Culture Why Andy Serkis Turned ‘Animal Farm’ Into a Family Film—and What It Teaches Kids

Link (Archive)

Why Andy Serkis Turned ‘Animal Farm’ Into a Family Film—and What It Teaches Kids​

IMG_7340.jpeg
Yes, Andy Serkis has heard the controversy about his film Animal Farm, out in theaters on May 1, 2026. Why would he create a family-friendly adaptation of George Orwell’s famously dark 1945 book which uses farm animals to critique totalitarianism? For the beloved director, actor, and dad of three, the answer is simple: He wants to get young minds thinking.

“We wanted to aim it at young inquiring minds so that parents could ask them what they thought about things,” says Serkis, who fell in love with the book as a kid and wanted to make this film for about 15 years. “That was one of the objectives of it—placing them in the driving seat.”

It’s what inspired the creation of the character Lucky, a piglet who does not appear in the book, battling between his own morals and tyranny. Serkis envisioned children exploring their own ideas about what's right and wrong through the likable (and adorable) main character, who is perfectly voiced by Strangers Things star Gaten Matarazzo.

“You go on this journey with him being sucked into this more glamorous world of everything that the greed of the pigs brings them,” says the director, who also voices original Manor Farm owner Mr. Jones in the film. “We just thought that'd be good for kids to experience.”

But readers of the book will recognize other characters, including main antagonist Napoleon, brilliantly voiced by Seth Rogen, and the dedicated Boxer, beautifully brought to life by Woody Harrelson, among others. And even if they notice other changes, such as Freida Pilkington, the reimagined farm owner Mr. Pilkington memorably voiced by Glenn Close, the themes are pretty much in line with Orwell’s book.

“We’ve not drifted that far from his intention,” says the Planet of the Apes star. “It’s just making it more applicable to the world that we're living in now, rather than totalitarian Russia of the 1940s…And we worked very closely with the Orwell estate to establish that if we were going to tell the story, they believed that it was the right thing to do to make it a more contemporary version.”

What Kids Can Learn From the 'Animal Farm' Movie​

In the PG-rated film, kids will see how being power-hungry can corrupt a family or a society and how inequality is normalized when the animals in the story aren't treated fairly. They'll hear the famous phrase, "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." And especially through the friendship of Lucky and Boxer, they'll grasp why that phrase is so problematic.

But this film isn't without humor. Kids will get a laugh along the way with fart jokes, a slaughterhouse misunderstanding, and more lighthearted scenes. Don't worry about a bleak conclusion, either. This film offers families a much happier ending, another change from the book.

“As an eternally kind of relevant book, we know that history repeats itself. It goes around in cycles but genuinely, we have to ask ourselves, why is it that we always end up in the same position where nothing really moves forward that much?” explains Serkis. "You have to keep trying."

That's the message he hopes kids will understand through the altered ending.

“We’re not tying it up in a nice, shiny bow and saying that we all live happily ever after—far from it," he says. "We're saying it's up to the next generation to at least try. You have to engage and you have to keep questioning the leadership that stopped listening to you and telling you lies because we're living in a world where nobody knows what truth is anymore.”

Is the ‘Animal Farm’ Film Too Dark for Kids?​

Serkis, who also released an Animal Farmaudiobook, acknowledges that the violence in the book can be graphic and upsetting. He made it a point to tone that down in the film, even when portraying the characters.

“We wanted to keep the sinister nature of Napoleon as a charismatic kind of guy you fall for, rather than being a brutal dictator, even though he's malicious and malign underneath it,” he gives as an example. “He's just manages to do it all with a smile in this version.”

Some scenes may still be inappropriate for much younger kids, such as moments of the pigs drinking “naughty juice,” Boxer getting injured, fight scenes, and Napoleon’s eventual takedown and defeat. But overall, children may walk away feeling they can make change, even in their small friend groups, by leading with kindness and compassion, and be empowered to ask questions about politics and social justice—no matter where their families lean politically.

