in the polish soil.
One thing I actually did want to discuss is the "who."
Commie faggots might start it. So might the white supremacist "Northwest Territorial Imperative" types but they're pretty fucking impotent and content with sticking to themselves while telling niggers to fuck off when they enter their turf. But there will necessarily be counter-insurgencies where people of conflicting values will take up arms if the system gets weakened and there will be a situation where at least two ideologically opposed groups will start killing government employees while also killing each other.

This is also a hilarious failure mode to an actual insurgency wherein the right wing insurgents fixate on killing left wing insurgents (or vice versa) instead of actually targeting the system and accomplishing their goals.
 
Speaking purely domestically for a moment:

It'll happen thanks to organized groups of disillusioned youth being granted hope and positive lifestyle changes. It's very "in fashion" to call the only group granting said hope and positive lifestyle changes a bunch of glowies, but my money's on them. It'll happen so suddenly that it'll surprise the shit out of almost everyone else. Certain demographics within the zoomer and younger millennial populations feel completely left behind and hated (for immutable characteristics, no less) by society right now, and they will ultimately be the catalyst for change. The aforementioned group understands this.

It certainly won't be Joe 6-pack or any other flavor of conservative ("we can win this time, guys! let's go vote!"), and any globohomo-approved leftism won't be effective enough. The former is too cucked, and the latter is too antithetical to humanity to pull it off..thankfully.
 
Speaking purely domestically for a moment:

It'll happen thanks to organized groups of disillusioned youth being granted hope and positive lifestyle changes. It's very "in fashion" to call the only group granting said hope and positive lifestyle changes a bunch of glowies, but my money's on them. It'll happen so suddenly that it'll surprise the shit out of almost everyone else. Certain demographics within the zoomer and younger millennial populations feel completely left behind and hated (for immutable characteristics, no less) by society right now, and they will ultimately be the catalyst for change. The aforementioned group understands this.

It certainly won't be Joe 6-pack or any other flavor of conservative ("we can win this time, guys! let's go vote!"), and any globohomo-approved leftism won't be effective enough. The former is too cucked, and the latter is too antithetical to humanity to pull it off..thankfully.

Maybe we'll get American Adolf Hitler, that'd be pretty funny
 
God Bless Israel and tthe United States. I'm surprised none of you posted that old greentext, I couldn't find it saved on my hard drive so enjoy the quoted version.
Former red team planner for the government here. If there was a revolution in the US, the rest of the world would get involved, fast. Depending on the type of uprising, there is a large chance that it would not be a quick affair. It would be brutal, it would be bloody, and the US government could start a global scale war. Here are the top ten issues that came up.

1) The US power grid can be taken down by a series of “surgical strikes” with the exception of the Texas grid. By surgical strikes, I mean a few marksmen (US army-tier Marksmen–the minimum requirement) hitting certain spots on the grid would fuck a lot of the military and government because they need the grid more than Bubba and his friends do. Additionally, while all government agencies have backup generators, they will be hard pressed dealing with the resultant looting and other madness that would come with power outages. This would effectively create another front for the military. It would also turn the people against the government more quickly and paralyze the government’s propaganda machine. Worse still–the key points of the US power grid are publicly obtainable information, and not only are the points too many to be effectively guarded, they are not guarded anyway.

2) The estimated desertion rate in case of a civil war is 75% in the case of a left-wing president. 50% of that would be assumed to immediately betray the president. The remaining (treasonous) military would be fighting its own. Yet another front created in the war. Additionally, there is an assumed 25-50% desertion or outright betrayal rate in three letter government agencies (FBI, CIA, NSA, ATC, TSA, etc.). Additionally, it is assumed that 5% of the initial 50% betrayers would stay in their job and become saboteurs. 10% of that 50% would contain key information that would be of critical danger to the US government. Of that 10%, 1% would be able to deliver that information to the US’ foreign enemies. What you should get from this is that the second the United States government declares war on its own is the second it ceases to exist as the state we know it.

