What’s with all the drag shit?

Does anyone else smell it when you see ads for Drag Race or whatever? I get hit with a scent memory or something, it's mostly Halloween facepaint and maybe a bit of plastic, like synthetic fabric and hair goop. I get it when I see pictures of goths and clowns too. Is anyone else smelling this?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Lawgiver
Its the equivalent of minstrel shows, but socially acceptable cause it mocks women instead of blacks.

Also a man in a dress and being a complete fag is also more in line with today's standards, tho drag is a bit more bearable cause its normally just catty gay men with self awareness
I get the minstrel show comparison and in some sense agree with it, but aren't the gaylords who do drag the sort who like acting like women? That comes off more as a flattery-by-imitation thing than mockery.
 
Rupaul's Drag Race is enormously popular. It's going into its 14th season. That's part of it. Drag has been nightclub entertainment for many decades. Dame Edna Everadge had a TV show that was late night only. I never thought much of it, but then we started getting Drag Queen Story Hour with drag queens twerking in front of little kids and exposing their crotches to little kids. The degeneracy was tolerable to most people when it was confined to night clubs as adult entertainment.

It didn't take too long to slippery slope into "we must teach your kids that it's cool to be a freak" territory.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Creep3r and Moloko
I get the minstrel show comparison and in some sense agree with it, but aren't the gaylords who do drag the sort who like acting like women? That comes off more as a flattery-by-imitation thing than mockery.

Yeah I can see it more as flattery by comparison than something like "Nigga luv dey fried chikken."

Funny enough most troons hate it despite being the real mockery of women and completely missing the point of the over exaggerated feminine acts. They all know its an act and when to return to their normal lives rather than doing an extended larp fetish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pillar of Autism
Rupaul's Drag Race is enormously popular. It's going into its 14th season. That's part of it. Drag has been nightclub entertainment for many decades. Dame Edna Everadge had a TV show that was late night only. I never thought much of it, but then we started getting Drag Queen Story Hour with drag queens twerking in front of little kids and exposing their crotches to little kids. The degeneracy was tolerable to most people when it was confined to night clubs as adult entertainment.

It didn't take too long to slippery slope into "we must teach your kids that it's cool to be a freak" territory.
Wasn't Dame Edna a straight dude?
 
I remember when RuPaul's show was just a small programming block on LOGO. I would watch it with my parents and we'd laugh at the absurdity and pageantry. It was like "Chopped" for gays. It snowballed so frighteningly fast, I showed it to some fellow gay friends as a freshman in college and they made it their personality SO quickly. Now it's fucking everywhere and these people are meant to represent the community? Clown world indeed
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Creep3r and CorteXY
I get the minstrel show comparison and in some sense agree with it, but aren't the gaylords who do drag the sort who like acting like women? That comes off more as a flattery-by-imitation thing than mockery.
Yeah I can see it more as flattery by comparison than something like "Nigga luv dey fried chikken."

Funny enough most troons hate it despite being the real mockery of women and completely missing the point of the over exaggerated feminine acts. They all know its an act and when to return to their normal lives rather than doing an extended larp fetish.

Al Jolson was a big friend to black people and helped them however he could. So technically black-face was flattery-by-imitation rather then mockery. From wiki:

Jolson's legacy as the most popular performer of blackface routines was complemented by his relationships with African-Americans and his appreciation and use of African-American cultural trends.[11] Jolson first heard jazz, blues, and ragtime in the alleys of New Orleans. He enjoyed singing jazz, often performing in blackface, especially in the songs he made popular such as "Swanee", "My Mammy", and "Rock-a-Bye Your Baby with a Dixie Melody".

