Why is it considered bad to teach schoolkids about LGBT issues but people have no problem with religious indoctrination?

When I was a kid at school, it was considered sexual abuse to expose children to open sexuality gay or straight or anything. If you insisted on teaching kids about sexuality you’d have been arrested. You’d have been utterly demonised for it. Sex Ed was a comprehensive by very dry biological take on reproduction and contraception and periods. Section 28 was put in while I was at school because people were trying this stuff on and it was seen as beyond the pale.

Exposing kids too young to sexual stuff is sexual abuse.
There’s no ‘one or the other is Ok’ here. People have different opinions on religion, but a carol concert at Christmas time and a lukewarm prayer to be good to each other once a day is not even vaguely similar to teaching young children about adult sexuality.

EVERYONE who wants to teach kids about sex is a pedo or pedo enabler. Every single one. The lgbtqP lot, with their insistence on teaching kids about how to have sex in degenerate ways, are all pedophile adjacent, and they should all be yeeted into the nearest volcano
 
Let's clarify that when you say "religious indoctrination", you mean "Christian", because no-one ever means "Islam" or "Hinduism" or any other religion when they make mealymouthed complaints against Religion In Schools.
Anyway, the difference is that Christianity very clearly teaches that molesting children is wrong, whereas the entire Rainbow Alphabet movement is specifically dedicated to sexualising and Grooming kids, with the aim of pedophilia being legalised. Anyone who says otherwise is either wilfully blind or lying, and usually the latter.
 
This is one difference from LGBT education. They aren't telling the students they are gay and to take part in sexual gay acts are they?? No, students are just learning about it.
Children do not need to "learn about" this stuff. Ever. Only pedophiles and pedophile enablers think they do. So which one are you?
 
Children do not need to "learn about" this stuff. Ever. Only pedophiles and pedophile enablers think they do. So which one are you?

>If you don't think like I do, you are a pedophile
>Everyone wants to beat on pedophiles (rightly)

Thank you for proving my theory about the innate call to violence correct.

Bear in mind there is a reverse spin on this. Japan a while ago banned Christians teaching children about Hell, because why does a child need to exposed to torture fantasies?

I'm sure you'd agree there is a difference between a clinical description of Hell and a Tertullian-esque jerk off session about how wonderful the suffering of heretics is, so why isn't there one between a sex manual and "Some girls have wives not husbands?"
 
Say what you will about religious belief but it typically gives people a good moral framework, couple that with the suicide stats of atheists compared to those who hold religious beliefs I think you can infer what's an overall fundamental good, at least depending on the system of belief (sorry Muslims, pedo's aren't prophets).
You're basically saying "religion is good except for the ones I don't like or don't support my reasoning". though. Islam and Hinduism are both terrible but have enormous numbers of followers and influence where they exist.

Putting religion in the hands of the state is a recipe for disaster in any case.
 
EVERYONE who wants to teach kids about sex is a pedo or pedo enabler. Every single one. The lgbtqP lot, with their insistence on teaching kids about how to have sex in degenerate ways, are all pedophile adjacent, and they should all be yeeted into the nearest volcano
Children do not need to "learn about" this stuff. Ever. Only pedophiles and pedophile enablers think they do. So which one are you?
The only benefit I could see in teaching this stuff would be helping children identify rape/sexual assault. But there's still no real reason to teach them about sex. This could easily be introduced as a more abstract concept about respecting the consent of other people without explicitly explaining sex. Teach kids how to set physical boundaries and to go to a person of authority if they feel those boundaries are not being respected. But let's be real, the people who want to teach kids about sex don't want them to identify it as rape/sexual assault. They want them to be comfortable with it and open to experimentation.
 
I have no problem at all with Religious Education or learning about religion. It's primary schools in Britain that automatically assume every pupil is a Christian and requires them to practice Christianity at school including pray.
You or your parents moved to a Christian country; you are expected to show a modicum of respect for their religious beliefs, just like you wouldn't eat a burger in India or go without your head covered as a woman in Iran or shoot an eagle on a native reserve.

Christianity, being the only religion where you are saved through Faith alone (yes, I am aware of James 2:14, my theology bros, but this is still the only religion where salvation is given rather than earned), has less overt, more personal practicers than other religions, and because Western Civilization and its high trust societies were built by people practicing the tenets of Christianity, a Christian practicing their faith through their works may simply appear polite or kind or generous or moral by Western standards.

This has, perhaps, given the impression that Christianity is less prevalent in society than it is. Understand that *you* are the odd one out, and if you don't like it, you should go back to wherever you came from -- the same advice I'd give a Christian in Saudi Arabia.

