Why are Muslims so weak?

Seriously, what gives? They started a war with Moishe Shekelstein, got absolutely destroyed, and now their women are crying in the streets for a ceasefire while the men are in hiding. Pathetic!
How many threads to suck up to Israel and Jews do you need?
They're "weak" cause Moshe gets the gorillions from their dumb golem, the US.
Moshe has F35s and endless bombs and missiles.
Moshe has nukes.
Palestinians don't even have borders or a state, all because of Moshe and John Smith.
Truly an alliance made in hell.
I thought you were supposed to be a great NATO and US critic, but you're just fine with them providing Israel with the tools to kill Arabs.
Pathetic tbh. Russia and Israel supporters literally picked the worst combo.
 
How many threads to suck up to Israel and Jews do you need?
They're "weak" cause Moshe gets the gorillions from their dumb golem, the US.
Moshe has F35s and endless bombs and missiles.
Moshe has nukes.
Palestinians don't even have borders or a state, all because of Moshe and John Smith.
Truly an alliance made in hell.
I thought you were supposed to be a great NATO and US critic, but you're just fine with them providing Israel with the tools to kill Arabs.
Pathetic tbh. Russia and Israel supports literally picked the worst combo.
Who cares about the Palestinians, I'm talking about the Islamic world in general. It's by far the worst religion to come out of the Middle East, it promotes individual weakness, rejects critical thinking, and promotes a lack of accountability. It's all in Allah's hands. Or the Imam's. But never yours.

Islam has never been capable of creating great works or great art or performing great deeds. The only scientific and cultural accomplishments that can be attributed to Islam were stolen from other cultures. It stifles creativity and innovation, promotes degeneracy and destruction. How many great works of art and valuable cultural artifacts were destroyed by Islam just in the last 25 years?

Ridding the planet of Islam should be the goal of every single civilized individual. Simping for Islam won't make them give you any mercy, for they also don't find weakness appealing.
 
Ridding the planet of Islam should be the goal of every single civilized individual. Simping for Islam won't make them give you any mercy, for they also don't find weakness appealing.
You cannot rid the planet of its 2nd largest religion, you numbnut. All you can do is sperg on KF about it.
Why would I need mercy? I've been for months in Syria, and I've had a blast, from the large city to the super-conservative rural area. I would fit just as well in Russia or Japan cause I easily adapt and never try to fuck with the natives. The only places I could not fit in are progressive shitholes and niggerlands.
 
You cannot rid the planet of its 2nd largest religion, you numbnut. All you can do is sperg on KF about it.
Why would I need mercy? I've been for months in Syria, and I've had a blast, from the large city to the super-conservative rural area. I would fit just as well in Russia or Japan cause I easily adapt and never try to fuck with the natives. The only places I could not fit in are progressive shitholes and niggerlands.
Inbreeding, mongoloidism, and Israeli JDAMs are doing all the work already. Just don't be an Islam supporter, that's all. Or do you think it's sustainable to have a population where the average IQ is 65 and marrying your first cousin is considered normal? Problem with Islam if you don't stop it is that they'll outbreed you, then won't be able to maintain your society, and let things collapse into another dark age.

I see no reply to the fact that Islam has never produced any great works of art or really anything of cultural significance except for that black cube with the metal vagina that they all seem to want to kiss. No great architectural works, nothing. Yes, even Alhambra wasn't actually built by Muslims but stolen from a Jew (see a pattern yet?)
Point is, Islam is just as anti-human and anti-civilization as the worst of the globohomo ideologies. The combination of low IQs, propensity for violence, and a divine mandate to rule the world is dangerous to say the least.

Why would anyone support Hamas AND Ukraine unless they have a fetish for losing and humiliation? Why do Eurocucks find bad qualities like weakness and cowardice so attractive?
 
Last edited:
The only scientific and cultural accomplishments that can be attributed to Islam were stolen from other cultures.

I would like to introduce you to the number 0, the concept of it is purely Islamic / Arabic particularly when it comes to advanced mathematics, That they where the stuards of Ancient Knowledge while the early Church was on a "Burn anything that was written by filthy pagans" kick and kept them safe for several centuries until the anti-intellectual movement died down around 1000ad , they also had there own schools of Metallurgy and Advanced Agriculture including hydrology that they invented independent of Western Knowledge - let alone some other fields where they kicked Europe's arse for a long long time like Ceramics particularly in coloured glazes and Medicine they where 500+ years in advance of Europe because we clung onto ideas that where observably false but Medicine was nearly always the purview of the church.

I am all for being critical of people when they do something wrong but to say that they never invented or discovered anything is intellectually and historically dishonest, if you need to be critical of someone or some people as a whole point to where they are wrong and how far they have fallen from greatness not only is it honest but also carry's more weight.

