Why is it considered bad to teach schoolkids about LGBT issues but people have no problem with religious indoctrination?

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

A man can't give birth and feel the same connection a woman does to her chikd

It's always trad fags who keep repeating that fathers can't feel the same love as mothers do for their children. The worst combination of late 20th century retardation and medieval larping.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

It's always trad fags who keep repeating that fathers can't feel the same love as mothers do for their children. The worst combination of late 20th century retardation and medieval larping.

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

It's always trad fags who keep repeating that fathers can't feel the same love as mothers do for their children. The worst combination of late 20th century retardation and medieval larping.

I know, it's weird right?

For a religion that in the modern era styles itself as the last bastion of "Healthy Family Values", they seem to always presume Dads are distant, vaugely authoritarian bureaucrats whose prime directive is to keep an obident wife in the kitchen and their kids submissive. Not actual people capable of affection.

 

[The Punished Mitch]

It's always trad fags who keep repeating that fathers can't feel the same love as mothers do for their children. The worst combination of late 20th century retardation and medieval larping.

They can't feel the same love, because men aren't women and women aren't men. Children require both paternal and maternal love, affection and guidance to thrive optimally. And no, a butch lesbian cannot provide masculine, paternal guidance any more than an effeminate sissy faggot can replace the parenting qualities unique to a mother.

I know, it's weird right?

For a religion that in the modern era styles itself as the last bastion of "Familt Values", they seem to always presume Dad's are distant, vaugely authoritarian bureaucrats whose prime directive is to keep an obident wife in the kitchen and their kids submissive. Not actual people capable of affection.

A mother that nurses your scraped knee and a father that tells you to get back up and try again both have deep, profound affection for you but they're not the same. One is not superior or lesser than the other, but they are different and children require both.

 

[Geddy Lee's Fee and See]

It's always trad fags who keep repeating that fathers can't feel the same love as mothers do for their children.

I never said they can't love their child to the same degree, but it's fucking retarded to think that women don't feel more connected to their children then most men do. It's literally something on a biological level that tells a woman's brain that this creature I brought in the world is mine to protect. It's not a tradfag thing; it's a basic ass evolutionary adaptation. Unless you're going to deny biological reality, it's a fact that women very close to their children, often moreso than the fathers. Otherwise, you'd see more deadbeat moms than fathers.

I know, it's weird right?

For a religion that in the modern era styles itself as the last bastion of "Familt Values", they seem to always presume Dad's are distant, vaugely authoritarian bureaucrats and not actual people capable of affection.

Please point to the part where I said that in my entire long ass rant. Unless you're as intellectually dishonest as you are intellectually dull, you'd realize I said nothing of the sort. In fact, I said almost the exact opposite by saying the father should show love to his children and provide for them.

I know you're a typical, retarded godless heathen but at least try to actually attack all the points I made instead of being a snarky, lying, idiotic whore.

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

View attachment 6387741

That's an FTM, retard. But sure, look at how beautiful maternal love is.

Source and archive for the picture.

 

[Imperial Citizen]

Right, so why would you want to introduce the concept of faggotry into the minds of children? Not just introduce it but normalize it.

For one, homosexuality exists. It’s unclear if it is a genetic condition, an environmental factor, or a combination of the two, but it exists. We are stuck with people that are not heterosexual.

Second, my respect for personal freedoms means that I don’t care what consenting adults do in privacy with each other. Or I should say, it’s not my problem. I have other things to worry about as long as they keep it private.

So when it comes to informing children about the concept of homosexuality, I think it is best to acknowledge its existence. That some people have a partner of the same sex and leave it at that. If a child asks how two homosexuals have a child, answer with adoption. If they are older (teenager), bring up surrogacy or sperm donation. Homosexuals exist, I don’t see their sexuality as a threat, and so it is best to instill a value of recognition to ensure that we all live our own lives in peace.

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

They can't feel the same love, because men aren't women and women aren't men. Children require both paternal and maternal love, affection and guidance to thrive optimally. And no, a butch lesbian cannot provide masculine, paternal guidance any more than an effeminate sissy faggot can replace the parenting qualities unique to a mother.

Please explain then why the children of same sex parents go on to greater success than those raised by heterosexual ones

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122420957249

Just like the Holy Office long ago, you might wish and pray really hard that the sun orbits the earth but....It doesn't.

Two people who jump through loads of hoops to become parents and work really hard to finesse the ability to be good parents are always going to be a safer bet than trailer trash who pop one by accident.

