Why is it considered bad to teach schoolkids about LGBT issues but people have no problem with religious indoctrination?

Do better.
Shamlessly doubleposting, but you should take your own advice if the best you can do is a shitty journal paper from God knows where that doesn't even back what you are saying when you break the data down properly.

Galileo got away with acting like a cunt when he had no evidence because he was right and what he said wasn't socially destabilizing nonsense. You don't have that same level of elegance with your spreadshot, dullard wine aunt defenses of sodomy.
 
Shamlessly doubleposting, but you should take your own advice if the best you can do is a shitty journal paper from God knows where that doesn't even back what you are saying when you break the data down properly.

Galileo got away with acting like a cunt when he had no evidence because he was right and what he said wasn't socially destabilizing nonsense. You don't have that same level of elegance with your spreadshot, dullard wine aunt defenses of sodomy.

This is how bad it is though. I've done one very lazy Google search, and I've still got more than any of you lot.

The burden of proof is on you guys, but I've still gone that step further just to start things off and you....Have nothing.

I've posted something. You dispute the value of it. Fine, post something of value then, I will read it and I'll evaluate it.

The ball is still in your court, and instead of responding you're whining that I did respond.

Prove the claim, step aside, or accept its a lie. Your choice
 
Source: My feelings and imagination
Yes.

Almost as if not every truth is knowable and not every observation can be backed with a scholarly study...

A behavioral/developmental psychologist would tell you the exact same thing: there is no specific set of behaviors universal to every single male or every female, but there are noticeable differences that can only be found through observation. Source: (I made it the fuck up, Sep 2024)
 
And yet you can find work stating the opposite
Like this.
There are no same sex parents - two people of the same sex can’t have a baby. There are same sex semi adoptive parents.

Now it's my turn to doublepost.

Thank you. Someone is stepping up

I'll read this, but unfortunately I do know this guy and you've picked an unfortunate source. His testimony was thrown out of the US Courts not that long ago because he wasn't qualified to comment on these issues, and because of his lack of objectivity.


—In his ruling that Arkansas’s 2021 law banning gender-affirming medical care for minors is unconstitutional, U.S. District Judge James Moody Jr. cited significant problems with the state’s selected experts: “The Court does not credit the testimony of Professor [Mark] Regnerus and gives it no weight because the Court finds that he lacks the qualifications to offer his opinions and failed to support them.”; “Dr. [Patrick] Lappert does not meet the requirements under Daubert to give opinions relevant to this case.”; “Dr. [Paul] Hruz has never treated a patient for gender dysphoria.”

—Published a deeply flawed study that attempted to demonstrate that children of same-sex parents fared worse in comparison to children raised by straight couples—without actually studying the children of same-sex parents. Both progressives and conservatives called the study bogus. A Netherlands data analysis published in 2021 reported that “children in same-sex-parented families outperform children in different-sex-parented families on multiple indicators of academic performance, including standardized tests scores, high school graduation rates, and college enrollment.”

—Published a subsequent “study” targeting pro-LGBTQ Christians that attempted to prove that favoring marriage equality leads to a sexually unrestrained, immoral world. The study was neither peer-reviewed nor did Regnerus provide details on his survey sampling.

—Was rejected as an expert witness in a Michigan marriage equality ruling. Judge Bernard A. Friedman wrote: “The Court finds Regnerus’s testimony entirely unbelievable and not worthy of serious consideration,” and that his conservative research was “hastily concocted at the behest of a third-party funder.”

Not really...Reassuring stuff but, if its the best there is I'll give it a go!
 
The ball is still in your court, and instead of responding you're whining that I did respond.

Prove the claim, step aside, or accept its a lie. Your choice
No it's in your court. I have the sum total of human history and biological reality backing my claim up. You are denying that's true, ergo you have to show why it's untrue, not do lazy Google searches to make half-assed claims not backed by the data. That's how actual reasonable research goes, not the reddit-tier deification of it.
 
Please explain then why the children of same sex parents go on to greater success than those raised by heterosexual ones


Just like the Holy Office long ago, you might wish and pray really hard that the sun orbits the earth but....It doesn't.

Two people who jump through loads of hoops to become parents and work really hard to finesse the ability to be good parents are always going to be a safer bet than trailer trash who pop one by accident.

There are differences between men and women, distinct ones. But you hyperfixate on one to the detriment of all the others. Especially, those that they have in common.


We do not find any heterogeneity by child’s sex, ethnicity, or parental marital status

Considering the study was done in the netherlands and the netherlands counts 3rd generation immigrants as dutch ethnicity, they have not been able to control for ethnicity at all. And considering same sex parents virtually don't exist of the largest immigrant groups, this is essentially another study that shows the disparity of native population vs. immigrant population.
 
i'm not even religious but looking objectively at history it's pretty clear that major religions have had thousands of years of experience at dealing with the human condition and have picked up some tricks on helping societies thrive and maintain themselves

replacing current religions that guide people on how not to ruin their lives with a new religion that speedruns ruining your life and everyone else's life around you isn't a working plan