3) “Tea baggers,” “right-wing extremists,” and “oath keepers” which are considered untrained racists who aren’t “good with a gun” often are A) veterans who now have more time to have fun at the range, sometimes more than some Army units or Marine units. In addition to previous military training, B) often camp and do other outdoor activities–more than many in the military do, as the focus has gone away from field exercises, and C) often have better equipment–outside of armor and heavy weapons–than the military. However, C) is kind of irrelevant because many of the places in which these people could hide would make the kind of war the US fights with the equipment they use pointless.

4) Outside influence is a huge problem. Russia has already stated they would back a Texas separatist movement, and right now we already have enough problem keeping Islam in check. The second the US has to fight in a “civil war” is the second it becomes a proxy war between NATO and whoever wants to mess with America. While America has amazing nuclear and air defense, if it comes to a civil war you have to assume that in a best cast scenario the US military is going to be operating at 50% capacity at best. Shit would go down. Hard. And fast. And if Russia–spoiler alert: one of the best militaries in the world at fighting in an urban environment–sent trainers and helpers to rebels, you can reliably bet that they would also possibly deliver weapons to them. So instead of fighting “Timmy TeaBagger,” you are fighting “Timmy TeaBagger who is buddies with Vlad.”

5) A civil war is not just the US versus the rebels. There will be looting. There will be rioting. Cities will burn. The National Guard cannot fight both the rebels and rioters in a city that would also cut off their supplies. Additionally, if you don’t think that the rebels will send in instigators into the cities–or worse, stand alone actors (A Lone Wolf on steroids. Think Timothy McVeigh, but instead of one van they have a whole fleet of them. A good movie example would be Bane)–you would be mistaken. If the US government cannot even help its own people, why would its own people support the remaining (treasonous) military? Worse yet, if someone emptied out prisons (There are more prisoners in the US than there are people in the entire Chinese Army), you would have more crime than the police could ever handle.

6) Logistics and infrastructure in the US are crumbling and failing. Any war fought against a rebellion in the US would be a logistical nightmare, even before the rebels started going full Al-Qaida and putting IEDs in the road. A retired general who was contracting with us on the team said, “The only thing holding together the US’ infrastructure is duct tape and the will of the Department of Transportation. And often enough, there isn't enough duct tape.” Your most loyal cities to the US government, as we polled, are also the most logistically easy to cut off. NYC? San Fran? L.A.? D.C.? Baltimore? Most of them require crossing water to enter, from certain directions. Most of them have critical airports. Some of them have critical ocean ports. If anything happened to just TWO of the cities on the list, it would create a logistical clusterfuck.

7) Your “Johnny Reb” and “Timmy TeaBagger” states (i.e., “red” states) all have something most of your “oh so progressive,” “Aren’t we so European,” “Oh my god, we are just like Sweden,” blue states don’t. Blues are mainly consumer states. Reds are producer states. Urban areas don’t have farms. The second that shit goes down, realize a lot of those blue areas are likely to starve. In a civil war scenario, we predicted that at least 10,000 people would die of starvation if the war was not finished in a year. The numbers get worse after that. Or better, rather, for the country after the war.

8) The US has way too many choke points, and the government forces would often be on the wrong side of them. This ties into the logistical nightmare, but it also has to do with an odd phenomena. Liberals like to live near the ocean. Many of the dividers of the country, like the Rocky Mountains, the Mississippi River, Appalachia, the Missouri River (fun fact: the biggest choke point for the US government is in Missouri) are red state areas. Sure, air travel is a thing, but a majority of the US government's needs would have to travel by ground. Even still, many of the major airports are outside of the city. Of course, the US would use military base air fields, but if civil war did break out… which bases would be safe? Which ones would have fallen to the deserters?

