RU Who was Yakov Yurovsky, the man behind the murder of Nicholas II?

L | A
By Oleg Yegorov
8af2aad42939183612b47f833515752014cdf46c.jpg
Yakov Yurovsky surely loved tea - In one of few photos we have he is portrayed with a large glass

This devoted Bolshevik commanded executioners to unleash the fury of their guns on the Romanovs, and even after many years passed Yurovsky never regretted what he did.

As you may know, Russia’s last emperor, Nicholas II, was executed on July 17, 1918, when the Bolshevik guards opened fire on him and his entire family: wife, four daughters and a son, as well as five servants.

This grisly event happened in the cellar of the so-called “House of Special Purpose” in Yekaterinburg (a major city in the Urals, 1,700 km east of Moscow), where the former imperial family was held since April 1918.

7a5efb55b535717bd1fbefc6ff25df17f5e73aeb.jpg
The Ipatiev House, where Nicholas II was executed along with his family

The Bolsheviks, led by Yakov Yurovsky, a rigid black-bearded man who worked in the local Cheka (secret police), acted in cold blood, finishing off those who didn’t die right away with knives and bayonets. That’s what Yurovsky himself wrote in a note, calling himself in third person, “commander,” which indeed was his post in the “House of Special Purpose”:

“The commander told the Romanovs that, as their relatives in Europe keep on attacking Soviet Russia, the Bolshevik government in the Urals gave a verdict to shoot them. Nicholas turned to the family, then turned back to the commander, asking: ‘What? What?’ The commander repeated… then the firing started, which lasted for two or three minutes. It was the commander who killed Nicholas instantly.”

The last sentence, however, might be incorrect, and to this day it is still disputed who exactly among the firing squad shot and killed the ex-emperor. Yurovsky’s testimony, however, shows his ruthlessness and brutality. What turned him into an executioner?


From a watchmaker to a Bolshevik

ba113a6a78fa6bd95168d77452e295c89dfbb2ce.jpg
Actual Yakov Yurovsky vs. portrayed by Duncan Pow

In The Last Czars, a 2019 show by Netflix, Yurovsky, portrayed by Duncan Pow, plays a crucial role as an antagonist to Nicholas II. The emperor was (according to the show) a kind but weak man who didn’t want to reign in the first place. Yurovsky, on the contrary, was shown as a devoted person who would do anything for the cause he believed in – making ordinary people’s lives better.

One of the scenes shows Yurovsky speaking to Nicholas days before his execution. The two men are sharing a cigarette and Yurovsky recalls how they met each other once before. “1891, I was 10. You were completing your Far East tour. You stopped in Tomsk… I had a little flag, waving it. Just one of the little ants you were nodding and waving at.”

0c53a661bf90104b8c22ff8e19f6636453b819b2.jpg

In reality, Yurovsky wouldn’t have bothered to speak with Nicholas II unless it was necessary, let alone share childhood memories. Born into a poor Jewish family in 1878 near Tomsk (3,600 km east of Moscow) – so he certainly wasn’t 10 in 1891 – Yurovsky was eighth among 10 siblings, He often changed his place of residence and occupation early in life, frequently wandering around Russia as a watchmaker’s apprentice.

In 1905, Yurovsky became acquainted with revolutionaries. Knowing quite well the hardships that Russians faced on a daily basis, he turned into an ardent anti-monarchist, spending several years in exile. Then, 12 years later he welcomed the October Revolution of 1917, which gave power to his comrades – the Bolsheviks.


New appointment

b68f90e4374c46cbda862fee8e8b5d7f6f008a18.jpg
Nicholas II after his abdication

While Vladimir Lenin, Leon Trotsky, and other prominent communist leaders were ruling Soviet Russia from Moscow, Yurovsky was among those working in the Russian hinterland, namely in Yekaterinburg, an important citadel and industrial city in the Urals with a powerful workers’ movement. Loyal to the Communist Party, Yurovsky dutifully performed everything his bosses told him to do.

When he was appointed the commander of the “House of Special Purpose” it meant the Bolsheviks wanted to harden conditions for their royal prisoners.

“They put a steel bar on the only window we had,” ex-empress Alexandra wrote in her diary soon after meeting Yurovsky. “Obviously, they are constantly afraid of us escaping.” On the other hand, Yurovsky, a man of principle, stopped the guards from stealing food from the prisoners, which happened often under his predecessor.


