Why is moralfagging a bad thing?

Has it ever occurred to you that there are other outlooks than viewing everything through a universal 'death = bad' lens.
You can recognize the good in a necessary act of evil without surrendering yourself to wanton celebration. Old school executioners recognized this; they did their job, then they paid their respects after the matter was transfered over to St. Peter
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Sparkling Yuzu
The deterioration of male-female relationships, and of the family unit in addition to the fact that a lot of men just outright use women for sex and leave them with a baby is good enough proof that sex before marriage is a bad idea.
The alternative view is that maybe people should be looking to get married younger rather than sitting around waiting into middle age. The tendency to avoid marriage comes as a result of feminism/general degeneracy and correlates with all of the other corresponding destructive trends and behaviors.
You both have misinterpreted what I wrote. My comments about the "no sex before marriage" standard was explicitly in the modern context, when people do not marry until much later, and whether it is reasonable or healthy, or at all in line with basic human nature, to expect people to wait until their 30s to have sex. My comments are also directed at those very adamant, who always give much less attention to the problem that people no longer marry out of high school or while in college.
The maxim of no sex before marriage derives from the question of, when people are looking for a standard, what should they err on the side of? Should they try to minimize sex before marriage, or maximize it? You probably can't eliminate premarital sex entirely, but I don't think it's that hard to see why people should be advised to try and keep it to a minimum.
This to me is not moral-fagging but is well grounded. The sort of rhetoric I am referring to does not seek to minimize, is not merely aspirational. My position is there needs to be a balance between bible thumping prudery and hyper profligacy. Back in the day if high school or college sweethearts were on a trajectory of marriage have sex after being together for over a year. Now people don't even date they just hook-up.
Again, I am talking about finger-wagging, bible-thumping sorts who condemn a couple who is engaged with low body count with the "no slut shaming" "culture" of today.
The majority of the site is pretty liberal, just not the parts you gravitate towards in a deliberate attempt to find people to argue with and condescend to, since you're a social media brained nitwit who can't help yourself but to do so.
And this is why I always take insults about "A and H" and "Thunderdomer" as a compliment.
 
I don't support Hitler's genocide of 6 million Jews and 14 million Europeans. Do you?
This is like asking me if I 'support' the American Civil War. & while I am glad you don't 'support' the Shoah, it seems like an exercise in closing the barn doors after the horses all died in a bombing raid 50 years before you were born. The flippant way you describe it is a lil cringe though.
It is absolutely a distortion, you fat fucking retard.

You deliberately immerse yourself in, and expose yourself to, the political elements of the site which are necessarily cast-offs of other websites.
The majority of the site is pretty liberal, just not the parts you gravitate towards in a deliberate attempt to find people to argue with and condescend to, since you're a social media brained nitwit who can't help yourself but to do so.
Methinks the penguin doth protest too much. If you want to go prove how inclusive and loving the Farms are towards black people, go run a poll or something.
 
This to me is not moral-fagging but is well grounded. The sort of rhetoric I am referring to does not seek to minimize, is not merely aspirational. My position is there needs to be a balance between bible thumping prudery and hyper profligacy. Back in the day if high school or college sweethearts were on a trajectory of marriage have sex after being together for over a year. Now people don't even date they just hook-up.
Again, I am talking about finger-wagging, bible-thumping sorts who condemn a couple who is engaged with low body count with the "no slut shaming" "culture" of today.

That's really not unique to sex before marriage or any other particular subject, it's, again, just typical human nature. A certain subset of people will always take whatever moral standard or cause and push it to an extreme. It's unavoidable and never a reason to reject having standards in the first place (indeed, as we can see in Current Year, if you make the moral standard "there are no standards," people will push *that* to an extreme and start normalizing wild degeneracy).
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Norbert the Tiger
Moralfagging is hated because the internet used to be more about fucking around and having no limits, so someone coming on and crying about how mean or disgusting something was would only get met with mockery.
On that note, the rise of moralfagging (particularly of the Christian kind) online surprises me. The internet used to be edgelords. Maybe the userbase has "grown up" and moved on but a lot of it is younger people.
It really is weird to see people christpost and not get made fun of.
 
Because it's cringe and nine times out of ten said moralfaggot is probably a deeply depraved person projecting.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Mothra1988
Look, it's simple:

-When I do it I'm based and standing up for what is right.
-When you do it you're a moralfag, gtfo.
 
Yes. Moral fagging is a death knell for society as it indicates a weakness in moral compass. I've noticed this growing up all my life that even as young children, moral fagging is alive and well. People try to explain it away as "just being a good person", but I call it by its rightful name: Piety. This is behavior instilled by parents who have miniscule understanding of the world they live in and it shows in their children.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Molag Bal
If I'm on some Incan Anime Forum and people are discussing their favorite foot-inflation-netorare hentai, I really do not need to hear that the author of this particular piece was rude to his coworkers.
Nor do I care that the person this flavor of ice-cream was named after turned out after the fact to have been accused of groping women in 2006.

People just didn't evolve to care about shit happening more than ~100 miles away from them, because there never was a need to.
Obvious some issues are truly systemic or global (i.e. global warming, immigration, etc.), but most of what the average person gets upset about is essentially just interpersonal conflict between randos 1000s of miles away from them.
It feels like half my YT feed is just 'the dark past behind X' or 'why people hate Y' or some true crime bullshit. Hell half of political 'journalism' is just harping on politicians for something they said that came across as rude.

Healthy people should care about those around them, and truly (inter)national issues, and nothing else. To do anything else is to be a moralfag.
 
Moral fagging is what happens when a person insists that they’re a good person in order to either shield themselves from feeling guilt, or they’re trying to hide something about themselves which is unfavorable.

For example, a sex pest has a higher chance of moral fagging for a sex pest like Chris Chan; partially because they see themselves in him, and partially to try to look like a good person who whomever is reading.

Most people here can see through that.

If you truly feel sorry for a cow or whatever, there’s two things you can do:

1. Don’t participate in the threads in question

2. If you feel truly compelled to help them, reach out privately with your unsolicited advice and see how well that goes. Don’t do it with the hopes that the DMs will get leaked onto here, because you’re more likely to get ridiculed than praised.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Norbert the Tiger
One thing I'm surprised nobody said:

This forum hates all other form of faggotry, why not moralfaggotry too?

Throw a few moralfags on the fire, I say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kiwisee
I always thought it was frowned on because it always turns away from the issue being discussed. Morals don't really come into play unless you need a cudgel to beat someone with, right?
 
Back