There are differences between men and women, distinct ones. But you hyperfixate on one to the detriment of all the others. Especially, those that they have in common.

 

[Absolutego]

I know, it's weird right?

For a religion that in the modern era styles itself as the last bastion of "Healthy Family Values", they seem to always presume Dads are distant, vaugely authoritarian bureaucrats whose prime directive is to keep an obident wife in the kitchen and their kids submissive. Not actual people capable of affection.

I swear people who write shit like this unironically have never met a Christian who wasn't a televangelist

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

That's an FTM, retard. But sure, look at how beautiful maternal love is.

Source: https://people.com/health/transgender-man-navigates-fatherhood-after-giving-birth-to-baby-boy/#:~:text=So five years ago, Hempel,a son in the spring.

FYI, don't argue with these dumbass libertines. They're stupid, you cannot argue with stupid without being pulled down to their level and get fucked by inexperience.
But you can have a good laugh at their expense.

 

[Beautiful Border]

A few things:

1. A lot of the discourse about this is coming from America. School-mandated prayer or hymns isn't allowed there because of the separation of church and state, so framing it as a hypocrisy issue in that context doesn't make sense.

2. There's the question of what we actually mean by "teaching kids about LGBT issues". Teaching kids that some people are gay is one thing. But there have been leaks of material intended for public schools and some of it is frankly batshit, seemingly designed specifically to confuse kids about their gender.

3. Christianity is a cultural touchstone of the west. Even most atheists will celebrate Christmas or Easter in some form. It's an implicit, underpinning thread of our culture in a way that LGBT rights is not.

 

[Geddy Lee's Fee and See]

That's an FTM, retard. But sure, look at how beautiful maternal love is.

Source: https://people.com/health/transgender-man-navigates-fatherhood-after-giving-birth-to-baby-boy/#:~:text=So five years ago, Hempel,a son in the spring.

Feeding your child HRT chemicals is not a form of love.

Please explain then why the children of same sex parents go on to greater success than those raised by heterosexual ones

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122420957249

Always affirm the reality. Never affirm the fantasy.

Because gay people are more likely to be higher income, hence their children are more likely to suceed in general because they can buy the mentors or whatever to make their child succeed. It's also how they have the money to bribe poor third world women to have their kids or do IVF shit. Plus, all heterosexual couples include successful ones, divorced ones and ones that are basically ghetto/white/whatever trash that have multiple baby mommas and daddies (the latter of which are more often than not failures) which is ALL over the socio-economic chart really. It's the natural default so this is to be expected. There's much more of a spread when it comes to this sort of data rather than the relatively sparse data for homosexuals. Correlation != causation retard. There are factors at play that cause the success but only tangentially related to their parents marital status.

A better test would have controlled for all of this and tested for something like the social competency of gay couples as compared to their economically and otherwise socially equivalent heterosexual ones. But most social science papers are literal trash. not even worth the paper they were written on nowadays.

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

Because gay people are more likely to be higher income, hence their children are more likely to suceed in general. Plus, all heterosexual couples include successful ones, divorced ones and ones that are basically ghetto/white/whatever trash that have multiple baby mommas and daddies (the latter of which are more often than not failures). Correlation != causation retard. There are factors at play that cause the success but only tangentially related to their parents marital status.

There we go. Thank you. So having a same sex parent doesn't preclude you from having a well adjusted, successful life. If anything, they tend to actually be fairly well positioned. It might not be as big an advantage as if your parent was Jeff Bezos, but it certainly doesn't hurt.

We can also agree then that there are many faults in heterosexual couples, but despite all the problems they have that does not mean that all hetrosexuals are evil degenerates who by virtue of having them in their care are commiting child abuse.

You may consider it child abuse. As you are free to believe in a flat earth, the divinity of Roman Emperor or that Diana Spencer's death was a total accident (huh huh snickersnort)

It doesn't make it reality, and it's not fair to teach people things that do not align with reality.

 

[The Punished Mitch]

For one, homosexuality exists. It’s unclear if it is a genetic condition, an environmental factor, or a combination of the two, but it exists. We are stuck with people that are not heterosexual.

Second, my respect for personal freedoms means that I don’t care what consenting adults do in privacy with each other. Or I should say, it’s not my problem. I have other things to worry about as long as they keep it private.

