whiny babies at Yale University confront instructor over [!]TRIGGERING[!] halloween costume e-mail

this is considered the right thing to do these days

ffs kill all millennials #SocialMediaEugenics

EDIT:

the e-mail in question:
Dear Sillimanders:

Nicholas and I have heard from a number of students who were frustrated by the mass email sent to the student body about appropriate Halloweenwear. I’ve always found Halloween an interesting embodiment of more general adult worries about young people. As some of you may be aware, I teach a class on “The Concept of the Problem Child,” and I was speaking with some of my students yesterday about the ways in which Halloween – traditionally a day of subversion for children and young people – is also an occasion for adults to exert their control.

When I was young, adults were freaked out by the specter of Halloween candy poisoned by lunatics, or spiked with razor blades (despite the absence of a single recorded case of such an event). Now, we’ve grown to fear the sugary candy itself. And this year, we seem afraid that college students are unable to decide how to dress themselves on Halloween. I don’t wish to trivialize genuine concerns about cultural and personal representation, and other challenges to our lived experience in a plural community. I know that many decent people have proposed guidelines on Halloween costumes from a spirit of avoiding hurt and offense. I laud those goals, in theory, as most of us do. But in practice, I wonder if we should reflect more transparently, as a community, on the consequences of an institutional (which is to say: bureaucratic and administrative) exercise of implied control over college students.

It seems to me that we can have this discussion of costumes on many levels: we can talk about complex issues of identify, free speech, cultural appropriation, and virtue “signalling.” But I wanted to share my thoughts with you from a totally different angle, as an educator concerned with the developmental stages of childhood and young adulthood.

As a former preschool teacher, for example, it is hard for me to give credence to a claim that there is something objectionably “appropriative” about a blondehaired child’s wanting to be Mulan for a day. Pretend play is the foundation of most cognitive tasks, and it seems to me that we want to be in the business of encouraging the exercise of imagination, not constraining it. I suppose we could agree that there is a difference between fantasizing about an individual character vs. appropriating a culture, wholesale, the latter of which could be seen as (tacky)(offensive)(jejeune)(hurtful), take your pick. But, then, I wonder what is the statute of limitations on dreaming of dressing as Tiana the Frog Princess if you aren’t a black girl from New Orleans? Is it okay if you are eight, but not 18? I don’t know the answer to these questions; they seem unanswerable. Or at the least, they put us on slippery terrain that I, for one, prefer not to cross.

Which is my point. I don’t, actually, trust myself to foist my Halloweenish standards and motives on others. I can’t defend them anymore than you could defend yours. Why do we dress up on Halloween, anyway? Should we start explaining that too? I’ve always been a good mimic and I enjoy accents. I love to travel, too, and have been to every continent but Antarctica. When I lived in Bangladesh, I bought a sari because it was beautiful, even though I looked stupid in it and never wore it once. Am I fetishizing and appropriating others’ cultural experiences? Probably. But I really, really like them too. Even if we could agree on how to avoid offense – and I’ll note that no one around campus seems overly concerned about the offense taken by religiously conservative folks to skinrevealing costumes – I wonder, and I am not trying to be provocative: Is there no room anymore for a child or young person to be a little bit obnoxious… a little bit inappropriate or provocative or, yes, offensive? American universities were once a safe space not only for maturation but also for a certain regressive, or even transgressive, experience;increasingly, it seems, they have become places of censure and prohibition. And the censure and prohibition come from above, not from yourselves! Are we all okay with this transfer of power? Have we lost faith in young people's capacity – in your capacity to exercise selfcensure, through social norming, and also in your capacity to ignore or reject things that trouble you? We tend to view this shift from individual to institutional agency as a tradeoff between libertarian vs. liberal values (“liberal” in the American, not European sense of the word).

Nicholas says, if you don’t like a costume someone is wearing, look away, or tell them you are offended. Talk to each other. Free speech and the ability to tolerate offence are the hallmarks of a free and open society.

But – again, speaking as a child development specialist – I think there might be something missing in our discourse about the exercise of free speech (including how we dress ourselves) on campus, and it is this: What does this debate about Halloween costumes say about our view of young adults, of their strength and judgment?

In other words: Whose business is it to control the forms of costumes of young people? It's not mine, I know that.

Happy Halloween.
 
I'm still of the belief that 25 should be a marker of adulthood for more things based on the fact that the brain is not fully developed until then. This just kinda proves my point.

It's unworkable. Also, if you did that, you'd have to give the idiots other protections, like not being able to sign contracts or do business, or have jobs.

Or go to war, the main use for young male dumbfucks.

If anything, we should be forcing people to mature earlier if at all possible. Adding 7 more years of coddling isn't going to help things.
 
If these lazy cunts don't want to go to class or do their homework, I'm sure there are plenty of actual, real, oppressed PoCs who would be glad to take their place at Yale and actually put in some effort at getting an education.

Pakistan: Girl shot in the head by the Taliban for pushing for women's education (A laudable goal indeed)
America: Girl gets laughed at on twitter because she acted like a banshee in front of an older person

The two somehow don't equate, methinks.
 
Pakistan: Girl shot in the head by the Taliban for pushing for women's education (A laudable goal indeed)
America: Girl gets laughed at on twitter because she acted like a banshee in front of an older person

The two somehow don't equate, methinks.

I'd really like to hear SJW's trying to argue that getting shot in the head is somehow a lesser act of oppression to having to listen to a history lecture about slavery or being the only black person in a room full of white people (gasp!).

I'm so glad I live in Europe.
 
http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/13/yale-protesters-demand-school-give-them-8-million-or-else/

Along with the money for cultural centers, students also call for Yale to create a new “ethnic studies” distributional requirement for all Yale students, to be accompanied by the elevation of the school’s “Ethnicity, Race, and Migration” program to a full department, on par with traditional departments such as history and physics. Within this new department, they want various racial studies programs, including one for “Chicanx and Latinx Studies,” a way of describing Hispanic studies that avoids the use of gender inherent in “Latino” or “Chicano.”

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/13/y...ol-give-them-8-million-or-else/#ixzz3rRkgsPHo

If Yale gives into these demands it is doomed. No rich person is going to want to send their kids there, and money will eventually dry up.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Frank_Jaeger
Yale needs a Department of Latex Studies, under Engineering and Material Science.

$8M or else? Or else what? They can resign at any time if they find Yale so triggering.
 
ADF might get his own department at fucking Yale!? Pfft, still not gonna get his balls removed.

Seriously though, a whole new department dedicated to useless degrees and mandatory classes on bullshit? $8 million? These motherfuckers are dreaming pretty damn big.
 
To be fair $8M is pocket change to trust-fund babies. If they want that shit why don't they ask mommy to write a check?

They can even name the school after themselves: Sylythxex (syl/syls/sylself) School of Snowflakex Studies.
 
If Yale gives into these demands it is doomed. No rich person is going to want to send their kids there, and money will eventually dry up.

What they should do is offer them an opportunity to withdraw from all their classes and drop out. Generously, they shouldn't get failing grades in the classes so it won't mess up their transcript, and they can go somewhere more to their liking.

The vacancies should be filled from the no doubt lengthy wait list of people who actually want to be there.
 
Back