Law Why Anakin Skywalker should’ve been removed from the Jedi Order for sexual harassment

USA Today:
In anticipation of the Star Wars: The Last Jedi movie release, like many others, I’ve been rewatching the series. To my horror, while viewing Star Wars: Episode II — Attack of the Clones, I realized that Anakin Skywalker (even before overtly becoming evil) was a sexual predator in the workplace!

Skywalker's role in the destruction of the Jedi Order and the establishment of the Galactic Empire is the impetus for the ensuing movies in the franchise. There would be no bad guys in a majority of the films if the Jedi Order had removed a workplace predator from their ranks.

While this may have happened a long time ago in a galaxy far far away, it deserves to be called out now. By allowing a predator in the workplace, and not doing enough to fight sexual harassment, the Jedi Council ultimately engineers its own demise.

Members of the Jedi Council should’ve removed Skywalker from the Jedi Order after his many missteps while protecting Sen. Padmé Amidala. If they had, Chancellor Palpatine would have been unable to leverage Skywalker into destroying the Jedi Order, dismantling democracy and creating the first Galactic Empire.

Strike 1
Skywalker, who is officially assigned to protect Amidala from an assassination plot, begins crossing professional and personal boundaries as soon as he’s alone with her. While Amidala is packing her bags for a long trip with her state-appointed protector, Skywalker starts making inappropriate advances. She flat out tells him, "Don't look at me like that," because "it makes me feel uncomfortable." He simultaneously offers a facetious apology and undermines her own position of authority over him.

Skywalker has already overstepped his boundaries in a professional setting. She calls him out on it, and it should be the end of the story. But he insists on harassing Amidala for the duration of the film, making her feel, at turns, uncomfortable and unsafe.

Strike 2
Even during meals, Skywalker is relentless in his pursuit of Amidala. She attempts to make light conversation about Skywalker's Jedi vows, but he uses this polite discussion as an opportunity to pounce, declaring that he can’t be “with the people I love.” He immediately follows this up by confessing to her that he remembers her in his dreams. Skywalker is telling an elected official, who is obligated to be in his presence, that he has been dreaming about her.

It’s an unhealthy obsession — not anything close to love. And where can Amidala go? Her life is in danger, and she has no choice but to stay with Skywalker, who is at turns her protector and her predator. On top of all of this, Skywalker has supernatural powers — he’s one of the strongest beings in the entire galaxy. Talk about a power dynamic!

Strike 3
Skywalker, who is still a Padawan learner and not yet a Jedi knight, isn’t content with threatening Amidala's sexual agency, but insists on undermining her professional authority as well. On her home planet of Naboo she discusses with the queen where she would like to stay while in hiding. Skywalker takes this moment, in front of an assortment of nobility and elected officials, to throw a tantrum and assert his dominance by telling her that he’s “in charge of security.”

Later, when they’re alone, Skywalker decides to confront her with his feelings. He tells her that since they met (when he was a child), “a day hasn’t gone by when I haven’t thought of you.”

That’s just plain creepy!

Strike 4
Then he places the blame on her — because of course a woman can’t exist professionally without it threatening some self-centered man. He tells her, “You are in my very soul, tormenting me. What can I do?” Um, how about realize this is a you problem and let Amidala live her life?

It’s shocking that the Jedi Council, or at least some of its members, like Masters Yoda and Windu, didn’t know about these flagrant violations of professional and personal boundaries. After all, can’t they use the force?

The Jedi Council's inability to remove a toxic, misogynistic predator from its ranks ultimately brings about its downfall — when Anakin Skywalker joins the dark side and becomes Darth Vader. Maybe if the Jedi were more concerned with gender equality, and less concerned with balancing the force, then they would still be around today.
 
There was an equally autistic article about Star Wars in the National Post yesterday:

Star Wars is colonial fantasy: How our future imaginings are limited by our past

https://archive.is/CN0E3
That is a whole lot of autism to say "science fiction is often unrealistic in some ways to make room for making an allegory in other ways".

I learned that in 5th grade English class, but you do you, National Post.
 
Seems pretty accurate to me. Anakin was always a Nice Guy and incel and damn near and incel even at his best.

This could have been done well, but because George Lucas's autism, he came across as a self-pitying emo pussy instead of a tormented villain.

Even post-evil Darth Vader, a pure villain, was more sympathetic than that pussy, who couldn't carry a whole movie because you just couldn't really manage to be sympathetic with such a weak, whiny asshole.

Also, how is the article in the OP even angry about this? It's just pointing it out.
Yeah, isn't the whole deal with Anakin Skywalker the fact that he is a total failure who never lived up to his potential and thus became Darth Vader?
 
Yeah, isn't the whole deal with Anakin Skywalker the fact that he is a total failure who never lived up to his potential and thus became Darth Vader?

Basically Sheev manipulated Anakin into thinking the Jedi and Sith were moreorless the same, only the dark side would let him save what's her face. Because the Jedi are a bunch of autists who don't know how to deal with people's emotions, he succeeded.

The whole PT is the story about how Sheev became emperor really.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Burgers in the ass
XJHI6-Fkucujs5LfeWpUfbCZquvgv57SoWYWDEk8z9g-1.jpeg
 
There was an equally autistic article about Star Wars in the National Post yesterday:

Star Wars is colonial fantasy: How our future imaginings are limited by our past

>biggest enemy is "the Empire"
>colonial fantasy


Now this guy isn't just autistic, he's a fucking moron. Star Wars is completely anti-imperialist.
 
>biggest enemy is "the Empire"
>colonial fantasy


Now this guy isn't just autistic, he's a fucking moron. Star Wars is completely anti-imperialist.

>The Empire is portrayed as a brutal, oppressive force that rules the galaxy with an iron fist
>The Empire is literally styled after Nazi Germany (with officers wearing uniforms that are very similar to Nazi fashion and the Empire itself being staunchly pro-human/anti-alien, similar to how the Nazis were staunchly pro-Aryan/anti-everyone else)
>The heroes are literally called "the rebels" and "the resistance" and their fight against the Empire spans the entire original trilogy plus Rouge One

I'm not even really a Star Wars fan and even I can tell you this stuff.
 
>biggest enemy is "the Empire"
>colonial fantasy


Now this guy isn't just autistic, he's a fucking moron. Star Wars is completely anti-imperialist.

I wonder considering he's a university proffessor and how softmore this was if he's doing it to take the piss or make a few bucks. I can believe the prof being that spergy but it would genrally be a lot better written and abstract maybe something about the rebels being a white mans burden or the rebel aliens not having any major roles or the trade federation being a fill in for non-whites wanting their basic freedoms. It'd still totally miss the point but it'd be a little harder to rebuke than simply watching the movie.

On second thought maybe not here's the author doing a ted talk

This sort of stuff and the anakin article is so asinine and trivial it doesnt even really offend me anymore, it's so easy to rebuke it just slightly annoys me as a supliferous bullshit. The economy is a house of cards and we have a broad variety of social issues. Why would I give a single shit about some 3rd rate analysis of pop culture overanalysed a really simple film?
 
Last edited:
Padme was a horrible person for just excusing Anakin's mass murder of a village of sand people. Imagine if Amy Klobuchar's boyfriend got mad one day and opened fire inside a mosque and she didn't tell anyone, I can't see this author glossing over that just because she got micro-aggressed by a penis-holder.
The main reason he killed everyone in the camp was beacuse he went back to free his mother from slavery. She died a slave and you'd be pissed if sand people worked your mother to death in a life of slavery. Padme was a ride or die bitch for her reaction to what he did.
 
Back