Why do Reactionaries Think that Being Repressed/Deplatformed Means They're Winning?

[analrapist]

My issue is less whether truth wins and whether we are returning to an era of the High priest class dictating truth until that era collapses as well

The historical pattern is that: Society is ruled by the demos. Easy times make weak men. Weak men are conquered by an evil high priest class. The evil high priest class is overthrown by demos or a good high priest. Demos is ascendant again. All this censorship is just the "conquered by an evil high priest" part. The sacred text of our current evil high priests is the Talmud.

 

[Anasûrimbor Kellhus]

Some people still believe in the ridiculous pendulum swing. What they don't realize is it is a foolish idea that randomly things will just return to the other side of politics, so they let their enemies keep gaining power not realizing, that's not how it works.

boomers seem to believe this a lot they just have this inherent faith that "oh well that's how its always been one side takes power then the other side does" because they haven't known anything except the america 2 party clown show for all their lives. History of course teaches us otherwise.

 

[anon483637]

Pendulum theory is the ultimate coping mechanism. Losing feels bad, winning feels good, and it lets you reframe all evidence of you losing as evidence you're ackshully about to win.

 

[The Gene Genie]

You think like a racist. I'm talking about ideology. The world is on a path to being stratefied by ideology, not genetic lineage. The orthodox reactionary position is that God is no respecter of persons.

The Original Sin of the New World is the White Race, who embodies the Devil in full form. That's what their ideology is. There's no way around it. I don't see how you can't see it, that all of this "woke" and "leftist" shit is actually just a roundabout way of suppressing Whites, dismantling White Society, and annihilating the White Race. There is no ideology for the "other side" without that implicit understanding that what they're fighting against transcends any "belief" and is fully encapsulated by the desire to see the multitude of Races in the World unite to kill the White Race off once and for all.

For what it's worth, I think it's pretty much done and dusted. I don't see how things can change at this point without a complete and total system collapse across the board, although I suppose I'm open to an alternative viewpoint on this. Most people are either complicit and okay with this (to include the other Races. Why would they care about White Culture, White Society, and the White Race being destroyed?) or are so blind and asleep that they don't know or care that it's happening. And the ones that are aware delude themselves into thinking something will change. But we've been on this course for over a hundred years now and all that it's gotten us is
>A minority in our own countries
>Our children the targets of trannies and pedophilic groomers
>Every media and governmental organization ostracizing us and eliminating us

The window of opportunity passed a long time ago. Most of the children in all White countries aren't White. So where does that leave us?

 

[analrapist]

So where does that leave us?

That leaves us in a circumstance where the White race, with its historically superior capacity for war, is placed into a circumstance where war is a prerequisite for continued existence. My bet is on White, to mirror your language.

The "orthodox reactionary" position I describe is the Christian. To us, the war is against the ideology of Talmud. This perspective is not universal, but enough of the ones running things know enough. Consider Steven Anderson, E Michael Jones, Ye.

I am functionally your ally. We differ on a few presuppositions. Your lens is race, mine is faith.

When I say "you think like a racist", I want to be clear that I'm not using that as a pejorative, but more as an acknowledgement; you reading it as an honor because you identify as a racist is my hope and expectation. I'm just trying to explain that I can't agree with you on that particular point.

You see the same evil I do. Our worldviews just differ on how things ought to be instead. But we need to deal with Them first. Then we can sort that out. And I like the idea of segregation in principle.

 

[The Ugly One]

Whenever the left rolls out new censorship laws, hate speech laws, anti-misgendering laws, etc. Reactionaries always get excited that the threat of imprisonment for stepping out of line with the left will ensure the left's defeat.
But this never happens and just gives the left more power to crack down on dissent.

It's because the reactionary-right believes that any of the compromises and horse-trading needed to actually acquire power and use it are unworthy of them, so their strategy is to sit around, do nothing, write blogs, and hope that one day, in a flash, the people suddenly get sick of the left, go find the right where they're hiding, and hand them absolute power, begging them to save us.

 

[Misericordia]

As a user with a reactionary PFP I feel the need to say that TRVE reactionaries take the long view on history. The end of liberal democracy might not come in 5 years, or 10 years, or 50 years, but it will come, eventually. It's a characteristic of young men to believe that they themselves personally are the generation that will turn everything around and overthrow the established order, but nearly every generation is mistaken about that.
Another basic tenet of reactionary thinking is that power generally perpetuates itself and is only rarely overthrown. This contradicts the prevailing liberal idea that history is a continual sequence of powers being overthrown by "the people" or whatever. In this way, the continuing ascendency of liberal democracy is ironically a manifestation of reactionary ideology.

 

[Angry Alt Right Nerd]

It's just another iteration of coping because reactionaries are weak-willed faggots who can't face reality.