What would you do instead if sex didn't exist?

ToroidalBoat said:
If it never existed, then humans would have had to reproduce asexually somehow to exist. If it were ended now somehow, humans would go extinct by around a century from now.
Click to expand...
True, but that's not the point of the thread:

What kinds of attraction would exist, and how would you consummate them?
Click to expand...
This is the point. The question is what the possible replacements would be in an interpersonal rather than reproduction sense.

College Ginger Packet said:
... are some of you wondering this ???
Click to expand...
Yes, but I cannot stress enough that I am not asking where babies come from.
 
  • Autistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ToroidalBoat and Axiom.
I'd carry on as normal.

Does masturbation stop existing too or just the kind involving two or more people?
 
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Axiom.
I would imagine that cooking would become vastly more important. Loss of sexual attraction and mechanisms doesn't explicitly mean that romantic connection is gone, and bringing pleasure to a partner through food might be the conceptual substitute. Especially since we can assume that with the loss of sex as the probable top pleasure for people, food would be the next highest thing.

Instead of fucking, y'all would be baking or some shit to share the pleasures of a fresh bread.
 
  • Feels
  • Winner
Reactions: California Newt, Cnidarian and Axiom.
Heem 'em all. said:
What the fuck even is that
Click to expand...
Women can record themselves doing literally anything and financially gain from it.

Anyway: I've low sex drive and generally don't think highly of sex, and even in my lowest of lows when I yearn for a partner, I imagine what it'd be like to have sex in that moment. The awkward non-romantic physical work and adjustment; a few minutes of after-work exhaustion and a nut. Then what? Go make dinner?

I tell myself I've settled with not wanting a partner other than happenstance, and these kinda thoughts remind me of as much. I can live alone. I don't want to bone every other day of the week, so why even bother with a partner unless they truly give you reasons to engage outside sex?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Axiom.
Kuritan Deplorable said:
I would imagine that cooking would become vastly more important. Loss of sexual attraction and mechanisms doesn't explicitly mean that romantic connection is gone, and bringing pleasure to a partner through food might be the conceptual substitute. Especially since we can assume that with the loss of sex as the probable top pleasure for people, food would be the next highest thing.

Instead of fucking, y'all would be baking or some shit to share the pleasures of a fresh bread.
Click to expand...
So far, you've understood the point of the thread the best.

A universal religious theme is literally eating the god; this is typically accomplished through some kind of sacrifice which is then consumed by those present.

I could definitely see food playing a big part. Unless biology radically changed you probably couldn't eat of each other; the flesh would be dead.

@Trump's Chosen
What would I do instead if pooping didn't exist? Not poop. I wouldn't try to find some other activity on the toilet to replace it with.
Click to expand...
Pooping is not a social activity
 
Last edited:
I guess this leaves me no other option than to get to work on perfecting the craft of Sex II, otherwise known as The Second Sex as a suitable replacement.

image.webp
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Cnidarian, California Newt and UERISIMILITUDO
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back