As a Jewish immigrant and America's most famous and highest-paid entertainer, he may have had the incentive and resources to help improve racial attitudes. While The Birth of a Nation glorified white supremacy and the KKK, Jolson chose to star in The Jazz Singer, which defied racial bigotry by introducing black musicians to audiences worldwide.[14]

While growing up, Jolson had many black friends, including Bill "Bojangles" Robinson, who became a prominent tap dancer.[22] As early as 1911, at the age of 25, Jolson was noted for fighting discrimination on Broadway and later in his movies.[130] In 1924, he promoted the play Appearances by Garland Anderson[131] which became the first production with an all-black cast produced on Broadway. He brought a black dance team from San Francisco that he tried to put in a Broadway show.[130] He demanded equal treatment for Cab Calloway, with whom he performed duets in the movie The Singing Kid.[130]

Jolson read in the newspaper that songwriters Eubie Blake and Noble Sissle, neither of whom he had ever heard of, were refused service at a Connecticut restaurant because of their race. He tracked them down and took them out to dinner, "insisting he'd punch anyone in the nose who tried to kick us out!"[11] According to biographer Al Rose, Jolson and Blake became friends and went to boxing matches together.[132]

Film historian Charles Musser notes, "African Americans' embrace of Jolson was not a spontaneous reaction to his appearance in talking pictures. In an era when African Americans did not have to go looking for enemies, Jolson was perceived a friend."[133]

Jeni LeGon, a black female tap dancer,[134] recalls her life as a film dancer: "But of course, in those times it was a 'black-and-white world.' You didn't associate too much socially with any of the stars. You saw them at the studio, you know, nice—but they didn't invite. The only ones that ever invited us home for a visit was Al Jolson and Ruby Keeler."[135]

British performer Brian Conley, former star of the 1995 British play Jolson, stated during an interview, "I found out Jolson was actually a hero to the black people of America. At his funeral, black actors lined the way, they really appreciated what he'd done for them."[136]

Noble Sissle, who was by then president of the Negro Actors Guild, represented that organization at his funeral.[137]

Jolson's physical expressiveness also affected the music styles of some black performers. Music historian Bob Gulla writes that "the most critical influence in Jackie Wilson's young life was Al Jolson." He points out that Wilson's ideas of what a stage performer could do to keep their act an "exciting" and "thrilling performance" was shaped by Jolson's acts, "full of wild writhing and excessive theatrics". Wilson felt that Jolson "should be considered the stylistic [forefather] of rock and roll."[138]

According to the St. James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture: "Almost single-handedly, Jolson helped to introduce African-American musical innovations like jazz, ragtime, and the blues to white audiences ... [and] paved the way for African-American performers like Louis Armstrong, Duke Ellington, Fats Waller, and Ethel Waters ... to bridge the cultural gap between black and white America."[14]

Amiri Baraka wrote, "the entrance of the white man into jazz ... did at least bring him much closer to the Negro." He points out that "the acceptance of jazz by whites marks a crucial moment when an aspect of black culture had become an essential part of American culture."[139]

Regardless, its fucked up how much of it is used to groom children these days.
 
Drag is essentially the equivalent of blackface for women and troons alike, yet they've somehow managed to cuck both feminists and trans activists into never daring to criticize it.

That's honestly pretty based if you ask me.

Plus, I'm pretty sure that just about none of the seething rightoids who criticize drag online would ever dare say anything to a burly drag queen's face.

Related:
084.png
 
I sense a lot of reactionary anger and resentment within drag. It seems like drag queens deliberately try to emulate a sort of farcical image and coping distress that's hard to put into words. I imagine it to root from conscience-driven self-hate - like in cases where one's conscience bites for being how one is but in the lust for gratification, one keeps on sticking to that which makes one resent one's self.
 
RuPaul's Drag Race pushed it into the mainstream and let the freak flag fly a little too proudly.
“Drag Brunch” is really popular here with normie liberal suburban women. They eat pancakes and drink prosecco as they throw money at the drag queens while they lip sync to some shit. Those bitches are raking in the dough.
 
Drag is essentially the equivalent of blackface for women and troons alike, yet they've somehow managed to cuck both feminists and trans activists into never daring to criticize it.

That's honestly pretty based if you ask me.

Plus, I'm pretty sure that just about none of the seething rightoids who criticize drag online would ever dare say anything to a burly drag queen's face.

