When the average Leftist bitches about Nazis, is it sincere or just an insult?

It's just something they heard that someone told them is bad.

They don't know what nazism was or why it was bad.

The irony is lost on them that all of their beliefs Mirror hitler
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chadikus Maximus
Too much thunking at play here IMO. You know how small children will often hear certain words and then use them as descriptors for anything and everything? Same concept at play with leftoids calling everything nahtzee, there's no actual thought going into what and why they are simply enunciating the neuron connection between their ears.
The sooner left/right wing shit gets properly cast aside as the archaic childishness that it is the better.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Chadikus Maximus, Super Mario Brothers, Bababooey Warlock and 1 other person
WielkiWapiesz2137 said:
Large amount of them are sincere about it, as their definition of Nazism is the retarded nonsense that umberto eco came up with, which can be boiled down to pure aesthetics, ie according to them, anything that looks remotely alike to Nazism is Nazism.
Click to expand...

Umberto Eco's list pretty much describes the human spirit except for disgenic white lefties. Some hotpicks:

1. The cult of tradition Because the brown people are itching for their temples to be turned into tranny clinics.

2. Rejectionism of modernism No, no, Mohammed, my naive friend. Your wife would feel far more empowered if she got her beaver out on the internet.

5. Fear of difference Thank goodness it's only the Nazis who bicker over race, ethnicity and religion.

11. Everyone is educated to become a hero Let's encourage our sons to become fat masturbators instead.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Luigi Cadorna, CloverKitty, Chadikus Maximus and 4 others
They do sincerely believe their enemies are all literal Nazis, but they don't quite know what that means. And it doesn't really matter, it's just about distinguishing between the in- and out-group, friend and foe. There's the vague idea what a Nazi is, just enough to know that they're the enemy, and how to recognize them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CloverKitty, Chadikus Maximus, Vernon Dozier and 3 others
Just going to quote my buddy @Evo:
Evo said:
Should be noted calling someone 'fascist' even when they're not fascist has been something Communists have done for decades, literal generations, ever since the Soviet Union - it's an old tactic popularized by Marxian notions of dialectics that will 'force the enemy out' and 'force class conflict' by strategically dividing groups via rhetoric and turning labels into political weapons/bogeymen that they can use to attempt to goad people into thinking they're the bad guy for opposing said class conflict - they also believe that the revolution is determined by its' ability to combat fascism and that fascism is the end result of all capitalistic and/or bourgeois systems, so therefore even if the fascists have not themselves become popular, you must essentially make them into a presence and thing so the revolution has a proper enemy.

tl;dr: they're insane
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Agree
Reactions: CloverKitty, Enjoy_the_Soylence, Vernon Dozier and 3 others
I think it's mostly sincere, but ultimately lazy on enough levels that when some far leftist crackpot calls you a nazi for disagreeing with them, the best method of dealing with it is to ignore it if you don't feel like simply laughing at them for being a moron. Nobody who slings fascist or nazi around at people that disagree with them should be taken seriously, because none of them have any concept of what German national socialism was, or why it became dominant after the Weimar Republic in the first place. It's just a lazy insult to people like that, since everyone who disagrees with them is automatically a nazi, and people like that are too ignorant to see how overuse of that and other words just cheapens their impact.
 
It's emotionally manipulative bullshit from man-children who haven't been slapped and told to shut up often enough.
I find agreeing with them makes them angrier.
 
they just want to kill evryone that doesn't agree, hence the "nazi" argument, if you are one why should you be alive ?.
 
They do really think we're going to skin all niggers alive and castrate faggots and if we get too much power, the whole world will be struck by a nuclear war and then die from climate change.
 
When a liberal uses the word "Nazi", they just mean "Straight, white male who is unwilling to be cucked". It's a typical problem with liberals, where definitions are just whatever they want them to be. Ask them to define the word "fascist" for extra amusement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CloverKitty and Chadikus Maximus
Beautiful Border said:
This is then given teeth with the concept of the "paradox of tolerance" - of course, what the paradox of tolerance actually demonstrates is that unlimited tolerance is a self-defeating concept. Instead of taking away from this "making tolerance your highest moral principle is unviable", they instead come to the oxymoronic conclusion that"we have to be intolerant of intolerance".
Click to expand...
I love when people misrepresent that philosopher you could easily say that every single leftist should be ye put in prison if you actually use his philosophy.
Basically Antifa since they believe in punching people for disagreeing with them would not be allowed in the paradox of tolerance neither would Islam.
But no one actually reads his books he never advocates for hate speech laws he actually is against them

They 100 percent do believe the people they are fighting their national socialists they create their own definition of it though which is literally anything to the left of your standard communist extremist.

Is the thing actual national socialist don't care if you call them national socialists they have no problem with you saying that to them my friends who are Nazis are like what's up my Nazi and they don't care because the Nazis
 
  • Like
Reactions: CloverKitty and Chadikus Maximus
Sometimes it's a way to defeat an opponent and assure their monopol on, say, charity or organizing youth by discrediting those who aren't communist.
If anyone else than radical lefties organizes youth, it's inherently wrong, nobody else can do that. No one else will be better in it and be more popular with kids, can't be.

Rivality between commies and actual nazis originates in the fact that they were attracting and taking over people from each other.
 
It's sincere but it's also an insult. They tend to view anything right wing outside of their own worldview as a disease that either needs to be contained or stomped out entirely. If someone on their team gets the ick any unorthodox opinions, they promptly get kicked out. Insulting them is a strategy in preventing people on their team from getting wrong thought, and to discourage any dissenters from speaking.

The Alt Right Playbook is an example of this. That being said it's been years since I've watched it so I don't know how it is now.
 
anyone right of center (or even insufficiently left of center) for them is a Nazi, Reddit is a huge example of Goodwins Law, anyone who criticizes the hive mind or their behavior is a nazi
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back