Opinion When Must We Kill Them? - Evil has come to America.

Edit 04/18/2025: Well didn’t that get quite a reception! The response has been far greater than I anticipated; I was certainly impressed by the inventiveness and facility of my interlocutors. I wish to make a few points clear. Violence is a last resort, not a first resort. It must come after the exhaustion of all possible remedy. It is not, moreover, appropriate for decisions which are merely unwise or disastrous. It is to be employed only in defense of our Constitution, and of democracy. If it is resorted to, it must be narrowly targeted, and aimed only at extirpating those who have power, and are unjustly resisting giving it up.

Evil has come to America. The present administration is engaged in barbarism; it has arbitrarily imprisoned its opponents, revoked the visas of thousands of students, imposed taxes upon us without our consent, and seeks to destroy the institutions which oppose it. Its leader has threatened those who produce unfavorable coverage, and suggested that their licenses be revoked. It has deprived us, in many cases, of trial by jury; it has subjected us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and has transported us beyond seas to be imprisoned for pretended offenses. It has scorned the orders of our courts, and threatens to alter fundamentally our form of government. It has pardoned its thugs, and extorted the lawyers who defended its opponents.

If these actions become normal, the government could arrest anyone and deport them to prison in a foreign land, without hope of redress, for no reason. It is nothing less than the total abdication of rule of law in this country. There is no guard or protection against it. If this theory prevails, then it is the end of America as a free nation.

I do not wish for this essay to be a mere catalogue of outrages. The conduct of the present administration is as well known to you as it is to myself, and can be understood by any sensible person. On it, no further comment is ventured.

What remains for us to decide is when we fight. If the present administration wills it, it could sweep away the courts, it could sweep away democracy, and it could sweep away freedom. Protest is useful only insofar as it can effect action. Our words might sway the hearts of men, but not of beasts.

If the present administration chooses this course, then the questions of the day can be settled not with legislation, but with blood and iron. In short, we must decide when we must kill them. None of us wish for war, but if the present administration wishes to destroy the nation I would accept war rather than see it perish. I hope that you would choose the same.

But what to do? The rot of the present administration runs deeper than one man. The sacrifice of a hero is insufficient to save our nation, and a gust of wind on a summer day would not have saved us. For let us make no mistake; the problem is not one man, but a whole class of people. If one head is cut off, another would take its place.

Violence only makes sense as part of coordinated strategy. This is why protests are important – not as a way of changing the present administration’s actions, but as a way to coordinate a group. There may come a time when we shall have no guarantee of freedom but the one which we make for ourselves. If it comes, I tell you that there is no greater honor than he who lays down his life for his friends. Until then, we must wait.

And when is that time? Your threshold may differ from mine, but you must have one. If the present administration should cancel elections; if it should engage in fraud in the electoral process; if it should suppress the speech of its opponents, and jail its political adversaries; if it ignores the will of Congress; if it should directly spurn the orders of the court; all these are reasons for revolution. It may be best to stave off, and wait for elections to throw out this scourge; but if it should threaten the ability to remove it, we shall have no choice. We will have to do the right thing. We will have to prepare ourselves to die. I hope that we should conduct ourselves with such courage that it will be our finest hour; I expect that we shall do our duty.

While we wait, we must not be like sheep to the slaughter. We cannot cooperate. We must hide those who are persecuted; we must foil the aims of their agents. The state and local governments which we control can litigate the actions of the present administration. Their police can refuse to share information or be deputized to do the work of the evil ones. If war is politics by other means, then politics is war by other means. There can be no surrender, for surrender means the oppression of all of us.

These are exceptional times! We have not faced such a threat in many years. I wish that it had not come. It is the sorrow of the world that these times have come, and it is we who shall have to bring woe unto those through whom it came.

The future is not certain. It may be that the present administration should flinch, and turn back in face of lighter action. I fondly hope that that may be the case. But if it comes, we must awaken from this ignorant dream. This evil will not pass without blood, sweat, toil, and tears. So harden your hearts, and be prepared to die.

Article Link

Archive
 
People like this talk about violence as a matter of course, but they wouldn't know anything about it. As insane as I think the American left is right now, I don't think they would have any success pursuing violence for the simple fact that most police officers are conservative and most military combat soldiers are conservative. The American political system has never responded well to open partisan violence and the last time it was attempted, the belligerents lost spectacularly and their descendants are still assmad about it. People like this author fancy themselves as revolutionaries and then get shot in their stupid heads by the Stalin types of their own movement who do understand violence. Or they lose, expect some gracious exit where they retire and write books, and look like a deer in headlights when they get the Ceausescu treatment.