Sloppy execution

176ec8d31b95d5f0f208b818574a2a46c6d74007.jpg
Reconstruction of the massacre of Nicholas II. Frontpage of French newspaper Le Petit Journal Illustre, July 25, 1926

Yurovsky had no sympathy towards his prisoners. Later, in his memoirs, he would write: “My general impression was the following: an ordinary, I would say a bourgeois family… Nicholas himself looked like a petty low-ranking officer… No one would say that the man used to be Czar of such an enormous country for many years.”

Throughout his life, he never showed any signs of guilt for executing the royal family, including the children. His report is laconic: “On July 16, 6 p.m. Filipp Goloshchyokin [Yurovsky’s boss] ordered to execute the prisoners.” By 1 a.m. the next day the Romanovs and their servants were dead.

3451e025bc085dd474c47a7dc7135f98ddfed644.jpg
The cellar where the royal family was shot, after the execution

Yurovsky and his men, however, failed completely in terms of disposal of the bodies – their first plan was to throw the bodies in a deep mine outside the city but it turned out not deep enough, so they had to move the bodies to another site. The weather conditions were severe, and cars couldn’t reach the place “Nothing was prepared, no shovels, nothing…” Yurovsky wrote later.

In the end, they partly burned the bodies and buried them in a shallow grave.


Later life


There was a reason why the Bolsheviks executed the Romanovs in July 1918 - at that time the anti-Bolshevik White Army was close to Yekaterinburg, and there were concerns that the imperial family would be freed and taken out of the country. Soon after plotting the infamous execution, Yakov Yurovsky, along with many other Bolsheviks, had to flee the city.

However, he returned later when the Bolsheviks finally defeated the Whites in 1922. Later, in Moscow and in Yekaterinburg, he worked at many posts - none connected with executions. Yurovsky died in 1938 of a peptic ulcer.
 
It was just Lenin and Stalin and Trotsky and the rest didn't count on normal Russians (and East Germans and Poles and Slovaks, and the rest) seeing blue jeans and pizza and rock music as something they wanted in on.
You give them much credit as these puppet masters. I don't think anyone who reads extensive stories of these people can get away with anything but an image of opportunists, they weren't planning for longer than a couple months ahead at their best. The German command had to personally wheel Lenin and Trotsky into Russia because they missed the revolution they were so busy masterminding.
 
Lol, of course Netflix is trying to humanize a bloodthirsty communist who gleefully ordered the death of not only Nicholas II, but his children too.
They happily broadcast propaganda demonizing real patriots like Stalin. Hmmm, so what's different between this one and Stalin? Are they anti-Georgian racists?
 
The sisters all gathered in around their baby brother and were found covering his body.

Whatever you think of royalty, killing children- children raised to be decent enough that their last act was to try to protect the youngest sibling- tells you a lot about a movement.

The successor of the Bolsheviks is the LGBT groomer gangs.
I still don't get why the children had to die. Why couldn't they exile them out of state. Was the Bolsheveks scared they would rise to power and order THEM killed?
 
I still don't get why the children had to die. Why couldn't they exile them out of state. Was the Bolsheveks scared they would rise to power and order THEM killed?
There are any number or pretenders to the throne (not pretending like troons do when they put on a dress and feel like a real woman, but having a claim on a throne in pretense) in pretty much ever place with a ruling family, so kill them off and they can't be used as a rallying point for those opposed to the new order. A cousin of a cousin who is very rich and says he's the rightful heir is not nearly as much of a threat as the literal son of a murdered king who is cooling his heels in London and plotting with his family to build an army and march on Moscow, especially once the Soviets started oppressing the Russians and Georgians and Ukes and everyone else. Putting a few rounds into the bodies of royal kids solves that problem nicely.
 
Fixed it. Let's call things by their proper name.

Any other questions?