Related:
084.png
>Our trannies are better than your trannies
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Crabouse-united
Drag was better less bad when it was just about gay men dressing up ridiculously, being bitchy, sassy and drunk/high on stage, and lipsyncing. Nowadays it's devolved (even further) to mostly histrionic pre-troons all about muh gender and muh disorder and muh true and honest authentic self.

It's exhausting.
 
I used to think it was mildly entertaining years ago in the sense that "haha, that's clearly a man with balloons in his shirt acting overdramatic." But now it's become an entirely different monster. It's like dragqueens are deities and demand to be treated as symbols of power, instead of what they actually are, a cheap comedy act.

It's also always been overtly sexual so idk why the retards over at the alphabet headquarters decided they would be the mascot for marketing towards children.

That Blues Clues drag queen bit with the mastectomy beavers (GOD that sounds wrong) was going around Twitter again today and I was thinking about this same thing. Kids are naturally disturbed and put off by ugly men in over the top women's pageant clothes. I have seen it again and again. Only exception is when the kid has been conditioned from a VERY early age to put up with it. And I think that's what they are doing here- they are imposing their will on kids, and figure if they can get kids to not instantly, instinctively reject a 300 lb man in a glittery demon costume, the kids will passively accept any amount of perversion and creepiness that would otherwise set off all their "WRONG DANGER BAD" alarms.

Fuck that is even more disturbing than I thought it would be.

It's 50% fetish, 50% dressing pedophiles like clowns so the middle aged wine moms think it's just a silly and fun form of entertainment. Drag is hugely popular among white women, because it was designed to be. It's a way to get past their defenses undetected and gain access to their children, who are also fooled by the disguise and are less likely to resist "fun touch time" because clowns are fun.

In short, it's Emsleyan mimicry.
Oh that is a good find, I will use this terminology in the future.
 
It's demonic.

Read your book.
Atheist I may be, but oh yes, I've had experience with things that can be likened to demons. Thinking that dressing as the opposite gender and prancing has anything to do with them just makes me smile and chuckle at how naive and ignorant you are about the topic. That said....
Bawdy humour for adults was fine. The drag queen story hour is the real horror show.
Pretty much this. That was a peak troon tolerance loss moment for me, finding out they didn't vett out a fUCKING SEX OFFENDER.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Creep3r
Atheist I may be, but oh yes, I've had experience with things that can be likened to demons. Thinking that dressing as the opposite gender and prancing has anything to do with them just makes me smile and chuckle at how naive and ignorant you are about the topic.
:neckbeard:
About sums it up, really.
 
:neckbeard:
About sums it up, really.
Fedora tippers don't even believe in demons, cupcake. Does anyone going against Christianity automatically get the "HUrr durrr, tip your fedora BROOOONY" reaction from you?

Also, MLP is little girl shit. Anyone into it needs to be kept away from kids.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Creep3r
Fedora tippers don't even believe in demons, cupcake. Does anyone going against Christianity automatically get the "HUrr durrr, tip your fedora BROOOONY" reaction from you?

Also, MLP is little girl shit. Anyone into it needs to be kept away from kids.
NOOOOO it's nawt troo it's not troo NO ITS NOT TROO and if I had to guess I'd say that you're the one who's a buttblasted fedoratipper
 
NOOOOO it's nawt troo it's not troo NO ITS NOT TROO and if I had to guess I'd say that you're the one who's a buttblasted fedoratipper
"If yur not Christian, you're a fedora tipper!" Fuck off.
 
I sometimes wonder if it's a form of both mocking women and mocking queer people. Where for the queers who like it, it's a way of doing both, with self mockery. With a bunch of straight people, often unaware not quite understanding they are also mocking women and queer people. The current acceptance of drag as LGBTIQ&$%+ means they think they're embracing an identity. So they don't question it.

I also think there's a level of performative acceptance of it. Where people don't really get it or like it. Yet they just have to make the comments about "how fabulous" it is. Or otherwise, they'll be a bad person. I've observed on TV people with dead eyes saying how wonderful drag queens and shows are. Where it's almost like a deer in headlights. You can't be anything but positive.
 
Back