Who has the authority to decide what makes a social construct?

FiveStarAce

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 11, 2023
We all know the Phrase "X, Y, Z, is a social construct" and while there is some truth to it (in the sense that humans think selectively), it also implies that a collective agreements shapes our realities. Then, if 1000 people say "X is true" and 1000 people disagree, wouldn't that mean that there are just two euqally valid social constructs colliding?

I personally know that phrases like this are simple mental Tricks to recontextualize inconvenient truths out of existenten, but it baffles me that this line of thinking has become so prevalent when its the most impractical way to deal with reality.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: supremeautismo
Social construct is bunch of philosophical bullshit. The authority forcing our obedience is the government, and fear of punishment.
 
THE SOCIETY
1730206047947.png
 
A social construct is anything decided between two or more individuals. Two men agree the third man is lame and gay for waking up late? Social construct. But if two men agree the third man is lame and gay because he only pisses while sitting? Fact. Indisputable fact.
 
The government is just a large, well organized gang. It's no different than a guy with a gun in the alley, and they deserve the same amount of respect. They don't have any unique moral authority, they just use the threat of violence to get their way.
 
Well I mean social constructs are defined by society/nature, as much as everyone loves science, The Science™ won't be able to pull bullshit out of their ass forever.
 
Depending on how far in history and ideological lineages you want to go, Hegelian related philosophies, or the disciples of the Corpus Hermeticum deem everything we percieve as a social/demiurgic construct, however this must be introduced into society a little a time, until our "simulacrum" (false reality) is pealed back and we become one with the true god/universe.
I don't believe in any of this nonsense, but this is what they believe. The modern incarnation of those philosophies are well... modern leftists and communists ( Hegelianism minus mysticism).
 
The social contrat is decided by who has the bigger gun. Philosophy is just justifications for the good ol' use of force.
 
Showering is a social construct by that measure, but it should still be illegal not to do it.
Animals keep themselves clean, often with water. Maybe a statement like "you have to shower every day with soap" is a social construct, but cleaning yourself isn't really.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: supremeautismo
There is no "authority" deciding what is and isn't a social construct any more than there's an authority deciding what is and isn't a chair. Social constructs are defined as that which exists solely as a manifestation of our collective agreement on the matter.
Morality is a social construct. You can't see or touch or taste it. But it exists because our society has a shared sense that some things are "right" or "wrong" without regard to any tangible benefit to the individual.
When people say "gender is a social construct," they're typically stating it as a definition. "Gender" is the set of social norms we associate with, say, masculinity or femininity (these ideas themselves being social constructs) and they're using this definition to distinguish between it and biological sex which is a physical and tangible thing.

There is also the "social constructivist" position that states everything is a social construct on the grounds that the exact defining lines between any one object and another can be made arbitrary with sufficient pedantry but this isn't a common stance among those using this terminology.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: supremeautismo
Back