Why is it considered bad to teach schoolkids about LGBT issues but people have no problem with religious indoctrination?

[Karen of Human Resources]

Let's test this theory out

@Karen of Human Resources how do you feel about Sam Hyde?

I've seen the name on this forum but I've no idea who he was until I just searched and saw he's a comedian apparently?

You providing a sociology """""""""""""study""""""""""""" showing children who end up with absolute cream of the crop European lesbians manage to do as well as children from natural families with a far wider range of socioeconomic variables isn't the W you think it is.

And what did you provide? Personal opinion?

 

[Geddy Lee's Fee and See]

That's not the claim that was put forward though.

I was told that all same sex parenting was child abuse in this thread. That they go on to be denied affection, and that they're being set up to fail in life.

That, we've now even got one of the claimaints to acknowledge, is a lie. The evidence does not only not support the claim, but openly denies it. A pious one perhaps, designed to support and affirm a higher noble truth, but a lie.

Lies are not good. And we should not teach lies.

Please. Do some research if you didagree. Please share some more on the topic with me. I don't think that Ra/Quetecotal/Ru Paul is going to torture me forever if I change my mind and agree with you. I'm not obligated to repeat something that denies objective reality.

Are you at the point where you stop trying to actually trying to pretend like your study doesn't have an objectively shit methodology that doesn't prove anything close to what you are saying? Because that'd be great,assuming you can actually do some research and actually check what your paper is saying and analyze why it's shit instead of posting a random ass paper as evidence. Midwits deserve to be mocked and crucified.

And what did you provide? Personal opinion?

Literal common sense that was known to even the most basic of hunter-gatherers. You don't have to explain common knowledge; you explain why it's wrong and you are fumbling very hard.

 

[HyperboreanRightsActivist]

It's always trad fags who keep repeating that fathers can't feel the same love as mothers do for their children. The worst combination of late 20th century retardation and medieval larping.

To be fair to trads, fathers will never be able to love their kids the same way mothers do, and mothers will never be able to love their kids the same way fathers do.

It's the same amount of love but expressed in different ways

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

What are you two trying to prove? Both pictures are of natal, mentally-ill women. If that's your example of a mother's mystical and unique type of love, you're fucking degenerates and tranny supporters.

Don't get me wrong, there are some really shit parents out there.
But that's not a comparison in an argument of should people who build their whole identity on sucking penis and who are overwhelmingly known for child abuse in their lives raise kids.
Answer is no. You want to be gay, be gay, fuck off. Stay the fuck away from kids.

That's not the claim that was put forward though.

I was told that all same sex parenting was child abuse in this thread. That they go on to be denied affection, and that they're being set up to fail in life.

It is child abuse, yes.

That, we've now even got one of the claimaints to acknowledge, is a lie.

It ain't no lie.
Here's one simple fact about same sex kids and why it's child abuse.
They'll be bullied and shat on by society for their entire lives and nothing will change that. At best, they'll be wise enough to get over that shit, at worst, they'll take the Canadian Health Care route.

The evidence does not only not support the claim, but openly denies it. A pious one perhaps, designed to support and affirm a higher noble truth, but a lie.

There's no evidence to the contrary.
Retard, basic human experience will tell you that gay kids will have a shit life. Their self worth will be destroyed, if not their ass with it. Fags just don't do well in society.

Lies are not good. And we should not teach lies.

lol
What the fuck are you? A liberal arts wine aunt or some shit with a ton of cats or some shit?
Who talks like that?

Please. Do some research if you disagree.

I did. Fag kids have a shit life.
How about you do some research too?

Please share some more on the topic with me. I don't think that Ra/Quetzecotal/Ru Paul is going to torture me forever if I change my mind and agree with you. I'm not obligated to repeat something that denies objective reality.

I'm not obliged to do shit either.
If you honestly believe that fags kids don't have shit lives, more so, they actually do well in life, there;s nothing else to say. You're retarded.

 

[Nero Fiddled]

Personally, I don't think LGBT or religion should be taught in schools.

The LGBT nonsense is made up shit based on nothing but perversion and\or mental health issues and there's no place for it in society, let alone in a school setting.

As for religion, it has been touted as a bastion of morality, yet religion has been used to justify the sickest excesses of mankind for centuries.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

As for religion, it has been touted as a bastion of morality, yet religion has been used to justify the sickest excesses of mankind for centuries.

Get a load of Nero over here.
Let's instead teach (((humanitarian))) values that haven't done any single bit of dmg ever to anyone instead.
Or let's not teach any ethics at all. Let YouTube teach kids as TV taught the boomer+ generation. That worked out just fine.

 

[Trump's Chosen]

So the point is why is being forced into being a Christian and having Christianity being shoved down your throat any better than learning about LGBT matters?

1. If you're being forced into christianity, it isn't christianity, or to avoid a true scotsman at least, not according to christian teaching.
2. The goal of LGBT stuff is orgasms, the goal of christanity is virtue. At least the goal is better for society than the other. Although the other is an easier sell.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

1. If you're being forced into christianity, it isn't christianity, or to avoid a true scotsman at least, not according to christian teaching.
2. The goal of LGBT stuff is orgasms, the goal of christanity is virtue. At least the goal is better for society than the other. Although the other is an easier sell.

