Why do you lean left?

Unless your a straight white man. Then you can go to hell. That was the message they sent out. So you have to figure out why, they would do such a silly thing as alienate the white men.
Saying that women and minorities deserve good lives too doesn't mean that straight white men are evil and deserve bad lives. Unless you're in something like gender studies or black history, you won't get discriminated against for being a straight white man. If you think right-wingers care about you as a straight white man, you've got another thing coming for ya. If you're not politically or financially useful to right-wingers, you can starve on the street for all they care. You won't have the education and welfare support the left has fought to give everyone, male or female, straight or gay, white or black.
 
you won't get discriminated against for being a straight white man.
You do realise that it was that exact message that lost the Democrats the election right? They panicked and had fucking Will Farrell hassling white men in the street. Over the fact they lost the white men vote.
Unless you're in something like gender studies or black history
LMFAO. I have seen it at my work as well. I have seen what happens, gas lighting wont work on me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Coldgrip
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Coldgrip
One second “the left” is a bunch of rich costal elites, the next they’re a bunch of basement dwelling poor people. So interesting how retarded this nonsense is.

If you literally cannot picture it being more complicated than one specific demographic representing an entire political category, how in the fuck can you comprehend the "left" and the "right" duality in the first place?


Here's the long answer: The left is composed of 4 main groups to me. 95% of left leaning belief is either naivety, guilt or just simply lack of independent thought.

A: the Naive college student.
They are majoring in gender studies and will be 250K in debt when they graduate and go work at starbucks for slightly above minimum wage. They will be in debt for the next 20 years for this. Does that sound like someone to understands economics to you?

B: The social exploiter/explotee.
Fun fact, before Al Sharpton became a civil rights leader he brokered large cocaine deals, this is not a conspiracy theory it's on FBI video tape; he threatened to sue media companies publishing the videos of this. This is was during the height of the crack cocaine epidemic decimating the black community. He and many many others who emulated him (Sean king, Ben Crump etc etc) convinced retarded white people the black man is still suffering from something over 300 years ago and that excuses all personal decisions on their part. Brokering deals for kilo's of coke then becoming a civil rights leader a few year later when the drug lord thing didnt' work out. Would you trust this man? His modern equivalent? Look into Ben Crump and conspiring to commit perjury with at least 5 other parties in a certain criminal case in Florida the whole fucking country was obsessed with. So you better vote democrat to be socially responsible otherwise the black man is going to keep get fucked over. (Please don't Google the "13/51 statistics" otherwise their theory makes no sense) for more information on following this social policy on this, google "Chicago"

C: The "Communism works, trust me". Every single fucking time a successful nation institutes communism or even heavy handed socialism it falls apart in about 3-4 decades at best and I do mean at best and in the meantime the leaders of such nation live lavish hypocritical lifestyles while the proletariat will never ever even approach. Stalin loved to secretly watch American Films, and then there's the whole killing a few million people "thing" he did and Gulags. Mao decided to publicly humiliate /torture/ kill all the educated independent thinkers who realized his was an unsustainable system. If you are old enough to use a computer you should already know the recent history of Venezuela and how that's going.

D: "Jump the fuck right off that bridge" . There are about 101 videos on social media of grabbing random protestors at leftist rallys and asking them basic questions on the the topic they are protesting for/against and they can't even answer them. Here's a great one, go to an anti gun rally and ask any random person why the AR-15 needs to be banned but the Ruger Mini-14 doesn't. They both shoot the same bullets, have 30 round mags and are just as easily accessible. Show them a picture of the two rifles and even ask why the more "reasonable ones" believe the AR-15 is bad and the Ruger mini-14 should be allowed. They clearly don't even understand why the fuck they are even there, the logical conclusion is someone they trusted told them to be there or they just trusted some someone running for political office this was important somehow and then they failed to think independently to even research the numbers. Google "mike Nifong" for a great example of man morally bankrupt public official whipping his voters into a frenzy and I do mean a frenzy just to further his career at the cost of framing innocent lives.
 
For me personally it's because I agree with the Jacobins that the French King should be beheaded at once.
In essence; the right is stasis and the left for better or worse represents change, and one way or another I believe in the power of motion.
This is because conservatives and the soul of what is the right don't care for the forgotten future, they want to gather up the dead dust of what they want to go back to and have no interest in laying down fertilizer for fresh growth, the kind which is only possible through the power of shoving Louis' neck into a guillotine.
 
If you literally cannot picture it being more complicated than one specific demographic representing an entire political category, how in the fuck can you comprehend the "left" and the "right" duality in the first place?


Here's the long answer: The left is composed of 4 main groups to me. 95% of left leaning belief is either naivety, guilt or just simply lack of independent thought.

A: the Naive college student.
They are majoring in gender studies and will be 250K in debt when they graduate and go work at starbucks for slightly above minimum wage. They will be in debt for the next 20 years for this. Does that sound like someone to understands economics to you?

