Why are Jews so antagonistic and disagreeable?

I've only had 1 (one) jewish friend and he didnt have any red flags at all expect for being a jew obviously but im convinced that was all a act to merely not stand out and thus making his job of infiltrating society easier.
So its nature 1000%
 
I am 100% convinced that there's a correlation between Ashkenazi Jews and dark triad personality disorders, though any data confirming this would not be allowed to exist. Of all the people I have known with narcissistic or BPD mothers, at least half of them have been Jewish, and of all the Jews I've known, 100% have had narcissistic or BPD mothers. It's just the way they are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gangstalker #32194
GSK-ZAKbYAEkoES.jpeg

Where are these "jews" ?
 
I think wanting the security of a victim and the spoils of a victor is common for everyone and not just jews.
I wouldn't say 'security' and 'spoil'.
Protecting the victimised is a fairly new concept in human history, we didn't have literally thousands of years of conquest and slavery because we as a collective whole felt that the weak and powerless needed protection. I'd rather say very much the opposite, the weak existed to be victimised and used by the strong. Genghis Khan never said to himself "well my army is bigger and stronger than yours, guess I can't invade you". Rome was geared towards conquering its neighbours.
And on the topic of Rome, Jews still remember their horrific loss at Masada, still go to the Wailing Wall to remind themselves that they're the eternal victim because they tried to bloody the nose of Rome and got their shit pushed back in.
Arguably it's only been since WW2 that Jews have been able to play the victim card to any meaningful success but they've clearly had a victim mindset long long before then. When one sees themselves as a victim they can justify themselves doing many bad things.

As for spoils I wouldn't say they're looking for spoils of the victor. No gold, diamonds, or fertile lands. Rather a moral hegemony over others that usually shows itself in a deep hypocrisy. For example unfettered immigration good in the west, but bad for them. Although that might be going a bit too dark and conspiratorial. I'm fully willing to just accept that so many Jews individually (and that there is no grand clandestine Jewish cabal) are doing what they think is right (such as creating the porn industry, paying off politicians to implement pro-Israel policies etc.), because they're culturally conditions simply to assume that they know better because they are better because they're Jewish.
 
I didn't know that and assumed they called it different but similar things solely to confuse the goyim.
No, they are completely different things. Torah is just the first five books of the Bible: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy.
The Talmud is Rabbinical lawyering to make the things the Torah clearly says have a different meaning. This is pretty much the crux of why Jews are so schizophrenic: they have the Torah saying one thing but then their Rabbis tell them things from the Talmud that are wildly contradictory.
 
Rome was geared towards conquering its neighbours.
Not really, they took great pains to ensure there was always a justification for their wars and preferred to delegate things to local client rulers first rather than directly annex. The Romans were also completely dependent on the support of their Italian allies up until the Social War.

They were just very good at using this strategy to incrementally gobble up all of the Mediterranean over time, the Republic was 500 years old by the time of Augustus. If anything, I would argue Rome started the practice of protecting weak nations and peoples for their benefit.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mesh Gear Fox
Back