Why are men such slaves to their libidos? - Seriously, I need answers

Other moi-

Oh

There is another aspect of sexual differences in mammals (and in many other vertebrates) that we should discuss: The assymetric distribution of mating success. Whereas the average male will have as many offspring as the average female, the distribution is generally wider in males, and quite a lot of males will have zero mating success and zero offspring. Those are the losers who post in the Woman Hate Thread.
 
tldr because it's funny sometimes.

Also, wouldn't.
1729033323738.png
 
Men are not slaves to their libido. Simply put: men like to annoy women and unwanted sex commentary is the quickest way to accomplish the task.
Y tho? ☹️

Moreover, women coming on to males is not something that is well seen among peers. Males don't give a shit if you try your luck, we don't have such a thing as a "pick me".
Yes they do.

They'd neg. They'd fuss about her not being a 9 or a 10 or her ass being flat having a zit or some other petty shit about appearance. They'd cry about her being a used up roastie. They'd say she just wants your nonexistant money. They'd cry about her being annoying, the list goes on...


Seriously, I think the bigger question is, why is women's libido so low? Maybe it's because it gets beaten down so much.

Do men want women to be attracted to them at all? Clearly not. Hence the guys should suck up their single hood, they're clearly asking for it. It's what they want isn't it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDarknessGrows
Women are just as libido-driven, they're just more coy about it in public.
Seriously, I think the bigger question is, why is women's libido so low? Maybe it's because it gets beaten down so much.
Dunno, all my past gfs were perpetually horny and wanted sex practically all the time. Granted, not a large sample size, but added to general experience with women it's really just less out in the open.
 
Seriously, I think the bigger question is, why is women's libido so low? Maybe it's because it gets beaten down so much.

Because human beings are born requiring a large amount of obligate maternal care. Thus the cost of bad mate selection is much more severe for females than it is for males, so females tend to be much more selective with whom they mate with. They have to be, because women are left holding the baby.

If parental investment, and the reproductive opportunity cost of pregnancy was shared symmetrically between the two sexes, then male and female sexuality would (eventually) be much more similar, even identical. That's rare in placental mammals, but somewhat common in birds.
 
Women do not have the same testosterone levels as men.

Women are just as libido-driven, they're just more coy about it in public.

Dunno, all my past gfs were perpetually horny and wanted sex practically all the time. Granted, not a large sample size, but added to general experience with women it's really just less out in the open.

Be glad they generally aren't as high. Look at the pooners who do take testosterone, they turn into degenerates. It wouldn't just be a couple of horny girlfriends. It'd be worse.

That said, some level of attraction has to happen, I guess. Dunno why it has to be so askew. Don't couples try to try and reach each other's level? Or is that a lost art now?

It's like, yeah, it's probably low because of reasons above. But do you have to knock it down even lower? Again, do men want women to be attracted to them at all?
 
Last edited:
They'd neg. They'd fuss about her not being a 9 or a 10 or her ass being flat having a zit or some other petty shit about appearance. They'd cry about her being a used up roastie. They'd say she just wants your nonexistant money. They'd cry about her being annoying, the list goes on...
Maybe here they would. But that's not a thing in real life or for most men.

I don't know many people who would dare to judge some guy's girlfriend like this. And it would seriously weird me out if someone around me did.
 
Again, do men want women to be attracted to them at all?
For sure. I think most men would love it if women hit on them and showed interest more openly and directly. There's a reason men tend to remember every single compliment they got from a woman that isn't their mom fondly. Massive confidence boost.
Some disparity here is also in who is more willing to compromise in looks and status. Particularly status (job/income) tends to be rather secondary for men, and looks can also be compromised on. Although the latter is also true for women, there there's a tendency to compromise more on looks if personality and status are right. I realize "status" sounds like PUA bullshit, but I'm using it here as more catch-all term for income, self-sufficiency, confidence and personality.
It also depends on whether it's for a fling or a long term relationship. I guess women tend to be more comfortable with long term relationships with less sexual attraction as long as the rest works out, while men prefer a long term relationship with more focus on sexual attraction. That'd potentially result in more women in long term relationship with less sexual attraction and thus maybe less displayed horniness.
I don't know, it all boils down to individual behaviours and how they average out over many people. Can't really draw too many conclusions from it, when you think about it.
Can just go from my own personal experience, wherein women are also just horny af. But maybe I'm just a 10/10 gigachad so my perspective is skewed.
 
Women do not have the same testosterone levels as men.
The most popular anabolic steroid for women is oxandrolone, and it's the only steroid that women are recommended to use because it's very mild and causes much less masculinization than any other option. While taking oxandrolone, a woman's testosterone levels will be 100x-200x lower than the standard testosterone production in a healthy, non-steroid using male. Even with those tiny amounts, it creates the most jacked women on the planet.

In the context of horniness and sexual impulsivity, women taking testosterone (mostly bodybuilders and pooners) are about on par with gay men and pubescent teenage boys. Women that attempt to match natural male testosterone levels end up physically morphing into monsters with extreme tendencies towards violence. Prolonged male test levels will just outright kill you through organ failure, and you're going to look like a fucking mess as it happens.

Doctors that prescribe HRT to young women should have a millstone tied around their neck before being thrown into the sea.
 
I wish that was true, I'd have taken more opportunities with chicks that I regret passing up, especially when I was younger.
 
Because OnlyFans needs its customer base.
 
You asking the question is proof that women are slaves to their libidos. To revolt against the sexual drive out of frustration, or out disappointment, or from simple self-loathing, is to permit desire its place as the central governing principle of human action. The beast remains horny even if it chooses to hate what it loves, and there is no escape from the animal within.

To compensate for their failures, some have become artists, others saints, but most join forums catering to the maladjusted and post threads crafted by their lonely hearts.

I'm sure everyone here is the exception, however, towering above human foibles like Simeon Stylites.
 
Last edited:
Back