Why doesn't Null sue the lying journos?

[AirdropShitposts]

It's debatable if there's any loss of reputation leading to damages either.

This is actually the most important thing here. (It's also why Keffals and others have no case against Null absent Section 230.) We all recognize the "damages" going on but Null hasn't suffered any damages he could remotely claim that would outweigh the costs of the lawsuit. Suing people with no money is stupid, suing people with infinitely more money in hopes of getting them on defamation in the United States is stupid.

The only lawsuit I think any competent lawyer would actually potentially entertain rather than advise against is against Cloudflare. Lying about Kiwi Farms and posting that message to block the website was an extra step that the journalists didn't do. Again the damages would be too small to justify a case for Null to pursue, but if we actually did have a billionaire backer like a bunch of these idiots on Twitter claim it would be worth funding just to get Cloudflare to admit what they did. (I think they would settle for this, not actually fight it.)

 

[derpherp2]

Nobody believes the media unless it reinforces their beliefs anyways. Who gives a shit.

Also suing them doesn't really stop them. The Amber heard and rittenhouse shit is still going strong for example.
The best weapon we have is laughing at the retards constantly spewing such shit.

 

[Pendinelli]

Journalists, being the grandasons of the masons that founded the US, are a protected political class that is basically awarded lying rights by the constitution and constitutional amendments. This hallowed conception of the newspaper that America has pushed onto itself I will never understand and is the only thing I consider dumb relating to the USA's foundation.

 

[Captain Wetbeard]

The journalists are damned near always using qualifiers that most people don't pay attention to, but that give them extra protection under the law. Note how many of these bs stories say "reportedly" or "according to X" or "anonymous sources say", add that its already super fucking hard to sue journos even when they intentionally lie and he has almost no chance of winning. Maybe suing Lucas could work, but what would he even take? In the end Null would just be more broke and have more eyes on him. Our defamation and slander laws are broken, which is why we need to legalize dueling again.

 

[DumbDude42]

in almost all western states, suing the press is extremely difficult. for someone in nulls position it is impossible.

Maybe suing Lucas could work

trying to sue a canadian tranny, who currently resides in ireland, in US court, for questionable behavior that is almost certainly protected by the US first amendment? good fucking luck with that lol

 

[Jewthulhu]

Because it's expensive to get a (good) lawyer, the trials would take their time and it's even not sure if he would win.

Case closed.

This. In a perfect world, this situation is exactly what libel laws were made for. But we don't live in a perfect world.

 

[变性黑鬼]

The journalists are damned near always using qualifiers that most people don't pay attention to, but that give them extra protection under the law. Note how many of these bs stories say "reportedly" or "according to X" or "anonymous sources say",

I don't 100% agree with the lugenpresse narrative here. Journos report what information they have been given. So, they report what Keffals told them, because the only thing Null gave them was "the press are scum." Null considers talking to the press a waste of time, likely because their job is basically to report the facts in a light that the reader already agrees with.

A deep and critical dive into the veracity of the facts as presented by their primary sources is not the daily press' job. That job falls to investigative journalists, and a longer format, like this podcast that is doing a pretty ok job of picking apart the details of this situation.

 

[Dyn]

The only lawsuit I think any competent lawyer would actually potentially entertain rather than advise against is against Cloudflare.

If byuu resurfaces Null could and should sue the fuck out of him.

 

[another idiot]

If you want to sue someone, sue that irish retard child who did most of the shit this site got blamed for.

 

[BootlegPopeye]

It would be difficult to win, but one false claim I've started to see repeated by media outlets is that Tarrant posted his manifesto to kiwi farms, like he was a poster here, as though kf was somehow in part responsible for his massacre. That is 100% baseless and that shows a negligence that borders on malice to not check that.