9) PR Nightmare. Every rebel killed on CNN would be spun as “the US government killed X Civilians today in a strike” on foreign news and pirate media not owned by the government. That is–as pointed out earlier–if the US media could even function in a civil war or uprising. Your “rebel scum” know that the main thing that holds together the US–nay life in the US as we know it–is the 24 hour news cycle and the media. The second it's gone, you are going to have urban anarchy. If you are from America, can you imagine a day without TV, newspaper, or Internet? Your average urban youth can’t. If you don’t think that isn’t going to cause rioting, you must have a real high regard for how much restraint they have. Assume in a civil war that your ability to talk to the people is compromised. Also assume that in the case of a civil war that rebels may know how to monitor conversations like the US does, as there are manuals online on how to do so.

10) This one is either 1 or 10, depending on who is asked. The US will never nuke its own. The second it does, they have lost the civil war and other countries will come to “liberate” the US from its own “repressive regime.” Additionally, if any general, minuteman, nuke tech, or nuke sub captain decided to side with the rebellion, the US government is immediately SOL.

In short: The second that a “civilian uprising” or “extremist group terrorist attack” turns into “civil war” is the second the US loses. As a result, you will never see a civil war. You will see Waco, you will see Bundy Ranch, you will see all sorts of militant group confrontations and maybe even some skirmishes. But the US government fears its own people way the fuck too much to ever start a civil war.
As an American, I want all other Americans here to remember this. The government is against you, almost openly now, but they also know that they cannot win if it comes to open war. We have a trump card they cannot match. If it comes to a fight, THEY WILL LOSE, so there are elements in the establishment who will do absolutely everything in their power to prevent it from coming to that. The US Government is not in support of its people, and the people are not in support of the government.
It is within the means of certain interests to start World War III simply as a distraction to avoid an American Civil War, because, by their reckoning, it is better to ruin other “lesser” nations like Syria and spill the blood of patriots than lose their own grip on power. ***********YOU HEARD RIGHT. WORLD WAR III ITSELF COULD BE A DELIBERATE FALSE FLAG TO PREVENT A POWER CHANGE IN AMERICA. REMEMBER THIS.***********
 
IMG_9982.PNG1467164681659.pngIMG_9938(1).png8f28bd5ec8b3d411c7adba6ec2d16c61643cb7fc836147f93d2e08c43303f165.png
I cannot tell you exactly how it will unfold, because the capacity and organization of the two+ sides could vary wildly.

⦿ I imagine the first most important variable is rationing of energy and food, if it is not at all arranged by the time the event begins then every action of the occupational force grows much harder. If a soviet-style food collectivization pairs with huge expenses in fuel or a transition to electric cars then the ability to control the population grows exponentially compared to a situation where guns/grub/gas are largely out of the hands of the occupation and in the hands of the occupied population.

16b1fe1c85459d0eca471046a908900241023116f40c830833585d4a86454b56.pngIMG_9565.PNGIMG_8706.PNG1419059843303.jpg
⦿ Next is the morale levels in the two sides fighting forces, for while Heaven is high and the emperor is far away there is room to misbehave both in the population toward independence and in the armed forces for the taking of bribes or the withdrawals of costly patrols. If morale is high in Washington and low among Americans then the occupation will become accepted and order from above will be seen as natural and fighting it seen as wickedness. If morale is low in Washington and high among Americans then the occupational forces would see their presence mocked and fought passively as well as aggressively.

9ea423619b784b6ca07583c860d55c382fc4afa37228f4ea82936356d24d813e.pngIMG_8693.PNGIMG_1738.JPGIMG_1708.JPG
⦿ Third is the strategic goals of the two+ sides, are the republicans with the democrats or against them? Are the insurgents a red/brown alliance, christian, white nationalists, or are they multiple and hostile to each other like the Republican side of the Spanish Civil War? Who are the enemies, and what language we use against them is important. If we don't define our side inclusively enough or define the enemy too inclusively then we lose support against the horrid occupation and so lose potential coalitions which might splinter or regionalize afterwards but fight against a common foe first.

⦿ Fourth are the tactics, how mutually understanding are we going to be or how brutally are we going to impose our frame-game on the other team? To use Israelis as an example in order to ensure no suggestion of IRL Fedposting..

