Why is being black considered a part of LGBTQ?

Ozul

Mogged by "sushi time"
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 13, 2014
It's gay marketing month, and it seems like half the corporate shills sneak a BLM fist into their pride propaganda.
21-06-21-17-02-19-585_deco.jpgScreenshot_20210621-170756~2.pngScreenshot_20210621-170858~2.png

I get that "muh oppression" is a common trait they both like to boast, but why is being black being lumped in with a sexuality movement, especially when gayness is least accepted in the black community?
 
They don't have to sneak it in. This flag that they are all using now has brown and black stripes for browns and blacks
View attachment 2283407
That flag legit looks like some foreign entity is invading the LGBT nation.
They took over the Western regions and they're moving East, devouring the rainbow more and more.
 
Something something "muh intersectionality"

There's an attempt to create a strong coalition of everyone that isn't a "straight, white male" in opposition towards the straight, white men.

You gotta love how fascist that fist logo is though, it's a threat of violence, plain and simple, that want to hurt us.

Isn't that fist also used for womanism? The black equivalent to feminism?

They added the black and brown stripes for "muh intersectionality". But being black/brown is not a sexual orientation. So it makes no sense.

It totally is unite and fight the straight while male.

But when homosex is outlawed in many African countries and can result in jail or death and the American black community isn't too stoked about it either... Well, it's whitey's fault. Don't blame your own cultures here and abroad. Blame the white man, as always.

They keep perpetuating that Stonewall myth and conveniently failing to mention that many murdered tranny POCs would still be alive if they didn't live lives rife with drugs and prostitution. Less time blaming whitey and more time devoted to outreach programs would probably make more strides.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: args and Ozul
Back