“I don't mind if people like it or dislike it,” says Serkis, “but as long as there's some discourse and everyone engages in conversation about it, that’s the intention of it.”
 
it's also worth bringing up yet again
THE ORIGINAL WORK WAS ALREADY FOR KIDS THAT'S WHY IT'S A SHORT BOOK WITH SIMPLE WORDS ABOUT TALKING ANIMALS YOU FUCKING MONGOLOIDS
 
It came to my attention that the writer of this abomination, Nicholas Stoller, was the director of Billy Eichner’s Bros, a box office flop about faggots.
IMG_5138.webp

The guy who couldn’t make a hit movie about faggots fucking each other in the ass to mainstream audiences thought it was a good idea to disregard Orwell’s message and themes by turning a socialist totalitarian allegory into a watered-down, comedic story that targets capitalism rather than focusing on the corrupting nature of absolute power.
 
Last edited:
Seth Rogen is a legitimate hack retard who can’t write and act for shit.

I’m not surprised he and Serkis avoided the entire point of the novel.
I'm surprised they didn't add a new character, a Goose with a funny mustache that liked to paint until the Fire Nation attacked the pigs took over but after shenanigans ensued, he (goose-)stepped right up to take charge and was even worse than them.
 
It came to my attention that the writer of this abomination, Nicholas Stoller, was the director of Billy Eichner’s Bros, a box office flop about faggots.
View attachment 8952846
The guy who couldn’t make a hit movie about faggots fucking each other in the ass to mainstream audiences thought it was a good idea to disregard Orwell’s message and themes by turning a socialist totalitarian allegory into a watered-down, comedic story that targets capitalism rather than focusing on the corrupting nature of absolute power.
I don't want to imagine what he's capable to do if he dare to adapt Huxley's Brave New World and/or Bradbury's Fahrenheit-451...one thing is sure however, he wants to outdone Ghostbusters 2016 for the biggest failures.
 
Well, with the opening weekend box office all but set in stone it seems that this masterpiece has taken $3.4m from 2600 theatres ($1308 per theatre) so assuming a typical 50:50 split that'll be $1.7m back to the distributor (Angel Studios) to set against the costs.. Only a NA release so far but it appears releasing to coincide with May Day didn't generate much of a bump. The production budget was a reported $35m with the best guesses including marketing and distribution taking total costs to $60m - $70m.

Bomb doesn't seem a strong enough word to describe this failure. Still looking forward to the weasel word apologies from the shills. And Angel Studios when they finally realise that calling their customer base 'tards for not sucking up the gaslighting ain't a winning strategy.
 
They keep giving these writers, actors and directors so many chances to lose them fucking money that even though Seth Rogen should be completely avoided at this point for being box office poison and a hack, he keeps getting work.
I am legitimately convinced that the mafia runs Hollywood and they are using these failing movies as a money laundering scheme. It's almost like the plot of the producers, they can get away with taking the money as long as it is a failure.
 
Well, with the opening weekend box office all but set in stone it seems that this masterpiece has taken $3.4m from 2600 theatres ($1308 per theatre) so assuming a typical 50:50 split that'll be $1.7m back to the distributor (Angel Studios) to set against the costs.. Only a NA release so far but it appears releasing to coincide with May Day didn't generate much of a bump. The production budget was a reported $35m with the best guesses including marketing and distribution taking total costs to $60m - $70m.

Bomb doesn't seem a strong enough word to describe this failure. Still looking forward to the weasel word apologies from the shills. And Angel Studios when they finally realise that calling their customer base 'tards for not sucking up the gaslighting ain't a winning strategy.
I’m surprised Angel Studios released this movie.
 
I’m surprised Angel Studios released this movie.
Jim Angel hasn't called me to let me know the exacts but as far as I've heard this was in the can and literally couldn't find a distro so Angel lowballed them and got it for pennies on the dollar, so if this clears even only marketing costs they're in the black
 
And raping Roald Dahl's corpse.

View attachment 8957789
Do I need to post pictures of the original Wonka kids reuniting over the years as a palate cleanser because I fucking will. Also...Charlie 'Paley' ??? Is a bucket too woke? Too cruel because lol poors? Or are they gonna make him middle class?
Oh nvm it's a new generation of kids. So what are we gonna see older Veruca? They better not make her a hashtag gatekeep girlboss because she'd be better as a Miranda Priestly type bitch.

Oh god is Violet gonna be a menopausal blueberry now?
 
Back
Top Bottom