I'm hearing a lot of talk about "oh noo my hobbies I'm a catch but my hooobiieess".
Have you thought about just getting better hobbies? What's with this brand loyalty to the way you categorize the aesthetics you consume?
I'm a dyed-in-the-wool autist. If I never expanded beyond /mlp/ and e621 i'd be in a much worse position in life. You gotta be learning history, philosophy, aesthetics; more than anything else, the art of conversation. It's not about what you like. It's about being able to understand what they like, and drawing that out of them.
Behind the branding it's all the same thing.
I'd like to give an update that after reading a few pre 20th century books on women, when people actually were willing to talk about the distinctions, I get the appeal now.
They're able to understand you in a holistic way rather than the discrete (not "discreet", you wise-acres; I don't mean "on the down low") way that men do.
That seems to be part of what's meant by referring to women as "the image of the image" and "the glory of the glory".