Why Freedom of Speech should be a human right - One of the few rights as a human I'm willing to die for

[The Last Stand]

I see, so you want to debate only US law.
Well then, I can just as well claim that debating US law is nonsensical and a waste of time because it hinges on some disinterested retard judge put in place by literal pedophiles feeling charitable to you.

If I may, "free speech" has been an ancient Greek ideal, which they defined as "the right to express opinions without government restraint." Free speech is commonly linked with US law since the United States has practically curated the foundation of "freedom of speech." If it makes it easier for you, let's use the Greeks' method of "free speech" to argue:

These, then, were the Greeks’ two concepts of free speech, and what came to seem their natural habitats: isēgoriā, or equality of public speech, which was associated with formal political institutions and democratic deliberation; and parrhēsiā, the license to say anything, even (or especially) if it went against the current, which had its stronghold in the ribald comic theatre of playwrights like Aristophanes.

When they say equality of public speech, that means that if we're in a council, your say would be as equal as my say on whatever. Obviously, it wouldn't be the case in a democracy where the majority would rule or if somebody makes a final say. The license to say anything would account for free expression of whatever you'd believe in, even if it goes against popular opinions.

What happens when someone disagrees with your interpretation of "Biblical morality"? Or uses a different book? Or thinks your version of "order" is just a boot stomping on a human face forever?

That has actually happened before. It wasn't pretty to say the least.

 

[dongykung]

Human rights are retarded. Nobody owes you anything just because you exist.

the government does because thats why it exists why would our leaders not owe us anything, you think your parents dont owe you nothing cause you exist? thats caveman thinking we have evolved to be in societies we have culture and rights now which are needing to be protected

i was waiting for one of you faggots to bring up lolicon.

CSAM isn’t art nor freedom of expression.

its creepy art but its art none the less theres lots of creepy art in history, i dont think drawing pokemon characters or something naked is good, we dont like it but its a freedom of expression

If I may, "free speech" has been an ancient Greek ideal, which they defined as "the right to express opinions without government restraint.

theyre definitions were made before corporations could control us almost like governments so that definition needs to have been updated for modern reality

The license to say anything would account for free expression of whatever you'd believe in, even if it goes against popular opinions.

almost anything i think threats are one of the only exceptions it is obvious but yes

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

we have evolved to be in societies we have culture and rights now which are needing to be protected

"Culture and rights need to be protected" - OK, I'll co-sign that

the government does because thats why it exists why would our leaders not owe us anything

"And the government should be the in charge of doing that"

Honestly it's insane to me how people can choose to not be anarchists
How much more degenerate clown world do they need before they see the error of their ways?

 

[dongykung]

"Culture and rights need to be protected" - OK, I'll co-sign that

ok

"And the government should be the in charge of doing that"
View attachment 7281302

Honestly it's insane to me how people can choose to not be anarchists
How much more degenerate clown world do they need before they see the error of their ways?

then who should be in charge of that?? anarchists change there minds when the cops dont show up to stop the raiders clown world is degenerate but thats not fixed by anarchy

 

[XL xQgg?QcQCaTYDMjqoDnYpG]

then who should be in charge of that?? anarchists change there minds when the cops dont show up to stop the raiders clown world is degenerate but thats not fixed by anarchy

Nobody needs to be "in charge of" everybody else. You're assuming someone must rule.
The protection of rights can be organized like every other legitimate service, namely through voluntary arrangements, competition, and contracts.
When raiders attack, you don't pray for a state, you pay for protection in advance. The same way you insure your house against fire without needing a "Ministry of Fire Extinguishers".
Anarchy doesn't mean "no defense" or "no laws", it means "no monopoly on defense". That's a critical distinction that statists keep missing, a common and lazy error.
The key problem is monopoly, and the state is a monopoly on many things, like violence, law enforcement, the court system, borders, the military, money, education, healthcare in many places... Note how all of these things are getting shittier every single day