Why is it considered bad to teach schoolkids about LGBT issues but people have no problem with religious indoctrination?

[Iron Jaguar]

You think so?

Men have been pounding other men's butts and/or dressing as women and calling themselves Shirley for a very long time. Way before Jesus and Mohammad were allegedly around.

There's literally no point in arguing with someone who denies the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.

 

[Joy Depression]

There's literally no point in arguing with someone who denies the historicity of Jesus of Nazareth.

I'm not saying a guy called Jesus "never existed" at the time. Maybe he did and maybe he did like giving talks.

I don't believe in any of the "magic" stuff- the "virgin birth", the miracles, the coming back to life etc.

The crucifixion is also disputed e.g. Jesus is a prophet in Islam too but they don't believe he was crucified.

 

[Chick in Jockey]

I swear people who write shit like this unironically have never met a Christian who wasn't a televangelist

And also the kind of retarded karen anti-vaxxers that homeschools (not even a private religious school) their kids into being socially retarded and that think alternative medicine berry supplement teas, unfiltered/unpasturized cow milk (with puss and blood), and psychedelic mushrooms "for ADHD" are gonna fix shit like their kid's flu and violent seizures from a high fever. "GMOs bad, lysteria infected food and tapeworm pills good".

I can understand being skeptical of the media and how rushed the COVID vaccine seemed (even if the cases of myocarditis are small), I can't understand trusting AI generated Facebook horseshit and also repeating the "vaccines cause autism" horseshit from a dude that wanted to inject his bone marrow into kids while being the same type that thinks bleach cures autism.

The kind of people who say "if you're scared so much, go back to church" as a response to basic survival instincts are almost as crazy as a bipolar person moments away from sticking shotgun shells through their brain. These are the same people that deny climate change and a load of other shit, not because they don't believe it, but because it brings us one step closer to judgement day. Evangelicals are fucking nutcases.

But back on topic, I would rather trust an obnoxious christfag over a pooner groomer, but that ain't saying much.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

Jesus is a prophet in Islam too but they don't believe he was crucified.

No-one cares what Musloids think.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

Men have been pounding other men's butts and/or dressing as women and calling themselves Shirley for a very long time.

Yes, and they've also been committing rape, murder and incest. I guess we'd better teach children all about how to do those things too!

 

[Linako 2.0]

People seethe about Christianity, they usually mean cartoonishly retarded protestant fundamentalists who were all godless hippies trying too hard to compensate for what they did in the 60's - 70's.

 

[TheNoseKnows]

Gays should it be allowed near children. Actually they should not be allowed into the public. I have my issues with religious freaks but fags trying to teach kids are actual pedophiles.

Also....

india is not a real country, hindoodoo religion is trash.

Islam will wipe out the hindodoos. Inshallah.

Thank you come again sar.

 

[Easterling]

I'm not saying a guy called Jesus "never existed" at the time. Maybe he did and maybe he did like giving talks.

I don't believe in any of the "magic" stuff- the "virgin birth", the miracles, the coming back to life etc.

The crucifixion is also disputed e.g. Jesus is a prophet in Islam too but they don't believe he was crucified.

Nigga I bet you believe a man can become a woman so fuck right off

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

 

[Not A Bunny]

Honestly? I have a problem with both, but I have less of a problem with religion.
Religion, ultimately, is philosophical and is about discipline. Self-control. Humility. Community.

The thing that LGBT is right now is focused on the self, and whether or not they like to admit it, it's ultimately about hedonism. Sex feels good, affirmations feel good, even the euphoria bump from hormones (artificial though it is) is well-documented. And hedonism isn't particularly good for the soul. It feeds narcissism and addiction.

It would be one thing if the entire movement were just a lot of people going about their days and there was no "get used to it" about it. What you do in your own bedroom and with whom (as long as it's with consenting adults) should be a reasonable expectation in society. Whatever your personal nittnoids are, most people give not a fuck, with one caveat: that you keep it to your damn self.

But nowadays, the LGBTwhatever movement is about "me". Whatever makes ME feel good. MY truth. MY comfort. MY safety. Oh, and you aren't allowed to question it or contradict it. You're a bigot if you don't trust a child that tells you he's a girl today even though he might tell you he's a firetruck tomorrow.

I think that last thing is what's making people uncomfortable. Religion isn't perfect. It lacks in a lot of ways, actually. But most people's religion doesn't demand converts. It doesn't ask you to pester other people with it (in a practical, and modern sense; yes, I am aware that there are some religions that demand it, but, we hate those for the same reason).

 

[Joy Depression]

Ministers and other church members shouldn't be allowed near children. Actually they should not be allowed into the public.

Fixed

Religion, ultimately, is philosophical and is about discipline. Self-control. Humility. Community.

That's supposedly, but the practicing Christians I know are some of the biggest dicks you will ever meet and all feel entitled to force their views on others.

Even though people in Britain (except for cities in England that have multi-culturism) are all spoon-fed Christianity at school and forced to practice it, they become non-practicing the instant they leave primary school and actually have a choice and many choose for Christianity to not have any part of their lives whatsoever except maybe a few spoken words at weddings/funerals but even that is fading with many opting to have non-religious services.

Plenty of people out there who choose for religion to have no part of their lives whatsoever who somehow turn out to be decent people.

