Off-Topic Whiteknight Containment Thread

Hey Gaston, you just admitted Nick is gay.

You just admitted you have poor reading comprehension skills.

It would make Nick more money long term if he can get young men to ruin their lives for AF.

In what way would it be more profitable for Nick to keep his fans poor? How does that work? How is it to Nick's advantage for his fans to have less money?

Holy shit, you people are fucking dumb.

Every cult gets its members to cut ties with the outside world to make them more dependent on the "group"
Aryan Brotherhood does the same thing as AF,

The Aryan Brotherhood is a prison gang. It's pretty hard to stay in touch with the outside world when you're IN FUCKING PRISON.

The metal retardation of you guys should not still be surprising to me and yet it is. Just when I think it can't get more retard, y'all take it to another level.

Anti Whites don’t engage in this sophistry when attacking Whites-if you descend from Europeans you are a target-regardless of whether you have some African ancestry due to being Cajun or a bit of Cherokeee.

Exactly this. Say I do my 23 and Me and it turns out that I'm 12% Cherokee. It's not like anyone would say "Well, in that case, you are only 88% privileged. You should only feel 88% guilty about slavery." They would still hang me right alongside the 100% pure Bavarian phenotypes.

Blacks get really annoyed at whites who do the whole "I'm 1/16 blah blah" shtick and for good reason. They know that person does not truly identify as non-white nor does anyone else see them that way. They experience life as a white person.
 
Okay, gotta say all of this stuff about Cajuns and “what is White” is so disingenuous.

Anti Whites don’t engage in this sophistry when attacking Whites-if you descend from Europeans you are a target-regardless of whether you have some African ancestry due to being Cajun or a bit of Cherokeee.

If anti Whites say a specific segment of the White population is White-then for all intents and purposes it is.

Anything else is Poltard nonsense.
Cope harder, nigger.
 
I can't imagine the mindset of someone who makes a post like this.

"This guy has been called "gay" 7,482 times in this thread already. I need to make it 7,483!"
I should know better than to give you attention, because I know that's what you crave, but I just need to say this definitively, because I keep seeing this kind of tired, uninspiring "defense" whenever an internet smart guy is challenged. And I say this not just to you, but to every mouth-breather everywhere; pointing out that somebody is making the same joke about you over and over is not an own. It has never been an own. It will never be an own. It is a non-statement from someone who has literally nothing else to fire back with. At best it points out that your opposition is uncreative which means nothing if you and your associates are being accused of doing much worse (being a homosexual zoomer cult for example).
 
Hey, kids! Did you miss me? The question was rhetorical. Of course you did.

Anyway, let's get into it.


Well, at least one person here thinks I'm white.


The definition of a grifter is someone who professes beliefs insincerely in order to maximize profits. There ae some things Nick does that run counter to profit maximization.
For example, I don't think Nick promotes the incel thing because he thinks that will make him money. In fact, it probably costs him some support. There are a lot people who say "I like Nick. He's smart and has good ideas but I just can't get on board with the whole woman-hating thing". If Nick were a totally cynical Machiavel, he would drop it. But Nick doesn't care if it loses him support. He promotes it as a matter of principle.
You could say the same about Nick's unwavering loyalty to Beardson, Baked Alaska, and Ethan Ralph. That probably costs him some support. It would be easier for Nick to ditch those guys just to take that talking point away from his enemies but he doesn't as a matter of principle.



AOC said that the US should cut funding to Israel. What are the groypers supposed to do? Say "That's bad because AOC said it"? How would be that be consistent?

IMO, there is a lot to like about the Bernie Left. They are woke on the Deep State and are reliably anti-war. Some are even semi-redpilled on Jews. They are correct in identifying a lot of the problem with society. Where they go wrong is their proposed solutions to those problems.


Don't care.


You wish.
So your position on Fuentes’ incel spergouts is that he’s just a genuinely resentful misogynist who repels normal people, rather than a cynical guy exploiting incel losers? How is that even a fucking defence, it makes him look awful. The truth is that ANY explanation casts him in a negative light, which should indicate to you that the guy is bad news.
 