If you'd like to stay and enjoy the fruits of a Christian society -- show some respect and say your prayers, faggot.
 
That came after the service when Father Brown invited you back to the Presbytery or to join the Parish scout group.

Found AR's sock. Stop cutting your legs, freak.

Putting religion in the hands of the state is a recipe for disaster in any case.

You shouldn't ever be teaching 8-year-olds about anal sex and blow jobs, whether in a private or public institution. It's sexual abuse.
 
Found AR's sock. Stop cutting your legs, freak.



You shouldn't ever be teaching 8-year-olds about anal sex and blow jobs, whether in a private or public institution. It's sexual abuse.
No idea what you're blabbering about but whatever boo

Can we establish then. You're talking about butt sex. From what I can see in this thread most of us not super enthused about Jesus are talking more about "Some women have a wife not a husband" level. Is that still pedophilia?

There are kids in school right now who do have two same sex parents, and children like it or not have a chance of encountering them just as they're going to encounter believers in other religions who do things like widow burning you're probably not so enthused about too.
 
People, boomers mainly, throw a fit anytime they hear kids learn about anything remotely related to LGBT matters.
Because it always ends leading to this shit.
kill-it-with-fire-png.6386572

Saorsa-Amatheia Tweedale, a trans woman who works for the DWP, has previously come under fire for saying that trans children's demands for puberty blockers should take precedence over their 'parents' will'.

The civil servant, who co-chairs the Civil Service LGBT+ network, has also been criticised for linking women's rights groups to the far-Right and suggesting they are calling for trans genocide
Seriously wtf is wrong with you people? A man can say he thinks Christianity is outdated among liberal circles and face little opposition, but if he so much as say the guy above is a disgusting creep he suddenly becomes person non grata. And women who pushback on all this are treated even worse. What's up with that?
 
Last edited:
From what I can see in this thread most of us not super enthused about Jesus are talking more about "Some women have a wife not a husband" level. Is that still pedophilia?
Yes it is. You're exposing children to a mind virus two mentally ill people decided was "normal" based on specious thinking and coping mechanisms for past trauma, not actual natural behaviors of human beings. Nevermind the fact that "gay marriage" is a sham, but why do they have to know this? Why does Sally and Sarah have to push their degenerate behavior on my child that I am trying to raise right?
There are kids in school right now who do have two same sex parents, and children like it or not have a chance of encountering them just as they're going to encounter believers in other religions who do thinks like widow burning you're probably not so enthused about too.
And? Some kids have parents that are cheating on each other, abusing one another and doing things that healthy normal people don't do. That does not mean you should pretend it's normal in the slightest. Frankly, I think faggotry is a vice best kept private for the sake of a sane society. I can't control who you want to do the ugly with behind closed doors, but by no means should any sexual behavior be pushed onto kids, especially aberrant ones. The reason why society is so fucked today is that people are more concerned about airing their weird kinks out in public as a replacement for a personality rather than being concerned for the welfare of children. The entirety of the LGBT movement is complicit in the grooming of children into their ranks and frankly no sane parent would allow a known homosexual or transsexual anywhere near their kids.

Leave them alone and let them be fucking kids, you pedophiles.
 
There are kids in school right now who do have two same sex parents

This is biologically impossible.

From what I can see in this thread most of us not super enthused about Jesus are talking more about "Some women have a wife not a husband" level.

Why does not believing in God make you obsessed with teaching little kids about lesbians? I don't see the connection.

The problem with your stupid argument is it's 2024. In 2010, you might have credibly claimed that there is no slippery slope, and that "some kids moms live with other women, and so we have to have a whole class in school to teach third graders about homosexuals" (an argument that is just as applicable to kids whose parents are bigamists, swingers, prostitutes, etc) how normal and natural in this doesn't lead directly to pornographic books in the children's section, but in 2024, we know that it does lead directly there.

Fags want to teach kids about buttsex, and the leverage they use is claiming that it's somehow critically necessary to teach them about "sexual identities" in the first place. Guess what, it's not.
 
Last edited:
Would you rather have:
* Creationism theory or gender theory
* People sperging cause you called God not real or jesus not real
* Satan panic/trans genocide panic
* People grooming kids to be eggs/chorus boys
* People conning for their chirch/lgbt charities
* People calling you heretic/terf
* People offended cause you said their Bible/gdnder theory book is invalid
* People taking hrt/bleach to cure autism

Hitler and Trayvon Martin both breathed oxygen...

Literally two sides of the same coin
 
Back