- Joined
- Jan 29, 2023
Title.
Hard mode: No AGP, since trannies would be a given here
Hard mode: No AGP, since trannies would be a given here
who are the most annoying fetishists?
- Thread starter DoNotFeedTheSneed
- Start date
Solution
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2022
I mean, if you've been on r34, it's the same thing. Just more furry.
I'm sorry for ruining your innocence <3
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2023
Yeah, but I never saw a furry that somehow managed to get two other furries stuck inside his balls and masturbating, basically vore but with testicles, in R34.
Eh, don't feel sorry. There wasn't much of it left anyways.
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2019
Aside from the obvious ones like pedos, incest and bestiality?
Gotta be people into loli. You’re just a pedophile in denial, her being a 5000 year old goddess who looks 10 doesn’t cut it. Weebs are the loudest and most insufferable about this shit so they get my vote. Feet are gross, and I see that one mentioned a lot, but I don’t see footfags blasting.their weirdness on every forum like loli lovers do
Gotta be people into loli. You’re just a pedophile in denial, her being a 5000 year old goddess who looks 10 doesn’t cut it. Weebs are the loudest and most insufferable about this shit so they get my vote. Feet are gross, and I see that one mentioned a lot, but I don’t see footfags blasting.their weirdness on every forum like loli lovers do
- Joined
- May 24, 2018
People who are into anal sex is my final answer. It's become normalized to an extant, so if you (especially if you're a woman) don't want to do it or aren't interested in it creepy perverts or pickmes will pop out of their caves and tell you how great it is and how you're missing out. Also, there are way too many articles getting put out every year encouraging people to do it. Fuck off, poopdicks.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2020
Furries. Furries ruin cute things. If I had a button that would immediately wipe all furries from existence, I would press it twice.
Second place is Feet Weirdos. They are just fucking weird and usually creepy people.
I am not including poaeoaedos in this list because it is not a fetish, it is an evil sickness for which the only cure is .357 milligrams of Death.
Second place is Feet Weirdos. They are just fucking weird and usually creepy people.
I am not including poaeoaedos in this list because it is not a fetish, it is an evil sickness for which the only cure is .357 milligrams of Death.
- Joined
- Mar 27, 2019
Off the top of my head?
Being a furry multiplies the "awful" of every other paraphilia you have. Along with the fact that being a furry doesn't inherently entail engaging in illegal behaviors if acted upon (unlike pedophilia), I think it would constitute as having the most annoying fetishists.
That people can tolerate the concept of cuckoldry/NTR-- much less "like" it-- is harrowing, but what makes those kinds particularly annoying is that I'm sure that nearly all of them self-insert into the position of the bull, even though they would be the cuckold every single time. Side note: I've pondered it, and it doesn't even matter if the "bull" is a woman-- it's always a man that ends up emasculated and made pathetic. If he isn't losing his lover to a more sexually aggressive man, and he's not flouting his obligations to his lover and rubbing it in her face by having sex with another woman right in front of her, he's failing to uphold his obligations to his lover because he couldn't resist a woman.
Being a furry multiplies the "awful" of every other paraphilia you have. Along with the fact that being a furry doesn't inherently entail engaging in illegal behaviors if acted upon (unlike pedophilia), I think it would constitute as having the most annoying fetishists.
That people can tolerate the concept of cuckoldry/NTR-- much less "like" it-- is harrowing, but what makes those kinds particularly annoying is that I'm sure that nearly all of them self-insert into the position of the bull, even though they would be the cuckold every single time. Side note: I've pondered it, and it doesn't even matter if the "bull" is a woman-- it's always a man that ends up emasculated and made pathetic. If he isn't losing his lover to a more sexually aggressive man, and he's not flouting his obligations to his lover and rubbing it in her face by having sex with another woman right in front of her, he's failing to uphold his obligations to his lover because he couldn't resist a woman.
Tomboy fetishism is weird, because its wires are crossed. What I mean is, unlike most fetishes that can be abstracted pretty cleanly, tomboyishness is/was a common-ish and useful phase young girls go through in order to work out their being a woman, first and foremost. The "tomboy genocide" is roughly a real phenomenon in the wake of the transgender zeitgeist and the explosion of self-avowed FtM cases, but the same people that croak "need... tomboy gf" through their dessicated throats lament said "tomboy genocide"... which involves pre-pubescent and pubescent children
But. But. I can rationalize this pretty easily as "hail tomboyish women, allow growing girls to be tomboys in peace if they're so inclined". Nothing wrong with this... in essence.