After the British Declaration of War in September 1939, the head of the Jewish Agency for Palestine David Ben-Gurion declared: 'We will fight the White Paper as if there is no war, and fight the war as if there is no White Paper.' The White Paper of 1939 was a policy paper issued by the British government, led by Neville Chamberlain, in response to the 1936–1939 Arab revolt in Palestine, imposing significant limits in Jewish immigration in the shadow of World War II. The Stern Gang continued anti-British attacks and direct action throughout the war. At that time, the British also supported the creation and the training of Palmach, as a unit that could withstand a German offensive in the area, which saw itself as an opportunity to get trained units and soldiers for the planned Jewish state and during 1944–1945, the most mainstream Jewish paramilitary organization, Haganah, cooperated with the British authorities against the Stern Gang.

After World War II, between 1945 and the 29 November 1947 Partition vote, British soldiers and policemen were targeted by Stern Gang. The Haganah and Palmach at first collaborated with the British against them, particularly during the Hunting Season, before actively joining them in the Jewish Resistance Movement. Towards the end of July 1945 the Labour party in Britain was elected to power. The Yishuv leadership had high hopes that this would change the anti-Zionist policy that the British maintained at the time. However, these hopes were quickly dashed when the government limited Jewish immigration, with the intention that the population of Mandatory Palestine (the land west of the Jordan River) would not be more than one-third of the total. This, along with the stepping up of arrests and their pursuit of underground members and illegal immigration organizers led to the formation of the Jewish Resistance Movement. This body consolidated the armed resistance to the British of the Stern Gang and Haganah. For ten months the Stern Gang carried out nineteen attacks and defense operations. The Haganah and Palmach carried out ten such operations. The Haganah also assisted in landing 13,000 illegal immigrants.

Operation Agatha (Saturday, June 29, 1946), sometimes called Black Sabbath (Hebrew: השבת השחורה) or Black Saturday because it began on the Jewish sabbath, was a police and military operation conducted by the British authorities in Mandatory Palestine. Soldiers and police searched for arms and made arrests in Jerusalem, Tel Aviv, Haifa and several dozen settlements; the Jewish Agency was raided. The total number of British security forces involved is variously reported as 10,000, 17,000, and 25,000. About 2,700 individuals were arrested, among them future Israeli Prime Minister Moshe Sharett. The officially given purpose of the operation was to end "the state of anarchy" then existing in Palestine. Other objectives included obtaining documentary proof of Jewish Agency approval of sabotage operations by the Palmach and of an alliance between the Haganah and the more violent Stern Gang, destroying the Haganah's military power, boosting army morale and preventing a coup d'état being mounted by the Stern Gang.

In December 1946 a sentence of 18 years and 18 beatings was handed down to a young Stern Gang member for robbing a bank. The Stern Gang made good on a threat they made and after the detainee was whipped, Stern Gang members kidnapped British officers and beat them in public. The operation, known as the "Night of the Beatings" brought an end to British punitive beatings. The British, taking these acts seriously, moved many British families in Palestine into the confines of military bases, and some moved home. On 4 January 1947, the Stern Gang detonated a lorry bomb against the headquarters of the paramilitary Najjada located in Jaffa's Town Hall, killing 15 Arabs and injuring 80. During the night between 5 and 6 January, the Haganah bombed the Semiramis Hotel in Jerusalem that had been reported to hide Arab militiamen, killing 24 people. The next day, Stern Gang members in a stolen police van rolled a barrel bomb into a large group of civilians who were waiting for a bus by the Jaffa Gate, killing around 16. Another Stern Gang bomb went off in the Ramla market on February 18, killing 7 residents and injuring 45. On 28 February, the Palmah organised a bombing attack against a garage in Haifa, killing 30 people.

