Why do dumbasses on here think every disruptive poster is just trolling

YellowIsACoolColor

It's true.
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 7, 2022
For every argument had with a disruptive poster you'll have one retard talking about how good of a troll they are. Why?
 
I think part of it is many of the people who come here to "troll" are usually people who see they have a thread. They think that by shitting up their own thread that it will end the thread and get people to lose interest. They talk in circles and dodge questions, and they truly believe they are "trolling" the people here and are winning. A good example of this is Nik Talbott who came here originally to get the Farms to harrass a 14 year old girl. He finally got banned Monday for posting semi-nude images in his own thread about said girl. These types of people are not smart.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Toji Suzuhara
They think that by shitting up their own thread that it will end the thread and get people to lose interest.
I don't know about your example with that guy, but this is often the opposite, they shit up whatever thread in order to perpetuate the conversation, why? Because they're attention-whoring.

They want people to gain interest, not lose it.
 
I don't know about your example with that guy, but this is often the opposite, they shit up whatever thread in order to perpetuate the conversation, why? Because they're attention-whoring.

They want people to gain interest, not lose it.
I'd say it's a combination of both. Talbott would spend his time talking in circles, refusing to answer people's questions, then try and get forum members to focus on other people.
 
On a different note, declaring to troll is a bit like observing a particle. Like, trolling is the "unobserved" particle which can be whatever until someone actively brings up trolling, the observing, be it the person themselves or someone else. Then that state immediately collapses to be gay attention whoring and is in fact not trolling anymore, or however that stuff goes in the physics.
What were we talking about again?
 
Back