B: The social exploiter/explotee.
Fun fact, before Al Sharpton became a civil rights leader he brokered large cocaine deals, this is not a conspiracy theory it's on FBI video tape; he threatened to sue media companies publishing the videos of this. This is was during the height of the crack cocaine epidemic decimating the black community. He and many many others who emulated him (Sean king, Ben Crump etc etc) convinced retarded white people the black man is still suffering from something over 300 years ago and that excuses all personal decisions on their part. Brokering deals for kilo's of coke then becoming a civil rights leader a few year later when the drug lord thing didnt' work out. Would you trust this man? His modern equivalent? Look into Ben Crump and conspiring to commit perjury with at least 5 other parties in a certain criminal case in Florida the whole fucking country was obsessed with. So you better vote democrat to be socially responsible otherwise the black man is going to keep get fucked over. (Please don't Google the "13/51 statistics" otherwise their theory makes no sense) for more information on following this social policy on this, google "Chicago"

C: The "Communism works, trust me". Every single fucking time a successful nation institutes communism or even heavy handed socialism it falls apart in about 3-4 decades at best and I do mean at best and in the meantime the leaders of such nation live lavish hypocritical lifestyles while the proletariat will never ever even approach. Stalin loved to secretly watch American Films, and then there's the whole killing a few million people "thing" he did and Gulags. Mao decided to publicly humiliate /torture/ kill all the educated independent thinkers who realized his was an unsustainable system. If you are old enough to use a computer you should already know the recent history of Venezuela and how that's going.

D: "Jump the fuck right off that bridge" . There are about 101 videos on social media of grabbing random protestors at leftist rallys and asking them basic questions on the the topic they are protesting for/against and they can't even answer them. Here's a great one, go to an anti gun rally and ask any random person why the AR-15 needs to be banned but the Ruger Mini-14 doesn't. They both shoot the same bullets, have 30 round mags and are just as easily accessible. Show them a picture of the two rifles and even ask why the more "reasonable ones" believe the AR-15 is bad and the Ruger mini-14 should be allowed. They clearly don't even understand why the fuck they are even there, the logical conclusion is someone they trusted told them to be there or they just trusted some someone running for political office this was important somehow and then they failed to think independently to even research the numbers. Google "mike Nifong" for a great example of man morally bankrupt public official whipping his voters into a frenzy and I do mean a frenzy just to further his career at the cost of framing innocent lives.
E: Intelligent educated people who learned to survive and thrive in the modern world rather than whining all day on the internet about how if only society was a true meritocratic ancap dystopia they'd be kings.
 
Ah yes, that's why right-wingers won't shut up about the price of their groceries while fiscally clever left-wingers have no problems surviving

One second “the left” is a bunch of rich costal elites, the next they’re a bunch of basement dwelling poor people. So interesting how retarded this nonsense is.
Come back to me when left wingers learn the value conservation principle. It's one of the most basic principles of economics (practically all of science) at this point yet they still don't understand that value of currency decreases when supply of currency increases. At that point, I'll consider them economically literate but just barely.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: WelperHelper99
I was going to make a dick joke but I see you guys have already cracked a few.
 
E: Intelligent educated people who learned to survive and thrive in the modern world rather than whining all day on the internet about how if only society was a true meritocratic ancap dystopia they'd be kings.

You literally had no actual rebuttal for any of personalities I described, let alone the objective facts you were obviously were not aware of, did you?

You going to tell me you knew all along about Al Sharpton aspiring to be a drug lord? Ben Crump conspiring to commit perjury with Florida District attorney and the family of the deceased who illegally owned a firearm? Jesus. Fucking. christ. I need you you be 100% honest here: did you even know who these people are? You asking us to trust "intelligent educated people" Did you even know they existed?
 
I have to point out that the US/ first world "left" is very different from other countries'. I for one hate troons, degenerates and black supremacists. So I usually don't come out of the lefty closet to these people.
Where I'm from the left questions and cares about the topics of public and private property. Is education a right? Should it be free and accesible for all? Should we redistribute the wealth? Questioning capitalism is the core of the left, although that doesn't seem to be the case everywhere and that was a culture shock for me.
In the US these so called "leftists" are just privileged, sheltered, soythems that will call you a bigot for saying being a woman is not a feeling. Rise up, my fellow terfs!
 
I would say I lean left. (not the skinwalking lunatic thing we have in occident now)
Like @Mound Dweller I believe in the power of change, simply because stability is a wishfull illusion. Or as the queen of heart says to Alice: we must run as fast as we can, just to stay in place. And if you wish to go anywhere you must run twice as fast as that.
But I realize that we can't move forward without solid ground to walk on, and the left tend to forget very quickly from our past errors. Yet the right is often too rigid itself to be malleable enough. Centrism is no good because both at the same time can't work; they will try to nullify each other and thus won't be productive enough to solve problems to the core.
It might be more effective to treat these two parties as interchangeable tools to improve civilization as needed in time.
For example:
Priority need to strengthen your borders and consolidate your economy -> right
Priority need to improve the efficiency and resilience of your people -> left
A war is coming -> right
A technological and scientific leap is brewing -> left
What's intersting is how all the problems are linked meaning they're reinforcing each other when taken care of.

It is of course a simple, silly thought exercise. I know it will never work like that, the World of men is to weird and complex. Perhaps binary is a bad idea for the political landscape, I don't know.

On the other hand, what I do know is that being an bleeding asshole doesn't depend on which side you're on.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mound Dweller
Back