On April 16, 1947, Stern Gang members Dov Gruner, Yehiel Dresner, Eliezer Kashani, and Mordechai Alkahi were hanged in Acre Prison, while singing Hatikvah. On April 21 Meir Feinstein and Moshe Barazani blew themselves up, using a smuggled grenade, hours before their scheduled hanging. And on May 4 one of Stern Gang's largest operations took place – the raid on Acre Prison. The operation was carried out by 23 men, commanded by Shimshon, along with the help of the Stern Gang prisoners inside the prison. The gang had informed them of the plan in advance and smuggled in explosives. After a hole was blasted in the prison wall, the 41 Stern Gang members who had been chosen to escape then ran to the hole, blasting through inner prison gates with the smuggled explosives. Meanwhile, Stern Gang teams mined roads and launched a mortar attack on a nearby British Army camp to delay the arrival of responding British forces. Although the 41 escapees managed to get out of the prison and board the escape trucks, some were rapidly recaptured and nine of the escapees and attackers were killed. Five Stern Gang men in the attacking party were also captured. Overall, 27 of the 41 designated escapees managed to escape. Along with the underground movement members, other criminals – including 214 Arabs – also escaped. Of the five attackers who were caught, three of them – Avshalom Haviv, Meir Nakar, and Yaakov Weiss, were sentenced to death. After the death sentences of the three were confirmed, the Stern Gang tried to save them by kidnapping hostages — British sergeants Clifford Martin and Mervyn Paice — in the streets of Netanya. British forces closed off and combed the area in search of the two, but did not find them. On July 29, 1947, in the afternoon, Meir Nakar, Avshalom Haviv, and Yaakov Weiss were executed. Approximately thirteen hours later the hostages were hanged in retaliation by the Stern Gang and their bodies, booby-trapped with an explosive, afterwards strung up from trees in woodlands south of Netanya.

This action caused an outcry in Britain and was condemned both there and by Jewish leaders in Palestine. This episode has been given as a major influence on the British decision to terminate the Mandate and leave Palestine. The United Nations Special Committee on Palestine (UNSCOP) was also influenced by this and other actions. At the same time another incident was developing – the events of the ship Exodus 1947. The 4,500 Holocaust survivors on board were not allowed to enter Palestine. UNSCOP also covered the events. Some of its members were even present at Haifa port when the putative immigrants were forcefully removed from their ship (later found to have been rigged with an IED by some of its passengers) onto the deportation ships, and later commented that this strong image helped them press for an immediate solution for Jewish immigration and the question of Palestine. Two weeks later, the House of Commons convened for a special debate on events in Palestine, and concluded that their soldiers should be withdrawn as soon as possible. In April, 6 weeks before the termination of the Mandate, the Jewish militias launched wide operations to control the territory dedicated to them by the Partition Plan. Many atrocities occurred during this time. The Arab population in the mixed cities of Tiberias, Safed, Haifa and Jaffa, as well as Beisan and Acre and in the neighbouring villages, fled or were expelled during this period. At the beginning of the civil war, the Jewish militias organized several bombing attacks against civilians and military Arab targets. On 12 December, Stern Gang placed a car bomb opposite the Damascus Gate, killing 20 people.


IMG_9045.PNG47472496e4188c846cdc58df05158853b28b2e52c57c71dd966f7b5f2e503935.pngIMG_9926.PNG
I only state things this way because Jews are of course blameless in all things, and so freedom-loving Americans fighting likewise morally do nothing wrong. These tactics rely on many fronts cooperating behind the scenes in mutual understanding while condemning each other publicly. This might be too Jewish for White Americans too autistic to understand the necessity in the Israeli context, watch the 2019 movie Captive State which simply could not be made today three years later. However layers of Washington-friendly collaborators to American patriots must be formed for the result to turn likewise. Don't be afraid to use hypocritical messaging to the public, they will and the resulting mess will cancel out hypocrisies and leave only the Friend/Enemy distinctions based around who will give you the future you want. Nobody remembers the Requetés of Spain, the Küstrin or Kapp–Lüttwitz Putsches, or the other two French Consuls Charles-François Lebrun & Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès. Assume no one equally will understand the hypocrisies of the insurgencies, only the outcome.

