US Why it’s hard to buy deodorant in Manhattan - Organised retail crime gangs are behind a shoplifting spike.


1669745762855.png

Customers dashing into a Manhattan pharmacy for deodorant these days are confronted with shelves of locked glass boxes. Buttons marked “call for assistance” bring managers over to unlock them on request. Stores have responded to an uptick in shoplifting by revamping security systems, or closing down. Rite Aid, a pharmacy, closed a branch in Hell’s Kitchen in February after losing $200,000 worth of stuff last winter. And last week Target, a big retailer, reported that a rise in “shrink” (to use the industry jargon) had reduced its gross profit margin by $400m so far this year. The National Retail Federation says inventory loss, largely driven by theft, cost retailers a record $95bn last year.

1669746045092.png

What is behind this unwelcome rise? Some speculated that prosecutors had gone soft on looting after the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. But it is hard to see any such trend in the data: generally states with more shoplifting prosecute more shoplifters (see chart). A more likely culprit is a rise in organised retail crime (orc). Carefully planned operations, where criminal groups steal large amounts of swag to flog for a profit, have grown “exponentially” in scope and sophistication in the last few years, says Lisa LaBruno of the Retail Industry Leaders Association.

The most stolen items include deodorant, laundry detergent, razors and infant formula, which are in consistent demand and are easy to sell on. orc groups typically use online marketplaces to sell their stolen wares. Last summer a couple in Alabama pled guilty to shifting $300,000-worth of stolen baby formula on eBay. Despite this, Ms LaBruno notes, there has been “little to no progress” in convincing e-commerce firms to identify and shut down criminal actors and suspicious sales. A federal law making it tougher to sell stolen goods online is making its way through Congress. The bill would force high-volume third-party sellers to provide a physical address, bank account number, and tax id, making illicit transactions riskier. This could be voted into law as early as December.

On October 17th the Department of Homeland Security launched “Operation Boiling Point”, a co-ordinated federal and local effort to disrupt orc gangs. Several states have established organised retail crime task-forces, including Utah, Illinois and California. This is a start. But as Karl Langhorst of the University of Cincinnati, points out, many of these gangs operate across state lines. He thinks the government should go further and pass the first federal law creating a nationwide database of offenders.




Part and parcel, goy!
 
A more likely culprit is a rise in organised retail crime (orc). Carefully planned operations, where criminal groups steal large amounts of swag to flog for a profit, have grown “exponentially” in scope and sophistication in the last few years, says Lisa LaBruno of the Retail Industry Leaders Association.
While I don't deny that retail has organized thief rings; most of those happen in the backroom as opposed to the floor, where cameras and a possible undercover are. Baby formula and hygiene/eauty products have always been a high targeted items; as they're disposable, and thus need to be replaced often, on top of being able to fence easily.
 
"What is behind this unwelcome rise? Some speculated that prosecutors had gone soft on looting after the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. But it is hard to see any such trend in the data: generally states with more shoplifting prosecute more shoplifters (see chart)."

I too can make up random charts of showing the data I want to be shown.
 
"What is behind this unwelcome rise? Some speculated that prosecutors had gone soft on looting after the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. But it is hard to see any such trend in the data: generally states with more shoplifting prosecute more shoplifters (see chart)."

I too can make up random charts of showing the data I want to be shown.
Completely ignoring how in California, everything below... $950, IIRC doesn't even warrant a police investigation. If it was ~$900 or less, it wasn't real shoplifting.
 
Completely ignoring how in California, everything below... $950, IIRC doesn't even warrant a police investigation. If it was ~$900 or less, it wasn't real shoplifting.
Also the fact that they're being intellectually dishonest as fuck. Who do you think are running these rings? The same pavement apes DAs won't prosecute.
 
While I don't deny that retail has organized thief rings; most of those happen in the backroom as opposed to the floor, where cameras and a possible undercover are. Baby formula and hygiene/eauty products have always been a high targeted items; as they're disposable, and thus need to be replaced often, on top of being able to fence easily.
Its also a chart where shoplifting REPORTS and ARRESTS occurs.

Since many shithole cities have more or less decriminalized shoplifting for niggers and urban police have simply given up due to no recruits, money or other incentives to do thier jobs (because of BLM nonsense) than no shit the chart shows fewer arrests and fewer reports of shoplifting in shitholes that have embraced BLM.

Actually looking at the data critically REINFORCES the obvious conclusion rather than dismisses it.
 
I’d assume that if you have a 950 dollar limit for prosecution, a gang will send fifty people out to pinch 900 bucks worth of merchandise each and bring it back for fencing.
A return to zero tolerance broken windows style policing would fix a lot of these issues. We all know why that won’t be done
 
The National Retail Federation says inventory loss, largely driven by theft, cost retailers a record $95bn last year.
How could white men do this!?!?

What is behind this unwelcome rise? Some speculated that prosecutors had gone soft on looting after the Black Lives Matter protests in 2020. But it is hard to see any such trend in the data
Especially when we refuse to classify nigger theft as theft.

A federal law making it tougher to sell stolen goods online is making its way through Congress.
Oh joy. Instead of solving the problem at it's source by being tougher on crime and allowing store-owners/managers to defend themselves, their employees, and their wares... let's instead use daddy government to suffocate us all.
I look forward to seeing the government extend this beyond stolen goods and make all online goods tougher to sell.
You will not be allowed to sell your old phone, car, or furniture at your discretion unless the gov't gets it's slice.
 
Last edited:
There is nothing morally wrong with stealing from a BlackRock-funded business.
The older I get, the more I find myself shifting from lawful to chaotic. When the law exists to shackle the common man and enable the bandit, it can be morally disregarded.

As for the good-evil spectrum, you don't get to decide that. Everyone thinks they're the good guy, even when they're clearly not. You only get to find out your full alignment once you die. Personally I'm aiming for chaotic good. Chaotic neutral is for edgy teenagers who post joker memes. I'd like to believe that God would understand the "but bro, they posted cringe" defense and upgrade me to "good" just so I don't have to be associated with that.
 
Back