Who is the most evil?

You say Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, and the rest being evil because they caused suffering and changed the state of the world for the worse. However, we're looking back with less than a hundred years of hindsight. Could the "evil" they made simply be growing pains, as it were? Yes, we're slaughtering the Jews/Niggers/Chinks/Wetbacks/Crackers/etc., but in the long run it'll make the world a better place and raise the quality of life for all who remain. That future benefit would certainly be worth all the death and destruction.
Then again, we can't see the future. Sure, nuking Africa might be the way to go in the short run, but what'll happen a hundred years from now? Two hundred? We might have a superior prosperous future, or we might have started a chain reaction that'll turn the world into a Mad Max-esque wasteland.
Just my two cents, anyway.
 
Genghis Kahn, Vlad the Impaler or Soros. I don't know it's not something you can really qualify that readily. Some people are bad, some people are really bad. Hard to pick one
Temujin was gud boi who was oppressed by the Tartars and other Mongols. Do you hate him for escaping slavery because he didn't deserve his freedom?
 
What is that which deceives nations and poisons the hearts of humans to do evil?
 
So far I believe Europeans as a group are in first place. As far as death, slavery, destruction.

I'm not saying they changed the world for the worst, but that they left the most destructive path.

The people that disagree with me on this comment apparently don't know their history.

The Europeans invaded every single continent and they brought death and destruction along with slavery.

They killed untold millions. The Atlantic slave trade was by majority the British and the French. You conquered not only North America, but South America, Central America and you brought slavery there. What the french did the to Haitians is horrible. What you did to the Africans is much more so.

You conquered the middle east and set their borders. You conquered India and China along with the pacific.

Goddamn open a history book...Seriously.

You even did it to yourselves.
 
The people that disagree with me on this comment apparently don't know their history.

The Europeans invaded every single continent and they brought death and destruction along with slavery.

They killed untold millions. The Atlantic slave trade was by majority the British and the French. You conquered not only North America, but South America, Central America and you brought slavery there. What the french did the to Haitians is horrible. What you did to the Africans is much more so.

You conquered the middle east and set their borders. You conquered India and China along with the pacific.

Goddamn open a history book...Seriously.
They (non-whites) did the atrocities to themselves. We just gave them the tools to do it.
 
815009
 
that Nazi woman from the concentration camp who made lamps out of dead childrens skin

i dont think it matters how many people you killed or why you did it but to revel in the murder of innocents like that is fucking horrifying
That didn't actually happen. It's a story that was pushed by American pulp magazines between the 50s-70s and became part of pop-culture but is itself completely baseless.
 
you are either trolling or suffering from severe marxist indoctrination tbh
war and conquest have been a universal constant across all human civilisations throughout all of history, across all continents. people who single out europe as uniquely evil for these things are either severely misinformed, or are butthurt nonwhites who are still mad about the fact that europeans came out on top.

That is bullshit. You were seeking resources and in a race with other European nations to conquer those resources.

Why did you need to go to Africa and conquer them (setting aside the Barbary wars), or even to the Americas.

Europe was the catalyst to all these things ( and I mean who did the most damage which is the topic of this thread). Acting like they weren't is foolish.
 
The people that disagree with me on this comment apparently don't know their history.

The Europeans invaded every single continent and they brought death and destruction along with slavery.

They killed untold millions. The Atlantic slave trade was by majority the British and the French. You conquered not only North America, but South America, Central America and you brought slavery there. What the french did the to Haitians is horrible. What you did to the Africans is much more so.

You conquered the middle east and set their borders. You conquered India and China along with the pacific.

Goddamn open a history book...Seriously.

You even did it to yourselves.

Any other race/nationality would do the exact same thing if they hadn't gotten the short end of the evolutionary/technological stick. Europeans were forced by local conditions (climate, population densities, etc) to adapt and invent technology to survive and prosper. If Africans weren't technologically backwards, you think we wouldn't all be slaves to some Zulu colonizers? Come on, they'd kill everyone they could and rape all the women in a heartbeat, just like the white folks did when they arrived, or the Mongols did to everyone they came across, etc.
 
@Null is the most evil, he headhunts trannies that never wronged him, and turns innocent autists into trannies to kill them later, he even hurt the feelings of the entire New Zealand all while calling himself and his goons kiwis.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Balaam
Any other race/nationality would do the exact same thing if they hadn't gotten the short end of the evolutionary/technological stick. Europeans were forced by local conditions (climate, population densities, etc) to adapt and invent technology to survive and prosper. If Africans weren't technologically backwards, you think we wouldn't all be slaves to some Zulu colonizers? Come on, they'd kill everyone they could and rape all the women in a heartbeat, just like the white folks did when they arrived, or the Mongols did to everyone they came across, etc.


The point of the thread as asked by the OP is who did the most damage. Do you actually disagree that Europeans did the most damage?

Because history says they did. They also did a lot of good as I mentioned in a previous post.

But I'd like people to think about where Euro nations didn't invade in the whole world as it is.

Sometimes they got their ass kicked, but mostly they oppressed the native population and took their resources, but they also in instances built society that survives today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1842_retreat_from_Kabul



Again why were you in isandlwana, south africa.....why were you in kabul...why were you in egypt, why were you in the Americas?
 
Last edited:
The people that disagree with me on this comment apparently don't know their history.

The Europeans invaded every single continent and they brought death and destruction along with slavery.

They killed untold millions. The Atlantic slave trade was by majority the British and the French. You conquered not only North America, but South America, Central America and you brought slavery there. What the french did the to Haitians is horrible. What you did to the Africans is much more so.

You conquered the middle east and set their borders. You conquered India and China along with the pacific.

Goddamn open a history book...Seriously.

You even did it to yourselves.

What is Islam

What is Africa

What is China

What is Communism
 
paedophiles.
I cant think of anything worse than robbing a child of their innocence.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Chichan
Flash is the most evil person ever


Nah, but in all seriousness I'm not sure. It's easy to say Stalin but I personally would rather go with someone that did the wicked deeds themselves instead of ordering other people to do it for them, so I would rather go with say someone like a Mengele, the Japanese doctors in that one site that conducted human experiments, or certain serial murderers. In other words, the people that actually enjoy being evil by doing it.

@Unog the real question is what is love?
 
The point of the thread as asked by the OP is who did the most damage. Do you actually disagree that Europeans did the most damage?

Because history says they did. They also did a lot of good as I mentioned in a previous post.

But I'd like people to think about where Euro nations didn't invade in the whole world as it is.

Sometimes they got their ass kicked, but mostly they oppressed the native population and took their resources, but they also in instances built society that survives today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1842_retreat_from_Kabul


I dunno, whites didn't really introduce slavery to any but the most isolated peoples, it's a pretty universal concept. The Africans did it, the American Indians did it. Latin Americans really did it. The worst thing about white exploration was spreading smallpox. That's destructive, sure, but it's hardly evil.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Piss Clam
Back