⦿ Lastly, no real Third American Revolution will work if it is solely Right or Left. Left-wing Economics exist for a reason, Right-wing Social Structures exist for a reason. You don't have to adopt them, but you need to fulfill them by other means at least. He that will not work shall not eat, but the largess of capitalism cannot exist while the working man starves.

This is also a hilarious failure mode to an actual insurgency wherein the right wing insurgents fixate on killing left wing insurgents (or vice versa) instead of actually targeting the system and accomplishing their goals.
Unironically, this is the only way I see the Right-wing winning any sort of Civil War. Sparking off a completely separate rebellion right as the faggots lose theirs or at least hold the US government down occupying the cities. Man-in-the-middle logistics attacks, followed by some cowboy warlord cannibal-rapist shit that people haven't ever planned for its so dark and horrifying.

Suddenly East St. Louis is gassed with carfentanyl by what appears to be the US Air Force, and only years later turns out to be some Fashy types who infiltrated every level of society as a terrorist cell would. Then completely unaffiliated warlords start holding areas down along some important rural highways at key points, each far too weak but bedlam together. King James-Robert MacGillecuddy rules a few states after the rest die but the Armed Forces became too weak and retreated to the Greater New England Commonwealth and Great Lakes Republic.

Just a fucking mess, everywhere all at once until nothing can be done. Anything else will fail unless it somehow gets legitimacy from the people in its territory and America loses it due to some terrifying urban drone strike on tape.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Raoul_Duke
A few hundred tactical missile strikes and every single dissenter dead. Rebellion/revolution is quite literally impossible. Shit like CHAZ or Burn Loot Murder riots would've been shut down in seconds if the government actually tried to stop them, and that's being generous. The biggest trick the powers that be pulled on people is convincing them the government's inefficient and capable of being resisted; it works exactly as planned, and if/when they decide it, resistance is futile.
 
ATTENTION GLOW NIGGERS THE FOLLOWING IS BUT A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT. YOU WOULDNT ARREST A PHYSICS TEACHER FOR TALKING ABOUT AN ATOMIC BOMB FOR EDUCATION PURPOSES
@President Joe Biden
can't directly reply but
1. I think the reason they're trying to switch out electrical grid underground instead of poles is to make them a bit secure. That is honestly why I think they're doing it since underground electrical lines pose their own economic problems.
2. Desertion would definitely be an issue but I believe the main military would still have an advantage. if 75% did desert they would go their own separate ways and not necessarily fight together. The main army would gather their resources to go after the small groups of deserters
4. Outside influence is definitely an issue but with America occupied I believe wars would break out throughout the world. For better or worst America keeps the peace in the developed world and nobody wants to fucm with our budget. no American intervention means nows the chance
5. The US gov. would definitely be shitting themselves. BLM, antifa, libertarians, etc, would not only fight each other but the legitimate government hoping to carve out a small piece of the pie.
6. logistics is definitely a nightmare and Americas success in war has been that wars don't happen at home. We can destroy a whole nation's gasoline but best they can do is destroy a few days worth when we fight overseas. The government also doesn't trust the average enlisted to get gas without permission so their bureaucracy would hurt the main army
7. If you follow the Consumer thread you see plenty of videos of social media people working for big tech and many don't do actual production. They're just there to be there. Our economy is built on a lie
8. Libs living in the ocean would honestly be their one advantage as nations trying to help them either with food or resources. If they could get their own farmland then they could actually last.
9. Honestly the best part of a civil war would watching CNN journos trying to flash their press badge and realizing they're still gonna be used for slave labor
Cops are pretty incompetent tbh. Their main advantage is 6 cops showing up to get one guy. If shits ever hit the fan then those cops would be spread out way too thin
THIS HAS BEEN A THOUGHT EXPERIMENT.
LIKE EINSTEINS RELETIVITY THOUGHT EXPERIMENT
I LOVE ISRAEL
 
Back