Why is being apolitical now seen as deferring to the opposing side?

I remember in high school I had a friend who always talked about politics with me despite me having a pretty personal rule about not talking about religion, sex, or politics in a group of people. I didn’t mind everyone discussing their ideas or what they believed in, as long as it was only that—discussion...but she would always attempt to debate anyone with a different set of ideas than her.
Before we could even legally vote, she was railing on about Bush on a carpool ride home (she drove me and a couple of friends home because we lived close by), and I suggested that maybe she should turn NPR off while she was driving if it was going to make her this heated. I mostly just didn’t care, and knew this was her trying to bait for a fight. When I told her—again—that I didn’t like talking about politics in mixed company, she smugly turned to me and said, “sounds like something a Republican would say.”

I calmly reached over and turned off the radio, and then turned to her and unleashed a barrage of estrogen-laden fury at her. The main points of the verbal assassination were: “I’m not a Republican or a Democrat because as far as I can tell both sides are retarded, with every Dem I know being the worst offender of the two,” “I don’t think it’s worth discussing because we’re 16 and can’t vote,” “you don’t want to talk you want to fight because you have this need to feel right even though all your talking points are “fuck Bush,” “Republicans bad,” and “you’re wrong and dumb for thinking that,”” and finally “I don’t need to pretend to be interested in politics to try and convince people I’m smart because I know neither of us could find Afghanistan on a fucking map and don’t know shit about the economy.”

She cried and it was never brought up again.

Years later, everyone I know that was faking being an intellectual is still faking at being an intellectual and tries to make everything political. Regardless of where they sat on the political spectrum, they grew into narrow-minded consumers who only found joy when they were being told what to do and how to think.

These people hate anyone“apolitical” because it implies that there is more to life than elevating your blood pressure to politics. Being political is what makes them
feel like a person with an identity. But what they lack is a sense of self, a personality, a hobby, a passion, and the ability to find joy in their own way without the TV, radio, or their phone telling them. They were all emotionally stunted in some way (a lot of them had dysfunctional households), and they never faced their own inner conflict because they were too insecure in their own thoughts to even begin questioning the dysfunction.

In short, being apolitical is seen as a threat to an insecure person’s worldview and identity. It forces them to question how someone can be confident, happy, funny, smart, free-thinking, or even a person if they aren’t living a life drenched in politics. What’s scarier than realizing: if everything isn’t political and there is more to life than politics, then what am I doing with my life?
 
Being apolitical is yielding to the most powerful side on a given issue. Don't care? Don't have an opinion? You'll be overpowered by someone who does. It's just how the world works. You need to be at peace with that if you're gonna be Switzerland on XYZ issue. "Who cares" is only valid if everyone on every side agrees not to care anymore, which almost never happens on anything of any importance.

If you don't care, don't care. You are entitled to it. But don't bitch when the people who do care end up making the decisions and you're left out.
 
Last edited:
Being apolitical is yielding to the most powerful side on a given issue. Don't care? Don't have an opinion? You'll be overpowered by someone who does. It's just how the world works. You need to be at peace with that if you're gonna be Switzerland on XYZ issue. "Who cares" is only valid if everyone on every side agrees not to care anymore, which almost never happens on anything of any importance.

You don't need to care about everything or anything that deals with politics. This post is a prime example of what others have already said, where the aim is to guilt people into picking a side. Those who are apolitical already understand what they are relinquishing, and are content with the results, so it's obvious the idea of not being so wrapped up in "the game" is foreign to you.
 
Those who are apolitical already understand what they are relinquishing, and are content with the results, so it's obvious the idea of not being so wrapped up in "the game" is foreign to you.

That's exactly my point...so apolitical people must understand they can't bitch when their lack of giving a shit has unforeseen consequences.

For example, my mom calls herself neutral on gay marriage, but is horrified by tranny stuff. But didn't conservatives enabling one lead to the other by surrendering in the culture war and ceding that territory to radical LGBTs who it turns out don't just wanna be left alone like she thought? By dropping the issue, she and her generation left it to be picked up and won by deranged radicals.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: Syaoran Li
That's exactly my point...so apolitical people must understand they can't bitch when their lack of giving a shit has unforeseen consequences.

This is a hypothetical I don't think I've ever seen, but always hear mentioned. Apolitical people are defined by not caring about the consequences or effects lol The people who bitch and moan are the extremists and emotionally entangled people who are on the losing side, so I have no clue how that's actually applicable. People with a "who cares" attitude just laugh at the stupidity
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Syaoran Li
This is a hypothetical I don't think I've ever seen, but always hear mentioned. Apolitical people are defined by not caring about the consequences or effects lol The people who bitch and moan are the extremists and emotionally entangled people who are on the losing side, so I have no clue how that's actually applicable. People with a "who cares" attitude just laugh at the stupidity

If you're a branch dontgiveashittarian and genuinely don't care about what happens to the society you live in, well...more power to you, but I'd be surprised if you wouldn't be affected by it eventually.

Out of curiousity, what is an issue you have a "who cares" attitude about?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Syaoran Li
Being apolitical is yielding to the most powerful side on a given issue. Don't care? Don't have an opinion? You'll be overpowered by someone who does. It's just how the world works. You need to be at peace with that if you're gonna be Switzerland on XYZ issue. "Who cares" is only valid if everyone on every side agrees not to care anymore, which almost never happens on anything of any importance.

If you don't care, don't care. You are entitled to it. But don't bitch when the people who do care end up making the decisions and you're left out.

I think the issue of being apolitical and “not caring about politics” is often misconstrued as assuming the person who “doesn’t care” really does not care about anything going on in their country. If that’s what you are assuming, then I’d like to offer an alternative idea: what if it simply means they don't heavily fixate on the culture war between the two loudest sides, and instead of “picking a side” they instead pick the candidate that best matches their own ideals? Picking a side means aligning themselves with ideas they may not support, and blindly pulling the lever for someone who might make policies they don’t like.

source: registered to vote in 2008, have voted all over the political scale based on what each candidate offered
 
Back