3. When's the last time kids bullied other kids for not being Christian enough?

 

[Trump's Chosen]

3. When's the last time kids bullied other kids for not being Christian enough?

The only religious type bullying I've seen is of someone being a christian, rather than what you describe. So as far as I know, pretty much never. But I don't know.

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

To be fair to trads, fathers will never be able to love their kids the same way mothers do, and mothers will never be able to love their kids the same way fathers do.

It's the same amount of love but expressed in different ways

I'll bite. What specific love can a father have that a mother can't and vice versa.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

The only religious type bullying I've seen is of someone being a christian, rather than what you describe. So as far as I know, pretty much never. But I don't know.

What about bullying kids with two dads?

 

[Trump's Chosen]

What about bullying kids with two dads?

I haven't seen it, but it sounds like something that would happen. I just knew a girl that had 2 mothers, and she wasn't bullied for it.

 

[Imperial Citizen]

So do BDSM enthusiasts, serial killers and coprophiliacs. Why stop at faggots when exposing children to the realities of sexual deviants existing?

Two of these are fetishes and one is a crime. Fetishes should be kept private. Criminals should be arrested.

You’re not telling kids about how to eat da poopoo. You’re telling them that some people have a relationship with the same sex and that’s it.

I think the point of division here is that I don’t see homosexuality as sexual deviance. It’s not the norm but I recognize that it appears to be a natural phenomenon and I categorize it as just an abnormality.

Viewing it as sexually deviant, I can absolutely understand why you would not want it brought up at all with children.

 

[CAPTAIN HAPPY]

Two of these are fetishes and one is a crime. Fetishes should be kept private. Criminals should be arrested.

You’re not telling kids about how to eat da poopoo. You’re telling them that some people have a relationship with the same sex and that’s it.

Kids are curious. You think they won't start looking into the lifestyle of homos?

I think the point of division here is that I don’t see homosexuality as sexual deviance.

It's just tearing the fuck out of an asshole until you can't stop liquid sewage.

It’s not the norm but I recognize that it appears to be a natural phenomenon and I categorize it as just an abnormality.

So's eating babies and genociding rival species. But some abnormalities are not equal to others.

Viewing it as sexually deviant, I can absolutely understand why you would not want it brought up at all with children.

Kids will find out, especially these days. It's the impression that they're initially left with that's important.

 

[HyperboreanRightsActivist]

I'll bite. What specific love can a father have that a mother can't and vice versa.

Nothing specific. Men and women's brains are just wired differently. They can act near identical and there would still be slight differences.

My evidence is anecdotal; you can observe it too if you pay attention to how (good) fathers act around kids vs how (good) mothers act. Dads just have a very male style of bonding, and vice versa for mums. It's hard to describe.

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

Nothing specific. Men and women's brains are just wired differently. They can act near identical and there would still be slight differences.

My evidence is anecdotal; you can observe it too if you pay attention to how (good) fathers act around kids vs how (good) mothers act. Dads just have a very male style of bonding, and vice versa for mums. It's hard to describe.

Hmmm, fair enough. Was interpreting your initial comment differently.

 

[Karen of Human Resources]

Nothing specific. Men and women's brains are just wired differently. They can act near identical and there would still be slight differences.

My evidence is anecdotal; you can observe it too if you pay attention to how (good) fathers act around kids vs how (good) mothers act. Dads just have a very male style of bonding, and vice versa for mums. It's hard to describe.

Source: My feelings and imagination

Nobel Prize winning stuff here. It's better than a random bronze age book from goat fuckers, I'll give you that much.

I'm feeling too lazy to quote each individual one, but nobody has actually stepped up to provide any sort of research, method or process to support their thesis beyond "My God doesn't like it" or "Sex is yucky".

Do better. Be disgusted. Cope. Seethe. But be honest that it is just your personal feelings and you've got nothing else in the locker if that is the case.

None of us want our kids being taught how to dilate by trannies. But that is not an automatic pass to let Father back out of the nursing home to touch the youth again and then lie about how they got pregnant.

 

[Geddy Lee's Fee and See]

I'll bite. What specific love can a father have that a mother can't and vice versa.

Mothers (at least the good one) will never see you as anything but the child they raised. Fathers can and do get over you looking and acting like a child (which is why they are typically the ones that teach kids how to integrate into larger society as an adult and when they are adults, treat them as such under typical circumstances), I have seen mothers treat their grown ass sons and daughters like babies (mine included), for better and for worse.

I don't know why people think fathers and mothers love the same way. They don't. Same intenisty yes, but in very different ways.

 

[Da Grim Reaper]

Both are religions. One is new, the other is ancient.

 

[Otterly]

Please explain then why the children of same sex parents go on to greater success than those raised by heterosexual ones

And yet you can find work stating the opposite

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0049089X12000610

Like this.
There are no same sex parents - two people of the same sex can’t have a baby. There are same sex semi adoptive parents.