It stifles creativity and innovation, promotes degeneracy and destruction. How many great works of art and valuable cultural artifacts were destroyed by Islam just in the last 25 years?

Now it does yes, that's because Islam for all it's faults is a quazi decentralised religion with a majority of it's followers stemming from having precisely zero education that is not religiously focused even in "developed "nations, allowing for a vast swing towards the anti-intellectual, this was common in Europe 400 years ago (an trust me you'd not like to live in Europe 400 years ago or the American Colonies such as they where) Christians have destroyed pre Christian artifacts and did it all the time, stone circles destroyed, languages and traditions destroyed at worst or co-opted at best, pre-christian religious sites being specificity destroyed and a Church being built ontop, forced conversions of Pagans or people who believe in the wrong sort of Christianity.

Yea Islam is doing that now and it's fucking disgusting that people are doing it but don't try and come at this from a holier than though angle because you can't do so without clean hands, call it backwards an barbaric and condemn it but don't say "We never did it" say we did it an learned from our mistakes.

I am not defending Islam or any current acts people do in it's name I find the whole backwards nature of it's majority current practitioners to be absurd and deeply worrying that we are allowing people into the western world who hold such ideas and have no desire to integrate infuriating and harmful.

But your argument is based on emotion, not good sound logic and reason that are the corner stones of Western civilisation since the Renaissance.

You want to know the three things that made Europe become a powerhouse of Science, Technology and Culture -
1) Liberalisation of education to not just be the domain of the church.
2) Liberalisation of wealth that wasn't inside Royalty or the Church.
3) Trans fair of powers that where traditionally religious in nature to the secular power, such as sharing of information and language.
4) The Printing press, allowing for information to be widely copied and deceminated without Religious interference.
5) A desire to reclaim what was lost by the fall of Rome i.e. a Desire to live upto the great feats of the past if not surpass them.

It wasn't easy it wasn't pleasant and a lot of blood, ink and other fluids had to be spilled for us to get to where we are as a society today, the problem is in the West (and I have to say this and particularly parts of America) is sliding backwards because your allowing one or two minor parts of society and civilisation as a whole to dominate your intellectual and social realm and are forgetting that it has to be a balancing act with propagation of your ideals and people as a whole and not just one or two specific aspects of it becoming the dominant force.
 
I would like to introduce you to the number 0, the concept of it is purely Islamic / Arabic particularly when it comes to advanced mathematics, That they where the stuards of Ancient Knowledge while the early Church was on a "Burn anything that was written by filthy pagans"
Personally I find it amazing that Archimedes invented trig a thousand years before the Muslims came around and gifted us with their divine revelation of zero.

It must have been very difficult to not be able to quantify things that don’t exist
 
I would like to introduce you to the number 0, the concept of it is purely Islamic / Arabic particularly when it comes to advanced mathematics, That they where the stuards of Ancient Knowledge while the early Church was on a "Burn anything that was written by filthy pagans" kick and kept them safe for several centuries until the anti-intellectual movement died down around 1000ad , they also had there own schools of Metallurgy and Advanced Agriculture including hydrology that they invented independent of Western Knowledge - let alone some other fields where they kicked Europe's arse for a long long time like Ceramics particularly in coloured glazes.
But wasn't Al-Khwarizmi a Zoroastrian who was forcefully converted to Islam? That goes back to my point that a lot of the mathematic and scientific achievements that are now attributed to Islam have been essentially taken by force from other cultures during the Islamic conquests. Their claimed discoveries of glazing, metallurgy, and other such may have been new to Europe (who just emerged from a dark age) but still could be traced back to the Romans, Greeks, Indians, Babylonians, and Egyptians. For example: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/history-of-zero/

As for the church during the dark age, I agree, think about how much progress could've been achieved without them stifling innovation and destroying ancient knowledge. But hopefully we can learn from that and avoid another dark age by not letting Islam take root in Europe and America, leading to a cultural, scientific, and societal decline.
 
Last edited:
As I said, being a Russian Zionist is literally the dirtiest, cringiest combo, followed by Anglotard Zionists.
It's rather amazing how Euros got so brainwashed to avoid doing anything to advance their own interests. You derive sexual pleasure out of destroying your future, don't you?

I don't know what kind of brain damage caused you people to simp for those who exhibit the worst qualities a human can possibly have, but at this point I think it's incurable.
 
It's rather amazing how Euros got so brainwashed to avoid doing anything to advance their own interests. You derive sexual pleasure out of destroying your future, don't you?
That's fucking rich coming from the land of tranny and nigger lovers.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Seafarer
Personally I find it amazing that Archimedes invented trig a thousand years before the Muslims came around and gifted us with their divine revelation of zero.