So when it comes to informing children about the concept of homosexuality, I think it is best to acknowledge its existence. That some people have a partner of the same sex and leave it at that. If a child asks how two homosexuals have a child, answer with adoption. If they are older (teenager), bring up surrogacy or sperm donation. Homosexuals exist, I don’t see their sexuality as a threat, and so it is best to instill a value of recognition to ensure that we all live our own lives in peace.

So do BDSM enthusiasts, serial killers and coprophiliacs. Why stop at faggots when exposing children to the realities of sexual deviants existing?

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

There we go. Thank you. So having a same sex parent doesn't preclude you from having a well adjusted, successful life. If anything, they tend to actually be fairly well positioned. It might not be as big an advantage as if your parent was Jeff Bezos, but it certainly doesn't hurt.

We can also agree then that there are many faults in heterosexual couples, but despite all the problems they have that does not mean that all hetrosexuals are evil degenerates who by virtue of having them in their care are commiting child abuse.

Bitch nigger, Read your own bullshit study. The margin is far too low to judge shit.
Your faggot PhDs probably scrubbed the numbers and compared a bunch of rich snots with parental grant investment money to some fucking illiterate kids from the Congo lol

 

[YHWH's Strongest Soldier]

View attachment 6387756

FYI, don't argue with these dumbass libertines. They're stupid, you cannot argue with stupid without being pulled down to their level and get fucked by inexperience.
But you can have a good laugh at their expense.

Feeding your child HRT chemicals is not a form of love.

What are you two trying to prove? Both pictures are of natal, mentally-ill women. If that's your example of a mother's mystical and unique type of love, you're fucking degenerates and tranny supporters.

 

[Geddy Lee's Fee and See]

There we go. Thank you. So having a same sex parent doesn't preclude you from having a well adjusted, successful life. If anything, they tend to actually be fairly well positioned. It might not be as big an advantage as if your parent was Jeff Bezos, but it certainly doesn't hurt.

This is the most pitiful cope I have ever seen. I'm saying the data is not only useless because it's so very obviously rigged to give the right opinion when there are myriads more poor wiggers and niggers from bad environments (and kids for heterosexual broken homes) than there are gay couples with kids by many orders of magnitude. It's something any self-respecting scientist wouldn't even publish because the conclusion is based on intentionally faulty experimentation.

What are you two trying to prove? Both pictures are of natal, mentally-ill women. If that's your example of a mother's mystical and unique type of love, you're fucking degenerates and tranny supporters.

Just like men can be bad fathers, women can be bad mothers. I don't know why this is so hard to understand. There are good and bad parents out there of both sexes, but you are never going to have two good parents of the same sex. It's a fundamental fact about human interactions that only the autistic and westoidiest of westoids don't understand.

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

Bitch nigger, Read your own bullshit study. The margin is far too low to judge shit.
Your faggot PhDs probably scrubbed the numbers and compared a bunch of rich snots with parental grant investment money to some fucking illiterate kids from the Congo lol

That's not the claim that was put forward though.

I was told that all same sex parenting was child abuse in this thread. That they go on to be denied affection, and that they're being set up to fail in life.

That, we've now even got one of the claimaints to acknowledge, is a lie. The evidence does not only not support the claim, but openly denies it. A pious one perhaps, designed to support and affirm a higher noble truth, but a lie.

Lies are not good. And we should not teach lies.

Please. Do some research if you disagree. Please share some more on the topic with me. I don't think that Ra/Quetzecotal/Ru Paul is going to torture me forever if I change my mind and agree with you. I'm not obligated to repeat something that denies objective reality.

 

[HyperboreanRightsActivist]

Karen writes suspiciously like PeggieBigCock.

Let's test this theory out

@Karen of Human Resources how do you feel about Sam Hyde?

 

[The Punished Mitch]

Please explain then why the children of same sex parents go on to greater success than those raised by heterosexual ones

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0003122420957249

Just like the Holy Office long ago, you might wish and pray really hard that the sun orbits the earth but....It doesn't.

Two people who jump through loads of hoops to become parents and work really hard to finesse the ability to be good parents are always going to be a safer bet than trailer trash who pop one by accident.

There are differences between men and women, distinct ones. But you hyperfixate on one to the detriment of all the others. Especially, those that they have in common.

You providing a sociology """""""""""""study""""""""""""" showing children who end up with absolute cream of the crop European lesbians manage to do as well as children from natural families with a far wider range of socioeconomic variables isn't the W you think it is.