I should know better than to give you attention, because I know that's what you crave, but I just need to say this definitively, because I keep seeing this kind of tired, uninspiring "defense" whenever an internet smart guy is challenged. And I say this not just to you, but to every mouth-breather everywhere; pointing out that somebody is making the same joke about you over and over is not an own. It has never been an own. It will never be an own. It is a non-statement from someone who has literally nothing else to fire back with. At best it points out that your opposition is uncreative which means nothing if you and your associates are being accused of doing much worse (being a homosexual zoomer cult for example).

I had never seen anyone use the punctuation the way you do and it inspired me to do some Googling. Lo and behold, it turns out that there ARE some cases when you are supposed to precede the word "but" with a comma (if you are connecting two independent clauses). I did not know that.

So this is correct because it connects two independent clauses.
I should know better than to give you attention, because I know that's what you crave, but I just need to say this definitively,
But these are not two independent clauses so this is incorrect.
And I say this not just to you, but to every mouth-breather everywhere; pointing out that somebody is making the same joke about you over and over is not an own.

I had no idea that rule existed. Is it not enforced or have I just not been noticing? I can not recall ever seeing it before.

And what's even more fucked up is that there ARE some very rare occasions when using a comma before "because" is correct. Well fuck me running. Mind blown.
This is not such an occasion.
I should know better than to give you attention, because I know that's what you crave,
Nor is this
but I just need to say this definitively, because I keep seeing this kind of tired, uninspiring "defense"
But there ARE some occasions where it would be proper.

Huh... Well, I guess you learn something new every day. I'm not going to start using either of those rules any more than I am going to stop using Oxford commas but it's good to know they exists.
 
I had never seen anyone use the punctuation the way you do and it inspired me to do some Googling. Lo and behold, it turns out that there ARE some cases when you are supposed to precede the word "but" with a comma (if you are connecting two independent clauses). I did not know that.

So this is correct because it connects two independent clauses.

But these are not two independent clauses so this is incorrect.


I had no idea that rule existed. Is it not enforced or have I just not been noticing? I can not recall ever seeing it before.

And what's even more fucked up is that there ARE some very rare occasions when using a comma before "because" is correct. Well fuck me running. Mind blown.
This is not such an occasion.

Nor is this

But there ARE some occasions where it would be proper.

Huh... Well, I guess you learn something new every day. I'm not going to start using either of those rules any more than I am going to stop using Oxford commas but it's good to know they exists.
Pointing out spelling and grammar mistakes is also a sign that you have literally nothing, for the record.
 
When you say things like that, it affects my self-esteem.
Given that you're over here in the peanut gallery lording your pretty underwhelming superiority over a bunch of internet randos and you're running interference for a "man" you only cling to because, by your own admittance, there isn't a better option, I don't think your self-esteem has a lower place to sink to. I'm just telling it like it is.
 
In what way would it be more profitable for Nick to keep his fans poor? How does that work? How is it to Nick's advantage for his fans to have less money?

Holy shit, you people are fucking dumb.
What makes you think his incel army is the one paying? All Nick needs is his crew of spergs to flip out on cue, and make it look like Nick is larping as a politician. Nick really just needs a few brain dead crypto bros and feds making those large charitable deposits.

Nick himself said that Jaden got 100 grand for doing nothing by a generous donor. If worthless, do nothing, basement dwelling Jaden got a 100 grand what do you think the big guy gets? You think your $5 superchats mean anything to him? You're his fast food bitch and nothing more

The truth is you disgust Nick. You're worthless to him because you can't pay to play. All you're good for is going online to fling yourself out as a troll shield. Nick hates you the same way you hate niggers.

When the day comes to sell all of you out, Nick will do it laughing.

Honestly, you retards should have had fathers teach you this shit so that you're not so easily manipulated. Then again if you guys had positive male role models in your life you wouldn't by in AF.
 
What makes you think his incel army is the one paying? All Nick needs is his crew of spergs to flip out on cue, and make it look like Nick is larping as a politician. Nick really just needs a few brain dead crypto bros and feds making those large charitable deposits.

Nick himself said that Jaden got 100 grand for doing nothing by a generous donor. If worthless, do nothing, basement dwelling Jaden got a 100 grand what do you think the big guy gets? You think your $5 superchats mean anything to him? You're his fast food bitch and nothing more

The truth is you disgust Nick. You're worthless to him because you can't pay to play. All you're good for is going online to fling yourself out as a troll shield. Nick hates you the same way you hate niggers.

