Why has there been a big push for Indian land "acknowledgement" lately?

ShahOfIran1979

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 21, 2024
Am I the only one who has noticed that there has been a lot of statements lately about "recognizing the ancestral land of indians here" lately? I had never really heard this movement until relatively recently, and now I see it everywhere. For example, the Democrats most recent platform includes this statement at the very beginning:

"The Democratic National Committee wishes to acknowledge that we gather together to state our values on lands that have been stewarded through many centuries by the ancestors and descendants of Tribal Nations who have been here since time immemorial. We honor the communities native to this continent, and recognize that our country was built on Indigenous homelands. We pay our respects to the millions of Indigenous people throughout history who have protected our lands, waters, and animals. While we meet in Chicago, we also recognize and honor the traditional homelands of the Anishinaabe, also known as the Council of the Three Fires: the Ojibwe, Odawa, and Potawatomi Nations."

Indians have never really been a big part of liberal movements in recent years. They are a puny part of the US population and I don't believe I have ever personally met one in my life. Have you noticed this much lately? And if so, why do you think it is being pushed so hard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TORtlEMUStRaNSUS
Because it's BS way to pretend to care about Native Americans without actual doing anything and being smug about it. For instance the Ojibwe never lived anywhere near Chicago or had any connection to the Chicago area. The Odawa, never lived anywhere near Chicago but least may of had a trade connection with the area. The only person I met in real life that did this, was a rich, smug and stupid girl who knew nothing about native Americans and were shocked they did not live in teepees and there houses are tiny compared to hers.

The democrats should invite a Navajo elder to speak. They love to fuck with people by doing 3-5 hour speeches for smug assholes. Navajo code talker veterans did this also when they suspect someone was not being sincere or anti-American.
 
Last edited:
It's a left-wing shibboleth that doesn't actually require any action on the part of the organizations using it, because Native Americans make up an insignificant portion of the population, are rife with people claiming ancestry they don't have, and lack any real political power.
Constantly acknowledging the legacy of slavery and colonialism and stating how American greatness was built through racism eventually started forcing the Cape Cod-tier shitlibs who enabled that nonsense to tolerate negro chimpouts in their workplace and closer to their neighborhoods.
 
As others have said it's just a virtue signal for the most part. A way of showing off how much you care but without taking any real action. I think I first heard of land acknowledgements being a thing some time during Trump's first term, but I've only ever seen them recently in Canadian and Australian media. Weirdly enough the city of Philadelphia and various institutions within that city do land acknowledgements despite the fact that the land was bought paid for by William Penn himself. The land was never stolen but they still feel the need to do this shit anyways. What I wonder though is what actual Native Americans think of this shit. Do they fall for the pandering or do they see right through it for what it is? True and honest injuns pls respond.
 
Words are cheap and easy, and actually giving things to injuns is problematic.

The US Navy recently apologized to a local native village for shelling them over 100 years ago...

In the end, the tribe refused the apology, saying the whole ceremony held was just hollow words.

They had grand expectations of a huge gift of restitution to mend historic debts.

I'm sorry bud, we don't have a million billion dollars in prizes to offer today.

But would you like another song and dance about how we're so sorry for whipping your ass in battle generations ago?
 
1744528524921.webp
Saar plz acknowledgement of land plz Saaaaar

Because Libtards are constantly trying to one up each other for being more libtarded
It's just self feel good virtue signaling. Notice how they aren't personally giving their homes to a local indian tribe for free if they feel it is stolen?
Words are cheap and easy
All 100% true, however I would like to add that this all fundamentally hinges on what is effectively the currentyear "White Man's Burden" which holds White people and White nations/cultures/societies up to an infinitely higher moral standard than everyone else on the planet and thus rendering only White people as worthy of moral condemnation for historically doing shit everyone else did (i.e. conquest, enslavement, assimilation, settlement)

To quote my own autism on anuddah thread
The mindset of White Man's burden never went away. The idea that the only people all the tens of thousands of years of human history capable of morality and agency and ambition and innovation are white people is still dogma in even the most pozzloaded of college campuses....it simply became self loathing instead of self serving.