Source: My feelings and imagination
psychology and sociology are the softest of "sciences" and are propaganda machines at this point (maybe at all points). it's not even worth arguing with your study. trannies are being tricked into mutilating their bodies by adulthood. gays and bisexuals suffer frequently from the most serious kinds of STDs. lesbians are whackjobs that destructively lash out at society because they were molested by a revolving door of pedophiles that their mothers invited into the house

your only motivation for supporting the self-destructive community of LGBT is because of the pussy tingles you get from society praising you for falling for the tricks of tranny jews and regular jews that are pushing this cult on american society. you happily post their propaganda as evidence while they masturbate in a dark room, their little hats bouncing on their head, to the idea of children's genitals being chopped off and men getting their neg holes pozzed
 
Considering the study was done in the netherlands and the netherlands counts 3rd generation immigrants as dutch ethnicity, they have not been able to control for ethnicity at all. And considering same sex parents virtually don't exist of the largest immigrant groups, this is essentially another study that shows the disparity of native population vs. immigrant population.
Shh bro... I've totally been owned and coping and praying because this half-assed journal article proves fags are better parents than normal parents, despite very obvious flaws with even the conception of the article like how could you even measure that in a meaningful way when there are more heterosexual families than gay ones by literal orders of magnitude or the ethnic question you just started right now or even just the fact that gay families are going to tend toward the rich side of things. I'll be going to a Trappist Monastery to rethink my life and what I've been fighting for.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Iron Jaguar
because he wasn't qualified to comment on these issues, and because of his lack of objectivity.
And you quote glaad who are about as non objective as it gets.
He’s never treated a patient with gender dysphoria? Why does he need to? He knows humans can’t change sex and the entire field is butchery built on lies.
Who are the ‘experts’ for trannyism? WPATH? They are allowed to style themselves as experts. Are they? They include pedophiles with castration fetishises so maybe they are experts on trans, but WPATH setting standard of care is like allowing junkies to set opiate dosages or anorexics set calorie guidelines.

Are all same sex parents abusers? As in actively sexually abusing their kids? No I don’t think they are. Are they raising them in an ideology many would consider abusive by its very existence? That’s probably a different question and will be more subjective. Many would say yes. Do gays do child abuse at a vastly higher rate than straights? Yes, they do. Are same sec parent households optimal for child rearing? No I don’t think they are.
Children benefit from a mother and a father. I do agree that on average mother and father input is subtly different. I don’t think men are less capable of loving a child, but they do it differently. A mother and father is optimal. Can children be raised by a different Combo? (aunt, grandparents) and be well raised? Yes for sure, but the optimum is a loving mother and father and an extended family if possible.
 
This is how bad it is though. I've done one very lazy Google search, and I've still got more than any of you lot.
It's a fundamentally flawed question to begin with, because most same-sex couples don't adopt or raise children. Most of them aren't even monogamous. Having a gay "open-relationship" is the default. That's why the whole debate over same-sex marriage was a nonsense distraction issue. Most of them don't want to get married, and the ones that do act the same as unmarried couples anyway.
 
It's a fundamentally flawed question to begin with, because most same-sex couples don't adopt or raise children. Most of them aren't even monogamous. Having a gay "open-relationship" is the default. That's why the whole debate over same-sex marriage was a nonsense distraction issue. Most of them don't want to get married, and the ones that do act the same as unmarried couples anyway.
some time ago i told a woman i knew about Dan Bell, the dead mall guy, and how in a podcast he had talked about him and his husband at the time inviting a latin american boytoy to live with them. of course, both him and his husband would have sex with the boytoy while they were all living together

later on she recounted the story as how "Dan Bell was cheating on his husband" and was confused even after i explained the story again

women seem to be unable to understand how gay men live their lives or how the behavior of the vast majority of gay men directly contributes to the plague levels of STDs in both the gay community and to their beards and their pets and adopted children
 
Someone post the maps of pride rallies and the one of gender clinics from before lgtv+oled education began and the one after it.

Gendershit has unironically become a religion, and a particularly militant one, as if we needed another...
women seem to be unable to understand how gay men live their lives or how the behavior of the vast majority of gay men directly contributes to the plague levels of STDs in both the gay community and to their beards
Pooners in particular not only don't understand this but think their yaoi mangoes is how being gay works.

And the same time many women think talking about STDs is a form of shaming now...
 
3. When's the last time kids bullied other kids for not being Christian enough?
I’ve been bullied for merely wearing a cross back when I was in high school. (Not being a victim here. It didn’t really bother me much) how many Christian’s bully atheists for not being Christian?
Second, my respect for personal freedoms means that I don’t care what consenting adults do in privacy with each other. Or I should say, it’s not my problem. I have other things to worry about as long as they keep it private.
I used to believe the same. Then I realized what the slippery slope was, and why faggots were hated throughout history.
 
For one, homosexuality exists. It’s unclear if it is a genetic condition, an environmental factor, or a combination of the two
Oh, so being molested/Groomed by pedogays is a "genetic condition"?

Second, my respect for personal freedoms means that I don’t care what consenting adults do in privacy with each other. Or I should say, it’s not my problem.
That's the problem. YOU might have a vivre et laisser vivre attitude towards their behaviour but they will never cease trying to obliterate norms and boundaries. It's their very nature to do so. They are compelled to force others to engage in their perversions. - They want to make sure your children end up in Hell with them. Literally.

Lies are not good. And we should not teach lies.
So much irony I've developed haemochromatosis.
 
Back