Why are so many "gender critical feminists" not critical of The Science in any other way?

I am unvaxxed. Do you base this on anything other then "this would be a fun thing to get mad about"? There are many other medical issues being discussed and criticized by feminists, ofc they mostly affect WOMEN because, duh? There is a lot of feminist discourse around birth control, breastfeeding, childbirth, IVF, surrogacy or the fact that most research in the medical industry is done only on men leading to much difficulty in diagnosing women's health issues cause they often present with different symptoms than men, react to medications differently due to having a different metabolism etc. You have probably never heard of women discussing any of this cause I presume you don't hang out in feminist spaces.
 
I am unvaxxed. Do you base this on anything other then "this would be a fun thing to get mad about"? There are many other medical issues being discussed and criticized by feminists, ofc they mostly affect WOMEN because, duh? There is a lot of feminist discourse around birth control, breastfeeding, childbirth, IVF, surrogacy or the fact that most research in the medical industry is done only on men leading to much difficulty in diagnosing women's health issues cause they often present with different symptoms than men, react to medications differently due to having a different metabolism etc. You have probably never heard of women discussing any of this cause I presume you don't hang out in feminist spaces.
So what you're saying is, feminists focus on aspects of physiology in which women are the primary focus.

What does this have to do with the topic?
 
So what you're saying is, feminists focus on aspects of physiology in which women are the primary focus.

What does this have to do with the topic?
He asked why feminists don't question other things regarding science and medicine, I am telling you they do but they are issues that pertain to women (cause duh, feminism is about women's issues) so you probably haven't heard much of this discourse because it's not as visible as the tranny shit. Do you need me to draw in crayon for you?

If you were to ever visit a place like mumsnet you wouldn't even ask this dumb question.
 
The title is the whole question. I notice in particular a lot of these ladies are covid vax enthusiasts/CDC bootlickers. And of course they believe the chronically unprovable "born that way" hypothesis.

How can people go so far into the weeds comprehending that the medical system has utterly corrupted itself over troonery, without questioning a whole lot of other assumptions?
Come on, you already know this.
Terfs are still bluepilled idiots. They just don't like trannies because they replaced them on the victimhood totem pole. For fuck's sake, their queen in the form of JKR still cries over the poor Pakistani rape gangs.
 
He asked why feminists don't question other things regarding science and medicine, I am telling you they do but they are issues that pertain to women (cause duh, feminism is about women's issues) so you probably haven't heard much of this discourse because it's not as visible as the tranny shit. Do you need me to draw in crayon for you?

If you were to ever visit a place like mumsnet you wouldn't even ask this dumb question.
I don't think you can say they broadly focus on all other aspects of medical sciences while also stating that their focus is predominantly upon matters of health that pertain to women.

Instead of going "You're asking a dumb question because you're not looking in this highly specific place you may not have even heard of before asking your question," why don't you post examples to help elucidate your point from this resource?
 
I don't think you can say they broadly focus on all other aspects of medical sciences while also stating that their focus is predominantly upon matters of health that pertain to women.

Instead of going "You're asking a dumb question because you're not looking in this highly specific place you may not have even heard of before asking your question," why don't you post examples to help elucidate your point from this resource?
I have already given you several examples and told you where to look if you're actually interested in seeing women discuss things like "Is hormonal birth control pushed by big pharma on women who don't need it without properly educating about possible side effects?" or "Why do doctors force women to give birth laying on their back when that's the least natural position possible and leads to more birth injuries?" I assume since you're a male you're not actually interested in any of this, you just want to claim "wahmen stupid" and then celebrate.

Women dominate alternative and holistic medicine because women have always been more critical of western medicine and more health-conscious than men are, most men don't even go to the doctor.
 
I have already given you several examples and told you where to look if you're actually interested in seeing women discuss things like "Is hormonal birth control pushed by big pharma on women who don't need it without properly educating about possible side effects?" or "Why do doctors force women to give birth laying on their back when that's the least natural position possible and leads to more birth injuries?" I assume since you're a male you're not actually interested in any of this, you just want to claim "wahmen stupid" and then celebrate.

Women dominate alternative and holistic medicine because women have always been more critical of western medicine and more health-conscious than men are, most men don't even go to the doctor.
I think you're making unfair assumptions based on unsubstantiated conjecture.

You gave examples of subjects that are discussed in these places, which, again, are largely focused on women's health and not medical sciences as a whole, but did not delve into the particulars too deeply. You are right in that I have no interest in looking in that space for myself to try and verify your claims. I am, in fact, arguing for the sake of argumentation with regards to your assertions that don't seem to prove or disprove anything about the topic that is being presented in this thread.

How does this stop you from taking screenshots or posting archived links of your resource? And have you seen the cost of healthcare, even with insurance, not to mention the minutiae of ways in which both medical care and the insurances will trump up the costs and co-pays of even basic services? That, in and of itself, should more than explain why men are less inclined to see the doctor, ingrained social behaviors and pressures notwithstanding. There's a whole other argument to be had there.
 
I have already given you several examples and told you where to look if you're actually interested in seeing women discuss things like "Is hormonal birth control pushed by big pharma on women who don't need it without properly educating about possible side effects?" or "Why do doctors force women to give birth laying on their back when that's the least natural position possible and leads to more birth injuries?"
Hormonal birth control saved me from disfiguring cystic acne, I later got pregnant with healthy babies exactly when I wanted to, and while I labored in childbirth, I was only capable of sitting on the toilet or lying on my back. I chose not to sit on the toilet. If you had tried to position me on hands and knees or on my side, I would have snarled and bitten you.

You don’t have to be crunchy granola to not want your daughters to be forced to suck tranny dick.

I’m totally blackpilled on therapy, though.
 
You gave examples of subjects that are discussed in these places, which, again, are largely focused on women's health and not medical sciences as a whole, but did not delve into the particulars too deeply. You are right in that I have no interest in looking in that space for myself to try and verify your claims. I am, in fact, arguing for the sake of argumentation with regards to your assertions that don't seem to prove or disprove anything about the topic that is being presented in this thread.
because we don't need a feminist forum to discuss these other theories, we go to any other popular conspiracy or alt health site and participate there without mentioning feminism, but feminist sites will only have issues and conspiracy theories that are about women's issues, because you usually won't find that on general conspiracy sites and we can discuss them without men butting in with other stuff.
 
because we don't need a feminist forum to discuss these other theories, we go to any other popular conspiracy or alt health site and participate there without mentioning feminism, but feminist sites will only have issues and conspiracy theories that are about women's issues, because you usually won't find that on general conspiracy sites and we can discuss them without men butting in with other stuff.
Again, what does that have to do with the subject of "gender critical feminists not being critical of medical science in any other way" if feminism doesn't, and doesn't need to, come up within the hemisphere of discussion whatsoever on those other spaces? I know some of the other posters ITT are painting women under broad strokes with some of their replies. That has nothing to do with my line of questioning though.
 
Again, what does that have to do with the subject of "gender critical feminists not being critical of medical science in any other way" if feminism doesn't, and doesn't need to, come up within the hemisphere of discussion whatsoever on those other spaces? I know some of the other posters ITT are painting women under broad strokes with some of their replies. That has nothing to do with my line of questioning though.
Literally all we're asking is critical of medical science in general. Take chemicals in the drinking water. I don't see feminists talking about that. Its stuff like that.
 
Why are so many "gender critical feminists" not critical of The Science in any other way?
They are. Feminism, like any socialist (aligned) idea, is by its very nature in denial critical of science whenever observable reality doesn't match the ideological dogma. The most infamous example being the selective denial of human sexual dimorphism.
 
Last edited:
Back