The crux of my gripe with most tomboy fetishism I've seen in the past few years is that-- because a lot of it is informed by Japanese pop culture and especially pornography-- the specific lust is wrapped up in a very superficial, hackneyed, and pragmatically symbolic aesthetic ("abs! tanned skin! tanlines! abs! short hair!") combined with a very generic personality expectation: "man with vagina and breasts that will act a little bit girly just for you". A lot of tomboy fetishism isn't about attraction to virago as much as it is about not being able to come to terms with the reality that men and women are different in the way they think and in what they value (especially from the other), and being unable/unwilling to manage that reality effectively... while salivating over signifiers. Meanwhile, tomboys are still women and are-- at best-- somewhat more aligned with men in terms of perspective and the way they're inclined to socialize, compared to the average woman.
The reason I mention these guys last is because I can't entirely blame them, since they're most likely to be the kind of people who really did believe as a given that men and women are effectively equal in every regard, only to be inevitably disabused of that notion far too late and in the most staggering way-- to say nothing about the absolute state of Generation Z.
But. But. I can rationalize this pretty easily as "hail tomboyish women, allow growing girls to be tomboys in peace if they're so inclined". Nothing wrong with this... in essence.
The crux of my gripe with most tomboy fetishism I've seen in the past few years is that-- because a lot of it is informed by Japanese pop culture and especially pornography-- the specific lust is wrapped up in a very superficial, hackneyed, and pragmatically symbolic aesthetic ("abs! tanned skin! tanlines! abs! short hair!") combined with a very generic personality expectation: "man with vagina and breasts that will act a little bit girly just for you". A lot of tomboy fetishism isn't about attraction to virago as much as it is about not being able to come to terms with the reality that men and women are different in the way they think and in what they value (especially from the other), and being unable/unwilling to manage that reality effectively... while salivating over signifiers. Meanwhile, tomboys are still women and are-- at best-- somewhat more aligned with men in terms of perspective and the way they're inclined to socialize, compared to the average woman.
The reason I mention these guys last is because I can't entirely blame them, since they're most likely to be the kind of people who really did believe as a given that men and women are effectively equal in every regard, only to be inevitably disabused of that notion far too late and in the most staggering way-- to say nothing about the absolute state of Generation Z.
It's not just the pick-me's-- it's any woman who listens to their female friends coping and doesn't have the brainpower to think about the last time they took a difficult dump.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2023
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
i think you're overthinking this
i believe tomboy 'fetishism' (if you can even call it that) is simply the result of boys liking girls but feeling repulsed and alienated by the modern pop culture 'girl' archetype (hypersexualized, commodified, shallow, superficial, arrogant, vain)
the 'tomboy' fantasy is basically just the result of guys daydreaming about a more natural and human kind of girl than what current year culture is creating
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2022
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2016
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2022
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2022
Being a fudge packer is a fetish, animal fucker.
Assuming you're a man, when did you develop a fetish for women?
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2022
I'm sorry you were molested as a boy, but that doesn't make your repulsive fetish any less abnormal.
I was never molested, nor have I been sexually abused in any way at any point in my life.
I'm sorry you're a closed minded retard with beliefs that were discredited decades ago by the medical community.
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2023
- Joined
- May 26, 2020
Human pups have to be one of the most annoying fetishes as they parade in public wearing their kink gear, and claim to be part of the Furry fandom which many furries disagree with.
Guess some people can't differentiate between sexuality and fetishism, Transgenderism is most likely a fetish and not a sexuality and I have no idea why it's grouped with LGBT.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2022
Islam is right about faggots.
It's grouped because they're all disgusting fetishes by mentally ill weirdos who were diddled as kids. Figures another animal fucker would be the one to claim it's not a nasty fetish lol.
What's my gay?
Seriously. I'm always a little shocked how open they are about wearing their gear out around other people.
You're welcome to convert to Islam. Their 12th century beliefs sound right up your alley.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2022