Reading about the Soviet terrors is a good way to hone your Jewdar on exactly which types of Slavic surnames are associated with the descendants of these hellbound, sadistic freaks. There's lots of opportunity for practical application whenever you're reading news stories coming from the first world, the virus jumped hosts after all.
Yep, the Judeo-Bolshevik meme gained traction because it was objectively true, ol' Adolf was not just sperging at shadows. A cursory examination of the Bolshevik leadership of the revolutionary/civil war period will absolutely show you that it's almost all Jews all the way down, and theirs was certainly a revolt by the Synagogue of Satan against Christianity on a spiritual level. Yurovsky, the guy who actually killed the Romanovs? Jew. Sverdlov, the man who signed the Romanovs' death warrants? Jew. Lenin? Jew. Trotsky, AKA Bronstein? 200% Jewish. Zinoviev? Take a wild guess. Yaroslavsky, possibly the greatest 'Russian' fedora-tipper of all time and founder of the world's first club for euphoric atheists? Yeah, he was a fucking Christ-killer too. Etc., etc. Stalin purged most of these cunts, but he didn't come to power until some time after the Revolution and Civil War were already over.

I find it quite funny that one of the arguments touted for the Red side in the civil war is that they were the 'real' defenders of the Russian nation against the Whites, who were backed by outside (Entente) powers with their own asshole demands. But the Reds themselves were led and organized by international-minded Jews who loathed Russia and Russian nationalism (Lenin called it 'Great Russian chauvinism' and supported the non-Russian nations of the USSR precisely to weaken & counterbalance against the Russian nation), and to whom Russia was only useful as a base for further revolutions against God and nation and tradition - all nations, all traditions. (Again, Stalin put a stop to that, but he came later.) Korenizatsiya has a lot in common with affirmative action and modern woke leftard fantasies about 'giving power & self-rule to the oppressed minorities', and the token (actually) Russian Bolshevik Bukharin's defense of his boss shitting on the Russian people literally sounds exactly like some 21st-century soycuck trying to justify why it is in fact 100% right & just that he gives Tyrone all his stuff as gibs in addition to routinely watching him rail his girlfriend in front of him & volunteering to clean up the resulting mess (and naturally, it's the moral duty of all other honkeys to do the same):
At the 12th Congress of the RCP(b) Nikolay Bukharin stated: “We, [ethnic Russians] as a former great-power nation, must put ourselves in an unequal position. Only with such a policy, when we artificially put ourselves in a position lower than others, only at this price can we buy the trust of formerly oppressed nations."[3]
And so on, so forth. Truly there's nothing new under the sun.
 
No shit that Jews hated the royal family with the pogroms they were responsible for. But it is easier to simp for a family than the communities they destroyed.

Not that muh Jews even has a point when it was due to the how the war progressed:
There was a reason why the Bolsheviks executed the Romanovs in July 1918 - at that time the anti-Bolshevik White Army was close to Yekaterinburg, and there were concerns that the imperial family would be freed and taken out of the country. Soon after plotting the infamous execution, Yakov Yurovsky, along with many other Bolsheviks, had to flee the city.
 
Didn't he have Jewish ancestry on his mother's side?
He was a mutt, had trace Jewish Blood but had Russian and a gazillion other things. His family tried to raise him in a Christian setting IIRC and apparently Lenin was unaware of his Jewish heritage.

If he did identify as Jewish, he was yet another self hating Jew:

Treat the Jews (express it politely: Jewish petty bourgeoisie) and urban inhabitants in the Ukraine with an iron rod, transferring them to the front, not letting them into the government agencies (except in an insignificant percentage, in particularly exceptional circumstances, under class control).
 
Yeah gee I wonder who "Yakov" could have been.
No shit that Jews hated the royal family with the pogroms they were responsible for. But it is easier to simp for a family than the communities they destroyed.

Not that muh Jews even has a point when it was due to the how the war progressed:
Like clockwork, the resident Jew defender is here to ballwash and run defense for the Jew-led massacre of the Romanovs.
 
Like clockwork, the resident Jew defender is here to ballwash and run defense for the Jew-led massacre of the Romanovs.
I should really make it more of a habit to post articles like these on Saturdays. Then actual discussions can be held without derailment.
 
Yeah gee I wonder who "Yakov" could have been.

Like clockwork, the resident Jew defender is here to ballwash and run defense for the Jew-led massacre of the Romanovs.
I didn't even talk of whether killing the children was justified. I find it the same type of pointless morality talk as the bombing of Hiroshima.
I should really make it more of a habit to post articles like these on Saturdays. Then actual discussions can be held without derailment.
I guess "derailment" is actually discussing on something instead of being the billionth person on A&N saying Jews Bad as if it's a controversial statement even outside KF.
 
Back