What's worse: molesting a dog or molesting an underaged minor who had her papers I swear?

I get both sides have a "this seems worse cuz" argue but ask yourselves one thing:

Why?

Considering this in general is already a "get help" signal. Both are yikes, no thanks.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Dee Price
Lol this is the kind of question you don't answer, but I'm drunk so here it goes. Beastiality is always going to be an abomination worthy of death by burning at the stake. It doesn't particularly matter what the circumstances are behind it unless it's some inconceivable situation like someone holding a gun to your mum's head and demanding you shag a ______ (if the gun is to your head, just take the bullet). Pedophilia, while still an abomination worthy of burning on a pyre, is slightly more malleable. Scientifically, it's the age at which you reach sexual maturity, which is not a fixed thing but rather variable to a certain degree. To account for this variability the law has set certain limits in place, which are granted, somewhat arbitrary (they don't have a choice but to be arbitrary). Now let's assume that the law is just purely based on science. For both males and females it tends to take four years to complete puberty from start to finish. On average (there are a few outliers here) females begin puberty at 11 years, and males begin puberty at 12 years. This would make 15 the minimum for females, and 16 the minimum for males. Obviously, you run into some issues here since, for one, those are not even, and two, scientifically while you reach sexual maturity at these ages, you're not actually neurologically mature until much later (25 according to many neurologists). This creates a situation where on the extremes of either end, one could define under15F/16M, or under 25F&M as pedophilia. This leaves a gray zone in pedophilia, which is not really present in bestiality.

TLDR:
@Miss Tommie Jayne Wasserberg should burn at the stake, regardless of the text wall above.
Well spoken. Thank you for the incredible presentation.
A child. Sure, molesting a dog is terrible, but it’s not like the dog was going to study neurochemistry or anything. The trauma of molestation can destroy a life and even lead to a cycle of abuse where the victim becomes an abuser.

In the specific case of Sabrina, Tom deliberately fudges many of the details, because he knows that what he did was evil. It seems that her life was already on a downward spiral when she had the misfortune of meeting him. Tom describes her as a runaway who’d already been raped. His version of how he came to sleep with her is missing many details - apparently she spontaneously went from total disinterest to willingly inviting this ugly, aggressive man into bed. The indication here is that coercion took place, if not outright force.

What happened afterwards? Tom has no details, other than lamely stating that she is a “grandmother.” Obviously Tom is a misogynist for whom the duty of a woman is simply to serve men and reproduce, but it’s strange that he won’t provide any information about her actual life beyond “at some point she had kids.”

Generally it seems that if you end up in Tom’s social circle, you’re already at rock bottom.
If they are with tom it is definitely that they hit rock bottom. and worse they have been captured but the bridge troll tom to be exploited until no longer useful.
I know everyone hates Tommie, but it could be worse. He could've molested a puppy.
I am sure he did And it was probably Lady when she was a puppy which is why she did what she did for old man like me rape a child and finger a dog.
 
Back