And before anyone mentions Christmas, that wasn't even Christian to begin with (it was Pagan), and it is celebrated by atheists and other religions too. Taking part in Christmas doesn't mean one is Christian.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

People seethe about Christianity, they usually mean cartoonishly retarded protestant fundamentalists who were all godless hippies trying too hard to compensate for what they did in the 60's - 70's.

Keep in mind that OP is almost certainly brown, and 3rd Worlders think everyone in the West is by default a Christian.
The Omani Arabs I spent significant time with were incredibly ignorant about what the average Westerner really believes. Most Muslims spend their entire lives without a real interaction with anyone who is not a Muslim, and they get their ideas of us from whatever they hear in the mosque and whatever subversive garbage the Jews in Hollywood pump out, which gives them a very wrong impression of what most of us actually think and value.

the practicing Christians I know are some of the biggest dicks you will ever meet and all feel entitled to force their views on others.

So no different to atheists or vegans then. Or Indians or Chinese.

 

[Whoopsie Daisy]

Even though people in Britain (except for cities in England that have multi-culturism) are all spoon-fed Christianity at school and forced to practice it

No they're not. Follow the tenets of your fagflag loving trannygod and KYS.

 

[TheNoseKnows]

. Most Muslims spend their entire lives without a real interaction with anyone who is not a Muslim, and they get their ideas of us from whatever they hear in the mosque and whatever subversive garbage the Jews in Hollywood pump out, which gives them a very wrong impression of what most of us actually think and value.

Same as us in the west. We are owned almost completely by the Jews.

OP is a Pajeet. And this entire thread is probably a troll post.

I ate a cow last night. It tasted great. I wonder why pajeets worship cows? Is it because their women look similar?

 

[The Anarki Main]

The difference is that religion is by law, at least in the US, limited to private institutions, where woke politics are not.

You are not forced into religious indoctrination. Your parents enroll you in a religious school because that is what your parents want you to learn about. Private schools are businesses with a strict enrollment criteria. It might be "forced" from the child's perspective but not the parent. It's already established that the parent's job is to pass on their values to their kids so they have good morals before they are old enough to make their own decisions, so this is not necessarily a negative thing.

Public schools are general purpose and intended to serve everyone, with support from the government. Meaning they need to stay neutral and honest. For many children, it is the only option. Teaching a certain radical view in a public school is forced and unethical, and works against the parent.

That's supposedly, but the practicing Christians I know are some of the biggest dicks you will ever meet and all feel entitled to force their views on others.

Really? Most of the devout Christians I know couldn't possibly give less of a shit. They disagree or are disappointed, sure. But the entitled "everyone has to join me" thing is mostly reserved for the obsessive ones that are frowned upon by their own anyway.

 

[The Ugly One]

Children benefit from a mother and a father.

This is another one of those Schroedinger's Moral Principles that is either true or false depending on how I phrase it:

True: Two gay men are just as good at parenting as a woman and a man. In fact, many gay couples are better parents than straight couples!

False: Children don't need mothers; there is no particular value a woman contributes to a child's upbringing, and 100% of what she does can be done by a man. In fact, many men are superior at "mothering" comapred to women.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Christians I know are some of the biggest dicks you will ever meet and all feel entitled to force their views on others.

I don't care if a """Christian""" raped your mother to death in front of your eyes, if you have a problem with the religion itself then make an argument.

 

[Otterly]

This is another one of those Schroedinger's Moral Principles that is either true or false depending on how I phrase it:

True: Two gay men are just as good at parenting as a woman and a man. In fact, many gay couples are better parents than straight couples!

False: Children don't need mothers; there is no particular value a woman contributes to a child's upbringing, and 100% of what she does can be done by a man. In fact, many men are superior at "mothering" than women.

If mothers had no value, we’d have been evolved away (I get what you’re arguing, it’s the phrasing, just saying.) 100% can’t be done by a man. Men can’t gestate, they can’t breastfeed. That’s the ‘absolutely cannot do’ stuff. If the argument is that a single father can a child fine then that’s a matter of degree, so can women, and you’re looking at on average how each group turns out. I think you would expect the single fathers to do better due to factors below

Both of us interact differently with our kids, and we both bring different things to the table. Both are needed. Kids go through phases of preferring one parent as well, maybe there are developmental stages where more of one type of input is needed. I’ve also noticed all ours will run to one parent or the other depending on what’s happened - something that resulted in fear they go to dad, something that requires comfort to mum.
Single fathers are an interesting one because they do have good outcomes AND they are rarer. There are fewer single dads and I’d imagine that since stereotypically it’s the mother who keeps the kids, you’re selecting hard for a group which;
- Excludes deadbeat dad who abandon the family -
-includes loving families with single father through tragedy (wife dies young for example)
-selects for men who step up and do the job.
-selects for men who don’t just install a new wife to do the work
So you end up with a very selected pool.

 

[llllIllIllIIIIllI]

Note how OP (an Indian) waits for the thread to die down a little and then comes back and dumps another Indian word salad with as many random white people culture things that don't make sense to compare, to confuse you all and make you post more and hate each other.

OP got his cover blown in the main India thread and he came here to do this to get more mileage out of his account. Literally everything about this thread is designed to make whites battle each other

 

[GunCar Gary]

Literally everything about this thread is designed to make whites battle each other

1. i already do this because nobody cares what indians have to say

2. if i tried to battle an indian he would get his stale curry stink all over me and would probably try to rape me at some point