When the day comes to sell all of you out, Nick will do it laughing.

Honestly, you retards should have had fathers teach you this shit so that you're not so easily manipulated. Then again if you guys had positive male role models in your life you wouldn't by in AF.

That's why they run around online looking for daddies. They didn't have dads IRL.

They are white niggers. LOL

Given that you're over here in the peanut gallery lording your pretty underwhelming superiority over a bunch of internet randos and you're running interference for a "man" you only cling to because, by your own admittance, there isn't a better option, I don't think your self-esteem has a lower place to sink to. I'm just telling it like it is.

 
I like how this stupid frenchie mutt seems to never interact with the fact that his dear leader was caught watching femboy on tranny porn. You can't ignore the fact that your Nickerdoodle is a degenerate that can't function and is so bad at leading that he's tanking his "political group".
lol! Still?
Y'all are like wignats still defending the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
 
Hey, kids! Did you miss me? The question was rhetorical. Of course you did.

Anyway, let's get into it.


Well, at least one person here thinks I'm white.


The definition of a grifter is someone who professes beliefs insincerely in order to maximize profits. There ae some things Nick does that run counter to profit maximization.
For example, I don't think Nick promotes the incel thing because he thinks that will make him money. In fact, it probably costs him some support. There are a lot people who say "I like Nick. He's smart and has good ideas but I just can't get on board with the whole woman-hating thing". If Nick were a totally cynical Machiavel, he would drop it. But Nick doesn't care if it loses him support. He promotes it as a matter of principle.
You could say the same about Nick's unwavering loyalty to Beardson, Baked Alaska, and Ethan Ralph. That probably costs him some support. It would be easier for Nick to ditch those guys just to take that talking point away from his enemies but he doesn't as a matter of principle.



AOC said that the US should cut funding to Israel. What are the groypers supposed to do? Say "That's bad because AOC said it"? How would be that be consistent?

IMO, there is a lot to like about the Bernie Left. They are woke on the Deep State and are reliably anti-war. Some are even semi-redpilled on Jews. They are correct in identifying a lot of the problem with society. Where they go wrong is their proposed solutions to those problems.


Don't care.


You wish.
Your mum is rhetorical.

lol! Still?
Y'all are like wignats still defending the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Wait so are we wignats or rabid leftist liberals trying to destroy America First, and have a direct line of contact to The Open Society Foundation and RWW?
 
lol! Still?
Y'all are like wignats still defending the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
I still haven't seen any groyper/AF adjacent explain how the fuck AF is any different from wignats at this point. Nick really took notes from Stalin with the whole blaming some random guy for all the wrongs in the country and naming his supporters as the biggest enemies of the state even when they were best pals few months ago. Too bad Nick skipped the part where Stalin said that degenerates deserve the gulag too.
 
lol! Still?
Y'all are like wignats still defending the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Unpopular opinion: I actually believe the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are true tho.
 
lol! Still?
Y'all are like wignats still defending the Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
Seriously, what is so virtuous about this man that he commands this level of loyalty from you?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Ishtar
Wait so are we wignats or rabid leftist liberals trying to destroy America First, and have a direct line of contact to The Open Society Foundation and RWW?
The funny thing about the anti-America First crowd is that it is actually a coalition of both. It is a coalition of homosexuals, trannies, antifascists, nihilists, and liberals from the Left united with neo-Nazis, libertarians and Con Inc neoconservatives from the Right.
People sometimes talk about a "red-brown alliance". Nick haters are the red-brown alliance.

I still haven't seen any groyper/AF adjacent explain how the fuck AF is any different from wignats at this point.
Why don't you ask a wignat to explain? There are plenty of TRS fans on KiwiFarms. Try asking them if America First is the same as TRS.

Unpopular opinion: I actually believe the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion are true tho.
Hope springs eternal.

Seriously, what is so virtuous about this man that he commands this level of loyalty from you?
He gets results. Virtue is nice but at this point, I am supremely unimpressed with good intentions. I want results.
 
Back