Since only whites are considered capable of morality, only whites are evil. Since only whites are capable of agency, only white people's crimes and atrocities are worth mentioning. Since only whites are capable of ambition, only white people's greed and expansion and exploitation is worth condemning. Since only white people innovate, only white people's creations have negative side effects, and even then only when white people use them.

Everyone else in the world, from africa to asia to native americans to australasia have the sum totals of their combined histories and conflicts and empires and advancements boiled in a pot down to some grey aesthetic sludge which is then used to flavour the generic "brown people history" archetype used for every non white society.

You know, the one where everyone was happy and wore beautiful ethnic clothing every day of the year and ate nothing but a feast of delicious ethnic street food four times a day, all conflicts were fun and cool and super badass and nobody really got hurt, all empires were bastions of enlightenment and progress, all slaves were effectively treated like nobility and generously allowed in to these wonderful brown societies and became besties with their owners, there was no filth, no disease, no hunger, no bigotry.....until WHITE people arrived.

If these people had to treat history without these double standards then they would have to either damn non-white people as harshly as they do white people, or stop bitching about white people specifically......and that aint ever going to happen
 
Libtards have to have a pet project.
They've tried being black but that didn't work out for them.
They've tried being tranny supporters but have discovered how poisonous they are.

Now they're trying to be native because shutting the fuck up is never an option for them.
 
Because this is an even better excuse than socialism or eminent domain to roll back US constitutional protections for the prole commoners. Lands are declared sovereign to some extinct tribe and POOF - suddenly all your property and the property of your neighbors fall under the jurisdiction of an unelected drum circle. It's already happened in eastern Oklahoma.

Remember that Democrats were the first to champion representation for black people in America - because they owned black people in America. Leftists do not care about social justice or human rights. They care about wealth, who has it and how to steal it. This is just one of their more lucrative schemes to that end.
 
Last edited:
Because big chief activist needs some more checks your average native American is about 50 50 Republican 5050 Democrat I actually no more conservative indians the wagon burner is not the poo people who are Republicans than Democrats
 
This is just one of Americas biggest mistakes. Not killing all the prairie niggers when they had a chance. They aren't natives. They came over here from Siberia. They crossed a land bridge following herds of animals. They have no "native lands". They are basically squatters and immigrants themselves.
 
Indians have never really been a big part of liberal movements in recent years
Shitlibs will gladly accept them into the Spiteful Mutant army, but they're not the target audience.

That would be disgruntled blacktivists, for whom "land acknowledgements" and "anti-colonialism" are just more fuel for their anti-White hatred (hence the Floyd-era creation of "BIPOC", combining two unrelated elements of the Coalition of the Fringes), and Prog wine aunts, whose suicidal empathy is kept going by endless tales of muh'pression.
 
Nothing new. They did this in the 2010s, too. It's most likely not a genuine belief held and it's for jerking themselves off.
 
It's yet another humiliation ritual which faggy Third Worldist neomarxists insist on inflicting as part of their autogenocidal crusade against the 'ontologically evil' 'settler-colonialist' societies of the West. For the logical endpoint of this bullshit, look no further than 1970s Japan, which had to deal with these absolute niggers (in their case the hyper-idealized natives were the Ainu/Jomon, and the terribad settler-colonialists were the Yamato/early Japanese) before it was cool. Fortunately for them though, said niggers self-destructed before they were given the keys to power and thus, the ability to take the rest of Japan down with them (while there are still absolutely ongoing efforts to faggify & destroy the Japanese nation in order to way for infinity brown migrants, they tend to be imposed from the top down by outside NGOs and satraps like Rahm Emanuel nowadays rather than surviving Anti-Japaneseists who burrowed into the power structure like the Weather Underground in the States).
 
Back