Why is it woke for a dude to larp as a chick, but socially unacceptable for a white person to larp as a niggo?

Dom Cruise said:
Of course it's exceptional as shit, it was invented entirely as an excuse to be racist as shit towards white people, it's in fact one of the most telling aspects of SJW ideology and it's pure hatred of white people, because they don't give a shit if anyone appropriates anything from "white culture" (which they claim doesn't even exist) with the only exception being non-white people running into trouble as well when adopting "black culture" but it's origin is pure "fuck whitey" trash.

The reality is that a culture only exists in the first place thanks to cultural appropriation, everything is just humans borrowing and taking influence from something else stretching all the way back to the dawn of human civilization, nothing is made in a vacuum.

Instead SJWs retards seems to think that sombrero wearing, mariachi singing Mexicans going "AY AY AY AY, CANTA Y NO LLORES!" just poofed into existence one day and they themselves weren't taking influence from something.
Click to expand...
It's also (ironically) racist towards non-white people in the sense that those spergs aren't allowing them to share their cultures towards white people (so the latter can understand them better).

Culture-related stuff aren't copyrighted, and whoever thinks otherwise deserves an one-way trip to the sun.
 
Snuckening said:
Because the blacks aren't as cucked as women are.

Women won't beat shit out of you, if you piss them off.
Click to expand...
This is pretty much the whole story. You can overpower a women physically, and/or discredit her easily. A black American is thousands of times more likely to chimp out and do you a violence.

A portion of whites are intimidated and frightened by blacks, and suspect the entire race of inherited genetic stupidity (they may be right on both counts). This makes the whites display sympathetic and generous gestures with the darkies.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Transniglet and Crabouse-united
Due to the bigotry of low expectations, a white person acting like a black person jarringly highlights the fact that modern black American culture is garbage, and people don't like that.

To elaborate, nobody critically analyzes black behavior. Whatever a black person does, you're supposed to simply take it at face value. Black behavior is viewed like a nature documentary: it's a simple, natural phenomenon that deserves no further analysis, much like avian mating rituals. Just look at the funny bird dance and move on.

Somehow, people have been indoctrinated into thinking that treating blacks like children at best or animals at worst is "anti-racist".

On the flip side, everything a white person does is to be scrutinized. As such, when a white person "acts black", people inadvertently begin to scrutinize black culture and begin to accidentally notice things they were explicitly trained to never, ever notice. This causes major cognitive dissonance in the majority of the population, so they get mad.

Women don't have that same protection (yet). You're still allowed to notice differences between men and women. You're just not allowed to verbalize them unless you couch it in praise. Thus no cognitive dissonance, thus no discomfort, thus no backlash.

tl;dr:

Animal acting like human is cute
Animal acting like animal is cute
Human acting like animal is abhorrent
Anti-racists treat blacks like animals and whites like humans
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Transniglet, Marley Rathbone, Papa Pinochet and 3 others
Schooling says being a chick is an improvement but silently teachers think niggers are terrible and let that out impressioning the youths.

Either that or we're being kind to the sexual-mimicry out of pity but won't to the Whigger because that is just too far?
1634689396663.jpgIMG_7805.PNG​
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Papa Pinochet, A Series Of Tubes and Sofonda Cox
When I was in high school my black friends were the ones that finally got me into saying the N word, both A and hard R variants. This was over a decade ago and it's insane how you could go from a group of chill friends of all races just throwing racial slurs around because they sound funny to the current state of society. I don't know what those guys are up to nowadays but I suppose it's better I keep my funny memories instead of knowing if they got sucked into the current year politics racemongering dogma shit.

I've never had that kinda experience with trannies save for one that was an internet shitlord tranny. god forbid you make any sort of joke, critique, or use a pOSSIBLY OFFENDING word against a transperson. Even before the troon mindset was the norm they were mostly fragile like that but with current year coddling by megacorps that fragility has become something fucking monstrous and is used for outright evil in some cases.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Sofonda Cox
The truth is our dear empowered womyn are in the bottom line of sjw's scoreborad. Blacks, jews, muslims, troons and everyone else are above them, so no one cares if they have being degraded.

And, to be frankly, they deserve it. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DejaThoris
As a 2000s kid I called wiggers white MCs, But i would bring wiggers back, to get rid of troons in a heartbeat.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Broseph
The Lawgiver said:
I suppose it's better I keep my funny memories instead of knowing if they got sucked into the current year politics
Click to expand...
I wish I had had this wisdom before meeting some old friends again.

----

As for the main topic: why is x woke and x socially unacceptable. The answer is always: does it help supplant western society?

I don't see why. The west is already dead, standing on the shoulders of giants and leaving little for future generations by raping and desecrating its corpse, which still has a number of fruits fully grown but few new ones growing.

But it's like war propaganda. It takes a lot of propaganda to change people's minds. But when the war is over it doesn't just go away. Just look how 1943 war propaganda from each side is still around despite being hopelessly outdated.
 
behindyourightnow said:
Because people have figured out a way to make the former profitable but not the latter. Once big pharma figures out a good reliable profit stream and designs a good marketing push for melanin injections or whatever I am sure it will change.
Click to expand...
While tranny's are profitable for cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry, and particularly the former has a strong hand in the marketing of this in the last 2 decades, the origin of the pioneers and its most ardent championers don't seem to be motivated by money as much as ideology.
 
Because it makes the entirety of identity politics look like a joke, and there is no reason why it should be excluded based on the current dogma. Race, like gender, is a social contract. Gender is a social construct, therefore it can be expressed outside or traditional cultural norms and biological characteristics. If race is social, then skin color or ancestry or genetics are not important, but the ideologues are understandably put off by the actual practice of trans-racialism but simultaneously don’t want to confront it, as it will force them to take a hard stance on what is social and what is inherent in human biology. So they just ignore it lol

Edit: but then again, these same people have never given a shit about hypocrisy before
 
  • Like
Reactions: Transniglet and Johan Hulth
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back