It must have been very difficult to not be able to quantify things that don’t exist

There was an a lot lot of exchange in that period that's not documented, as I said it's Arabic / Islam based but the concept is attributed to persia an arabia, but you are right in that it predates islam.

Archimedes's work was prety much preserved by Islamic scholars btw, his works where mostly forgotten or destroyed during the fall of Rome, however scrolls from his students also got misattributed to him, but thats a fairly common thing.

That goes back to my point that a lot of the mathematic and scientific achievements that are now attributed to Islam have been essentially taken by force from other cultures during the Islamic conquests.

And? Christian Scholars used Arabic translations of earlier Roman an Greek works to fill in the blanks they still had in others works, they also kicked arse in Medicine because they where not hide bound by Roman traditions taught by the Church as irrefutable fact.

Their claimed discoveries of glazing, metallurgy, and other such may have been new to Europe (who just emerged from a dark age) but still could be traced back to the Romans, Greeks, Indians, Babylonians, and Egyptians.

I am going to single out metallurgy here because it's something I know the most about but I am part of the ever growing camp that the Roman's had Steel and knew how to make it they just had a really inefficient process for the Ore's they used, Damascus (the real stuff not the pattern welded shite you see today) was produced in a more controlled Crucible method where the Carbon source (normally bone char or char coal) by weight and included some other elements like a fresh plant matter (i.e. hydrogen source) to promote various other carbides to form from trace elements - In Europe we used mostly Aristotle Furnaces small intentionally destroyed as part of the process methods to produce Steel, Arabia just had a easer material source to work with so where able to manufacture it in higher quantities an developed processes to do it - but the only reason we even know in detail about the Aristole forge was it was copied from Greek an Roman texts by Arabic scholars from original sources because it was a subject beneath the Church's attention so was ignored along side it's vandalism or older histories an records.

Inversely we had a greater an easy access to carbon sources both for fuel and transport that lead to our later dominance in Iron an Steel production.

Also I would like to point out that with early steels it's very easy to fuck them up with over heating leading to decarbonisation, we in Europe mitigated this by Caking an folding our iron an steel into smaller blocker bars or clumps of stock, in Arabic countries they did it by working out the work and twisting an folding and this lead to a marked preference between the different kinds of stock an tong used by Smiths an other metal workers that you can see to this day (Spain is a weird transitional of both an goes by region).

Now this is where I get a bit multi disciplinary - Arabia an the Islamic world had us in colour treatments in there technology, no denying that they just did but WE had the upper hand in better base quality and performance, Europe once we got out of the funk of the end of Rome an Catholic retardation being less generally prevalent started making pots with basic colours that lasted far longer at higher heat than the Arabic / Islamic world.

So when we did relearn Crucible Technology we where better for it, and also allowed for much larger smelting oeprations to begin that nothing else could match.

As for the church during the dark age, I agree, think about how much progress could've been achieved without them stifling innovation and destroying ancient knowledge. But hopefully we can learn from that and avoid another dark age by not letting Islam take root in Europe and America, leading to a cultural, scientific, and societal decline.

Nothing I said in my last post disagreed with that, if we don't stamp down hard on recidivism someone in 1000 years will be painting this about us-
Screenshot 2023-12-19 at 20-10-49 The Course of Empire (paintings) - Wikipedia.png

I was arguing that we should not be saying they haven't done anything before now, and that we should be focusing on a legitimate argument that they have stopped doing anything at all - Castigation is very rarely an improving tactic, shame an a fall from grace is - and saying We in the west come from a background of clean hands harms the argument and is flat out wrong and to beat the decline we have to be better an offer a soloution not just lean into the downwards slide.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: MidUSA and Seafarer
And? Christian Scholars used Arabic translations of earlier Roman an Greek works to fill in the blanks they still had in others works, they also kicked arse in Medicine because they where not hide bound by Roman traditions taught by the Church as irrefutable fact.
I'll give it to Islam that unlike the early church they did not discriminate against those earlier discoveries just due to the nature of them being pagan in origin, but that doesn't make them Islamic discoveries. As for medicine, not being bound by Roman traditions was an advantage, but they also got a lot of hands-on practice due to the constant ongoing Islamic conquests which gave them plenty of opportunity to practice medicine on a wide variety of patients of varying degrees of injuries.

As for the west coming from a background of clean hands, that's definitely not the case. The west came from a background of conquest and dark age as well, but also one of Enlightenment, which Islam hasn't had and may never will. If Islam has an Enlightenment moment, whatever is going to emerge from the other side isn't going to be Islam anyway.

That's fucking rich coming from the land of tranny and nigger lovers.
I'm not American, sorry bro.
 
Last edited:
Back