As someone who has been in seriously fucked up and violent situations, it always blows my mind when soft academic types talk about it like it's nothing. They so fundamentally misunderstand it and they do not realize, when they say shit like this, the rest of us take them seriously; and they do not understand the consequences of that.
People who have never been in a situation where they have to decide am I willing to seriously fuck up someone don't understand that it's not easy that first time, and indecision almost always results in their being the one that gets fucked up. Even more so when the decision is am I willing to kill this other person
 
The kind of violence this person would participate in is not warzone combat, but rather handling your papers DMV style in a kind of disaffected way before you were shuffled off to another department for the bullet application procedure, which they would literally never lose any sleep about. Which sounds impotent, but is a way more dangerous kind of person, really.
 
Is this faggot seriously calling for open violent revolt because the law is being upheld?

What is wrong with leftoids?
They don't believe in law and order. They don't believe in logic or reason. They don't believe in facts or feelings.

Leftoids believe in power. Facts that help them gain power are good. Facts that cost them power are declared haram ("hateful") and must be ignored. Logic, laws, none of it matters if it costs them a single iota of power and influence.

Trump being elected to do something the left doesn't like is fundamentally invalid to them, no matter what the situation, because it inherently rejects the idea that the left should have all the power forever. A majority (supermajority in the case of some things, like removing illegals) of America supporting him? That doesn't matter. He's doing something they disagree with and that defies their power and that means it's fundamentally invalid.

This is Post-Modernist thought. Half of what we call Intersectionality or Woke.

This is just the beginning. History doesn't repeat but it sure does rhyme, and this shit all happened already in the 70s. Economic crash, bunch of marxist terrorists thinking the world supported them, et cetera. They're calling for violence now, but I wager in less than a year, they'll start up the Days of Rage again. Pipe bombs, attacking "enemies of the party," that sort of deal. Something like the Summer of Love, only worse, way worse, because the cognitive dissonance of everyone rejecting them when they "know" they're on the "right side of history" will drive them absolutely fucking batshit.
 
People who have never been in a situation where they have to decide am I willing to seriously fuck up someone don't understand that it's not easy that first time, and indecision almost always results in their being the one that gets fucked up. Even more so when the decision is am I willing to kill this other person
It's even worse than that: these types of people are willing to walk up to the line and then shout from it, as if being in a society is a magical protective barrier. Once you put your hands on them, they either buckle or they freak out and any skills they actually have go out the window because they were not prepared to actually be in a fight.

There are people who bark a lot and can also kill you, made even more dangerous by possessing weapons, but those are thugs. That is the type of person who goes on to be a Joseph Stalin. The guy who wrote this article is not a thug. He is a pajama boy who does not understand what he is actually proposing or its necessary outcomes. He imagines other people doing the killing, not him.
 
Here's the thing the men who made up the red army were at least World War One veterans or had some military experience I can say a lot of things about Leon Trotsky but he was somewhat of a skilled military organizer too bad he was an unlikable Jew and looked like Colonel Sandals ugly cousin.
Here's the thing all those white supremacists I mean actual white supremacists would love a civil war logan use it to clean out the local ghettos or
Decide to do some **** and span cleaning.
Everyone who holds left leaning opinions needs to be slowly cooked alive and fed to a bunch of starving African children
 
Lol.
LMFAO.

This is supposed to be intimidating? To who?
If you try to push such trollish petty tyranny on me and others, Guess where you'll find center-left folks like me?

Armed to the teeth with right wing people we know who we mostly only disagree with on hard political and economic policy.

Fuck you, soyboy faggot literal aspie. You'll find a lot of people on both sides of the aisle that won't stand for a takeover of freedom by the squishmallow dirtbag left and your enablers. If you think Trump is bad, well, keep pushing your vile bullshit.

I really can't tell if this is real. This sounds like something a basement AI would come up with.
 
"We only resort to violence as a last option when the system has failed"

"The system's complete and irrecoverable failure is self obvious from the fact that we have demanded all the power and not been given it"
Same vibes as Fat Al getting shown his tweets by Mace saying that judges(?) should never know peace, and sputtering out, I meant peacefully...
Yeah dude, they should peacefully never know peace.

These people need to fuck off.
 
Back