- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
im aware, i said as much. what caused it? why does a consistant and radical change in the direction of the trend line coincide with radical changes in immigration law?
oh, like reliably transporting people from hati to Springfield ohio, totally separate things
oh, so importing immigrants causes a change in the value of the labor. crazy.
and what does that do to the value of the labor of the employees who lost their job because it was outsourced? how about their wages, do they go up or down when their factory is moved from where they live to china?
You keep coming back to immigration so I'm going to tie this all together in a nice bow.
If immigration is as such a serious to threat labor and the main driver to dilution in wages as you say. And I'm saying that increased production, computerization, and simplification of the labor market making the labor have far less value. The average immigrant is an untrained, uneducated, barely speaks English and their migration is more than enough to stagnant wages on American laborers which all have far higher levels of education, far better communicators, and are far more numerous; you are proving my point. The job is so simple now that Jose who just learned to tie his shoes so he could get away from INS is replacing better educated local labor, then Jose doesn't deserve better wages, neither does Joe Ohio because he is easily replacable by someone who doesn't even speak English.