- Joined
- Jun 21, 2023
More socialists compared to the US. European socialism is not 100% socialism. I believe they call it democratic socialism.Huh?
I agree. Countries should invest in their own populations. If we only had to deal with our own poor people it would be affordable. But you can't take in low IQ turd people from third world shitholes and give them the same social bennies.Developed countries (think most of Europe) should invest in the well being of their population. It worked well, having safety nets and not being barred from anything because you were born poor did help a lot. Taxpayers didn't want bums on the street and people who can't afford shit, so they were fine with social housing projects.
It was a good trade between having hungry, stinky homeless dudes with nothing to lose pushed to crime and someone who has a dwelling, some income and can afford to buy the bare minimum. The latter would actually have a chance to build up and become useful for society.
Disaster ensued when some very retarded people decided that all the rest of the world is OUR responsibility and sheltered low IQ animals from shithole countries, somehow thinking they will manage to behave like human beings. Fast forward until today.
Place called Europe, please do not redeem.
It's the same way in the US. We have no combination of that either. At least till Trump came along. Trumps not 100% but he is getting close and he scares the hell out of the political establishment in the US. For decades Americans were stuck with having to vote for Republicans or Democrats. Trump takes the good points of both parties and throws the bad ones in the garbage. They don't like this. The people in power liked having Americans scurrying like mice back and forth between the two parties. When the Republicans got out of hand it was back to the Democrats. When the Democrats started acting up it was back to the Republicans. Democrats are viewed as the US version of the UK's labor party. At least they were. I know some people still see them as the party that stands up for the poor and working class. The republicans were seen as the defender of the rich and country club types. It's funny that it took a rich man to come along and stop this.And yet not a single party I can think of offers that combination of social conservatism and economic liberalism. Of any pop up they’re slapped down very hard
Isn’t that odd?