Why some races are objectively better than others?

Divine Power

Unleash the natural order
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 13, 2022
Do you feel that when you deal with a specific races you are getting treated better and rewarded more but with Indians and blacks for example you are getting shamed and punished and often scammed out of earth, what is the cause of the superiority of some races to others.

Why did white people become more advanced than other races? How that happened?

Why If you allocate resources to enable Race B, and all you get is violence, dependency, no significant culture, and no technical progress, then you have wasted those resources. On the other hand, if you allocate resources to enable Race A, and you get a peaceful society of productive people, much culture, and much technical progress
 
It depends on multiple factors that you might not even have thought of, such as the size of cars.
For instance, you may normally think of the Monaco Grand Prix as an extremely boring race that's decided solely by the qualifying session, but if you look at Formula E at Monaco, it's really fucking exciting stuff, full of ballsy overtakes and exciting battles. Formula E cars are significantly smaller than Formula 1 cars.
On the other hand, I understand your frustration with races because of current aero regulations turning most overtakes into DRS scenarios.
 
Just like the miracle of life on Earth, White culture was a miracle that faced many trials to get where it was today. We became so chiseled from countless wars, religions, enlightenment, renaissance, and expeditions that we conquered the known world with our culture. We became the dominant ruling structure either through monarchy or democracy, and set the standard. Our culture created the economy and governments that exist today, and therefore we are best suited to inhabit them. Every single other culture was visited by White men and brought into the fold through history, and therefore did not have the advantage of familiarity with our systems. Other races are catching up, and even beating us in certain aspects, but this is because they understand the game and haven't gotten lazy and complacent like modern Americans.

It is hard to fathom today, but we earned our spot as the superior and dominant race. We created so many amazing things, dominated the empires of old, took the best parts of them and kept creating something new and improved.

To that end, trying to uplift an inferior race who has not endured our hardships, or was just the least retarded culture in an area, is futile. You cannot put a silk hat on a pig, and you cannot give non-white cultures white tools and expect them to become The British Empire.
 
Why did white people become more advanced than other races? How that happened?
There's bound to be someone that brings up Jared Diamond's guns germs and steel and let me just say you're retarded to believe this anti-white propaganda. But because so many do believe it, I'd say jews are more advanced. The way political movements in any white country can only be succesful if they pledge undying support to israel.

Historically speaking it's not like europeans were dominant all the time, certainly plenty of inventions and developments were made in china or india first. Romans weren't the first gigantic empire either, they were preceded by acheamenids and persians.

But to give the white devil his due, there is a good unique mix of adventurism, intelligence, technology, theology and conflict hardenedness that allowed europeans to control and influence most of the world. To such a degree that even if that power wanes the influence will be long felt and all cultures permanently changed.

That's something that seperates the empires I mentioned from other big ones like the Mongolian empire, as they ended up being more influenced by the countries they conquered than vice versa.
 
Adaptations to winter, which is why intelligence typically rises in colder climates. You have to plan ahead, have long time preference, be disciplined, and have well organized, strong communities to withstand the winters, in addition to the very dangerous predators that thrived in the winter before white men hunted them to extinction. Meanwhile a dude in the Savannah can just chase prey until it is exhausted from overheating and exertion, and a dude in the jungle can just pick up fruit that falls off a tree year round. There's much less need for long term planning, communities, discipline, or organization, because there isn't the pressure to develop and maintain those traits. Every culture has independently realized that light skin makes for superior minds and behaviors, but for (((some))) reason having pattern recognition is now seen as an evil quality to possess.

Progressives get really mad about this, and you can tell that people are mad because they don't want to engage with what you actually said, but there's a reason there's no counterargument to pointing out that whites and most other pales are superior.
 
IQ, genetics and climate.

Greece and Rome were the cradle of civilization for a reason.
But there were quite advanced civilisations in the fertile crescent way before Greece and Rome. It's where the neolithical revolution started.
It still fits with the whole winter and time preference theory since it still relies on long term planning and distinct seasons to grow crops in.
 
It may be uncomfortable to explore these topics, but I would say that the race that has established the global standards for morality, including the terminally liberal "all things are equal" belief you just espoused are the morally superior race.

European ethics dominate the planet because they are, at least for what they are, the best we've yet to accomplish in terms of deriving a moral scale of right and wrong in absolute terms without God.

Other races are incapable of creating, or adhering to the morality of the world which is why the West has to enforce "human rights violations" against nations and races which cannot conceptualize the virtues of western civilization.

I'm not going to ramble further because you strike me as a faggot who won't understand, or will dismiss me entirely so I will only reiterate that the only reason you believe what you just wrote is because you've internalized the superior morality of the western world to such a degree that you don't even believe that other races are inferior when they fail to produce the morality you are asserting in your post.

That alone proves the superiority of our race over all others.
1000026353.jpgDrag-Queen-Story-Hour_01774c.jpgbd.jpg20221127-drag.jpg_methode_times_prod_web_bin_b2467970-5578-11e9-a8f5-a9ee11ff7e6d.png
The European ethics in question.
 
Why are some species of dog better than others?
Domesticated canines are more or less the same species the world over given they all produce fertile off-spring when bred with one another. You're thinking of breeds, exemplified best by purebreds. The difference between a purebred and the common mutt is the purebred is inbred. Look at every line of fucked up canines and you'll see it's the result of inbreeding. Of course, humans and dogs aren't the same. A peoples with hundreds of millions need not worry about inbreeding (unless marrying first-cousins is a tradition, to which the solution would be mixing with literally anybody other than close relatives.) A better analogy would be comparing species of canidae. Many can produce mixed off-spring. But when a genetic distance between parents is too great, what results is a gulf of mediocrity wherein offspring cannot keep up with either mother or father in fitness. Surviving life as a mixed bastard is sometimes be easier while other times harder.
 
Last edited:
Epstein is a jew, Trudeau is half Cuban, most drag queens are jews or hispanic, the tattooed slut and her pupperboy are brown.

"European"
View attachment 6706451
So ebstein is partially Jewish, Trudeau is partially white Hispanic and the perverted couple are allegedly non white because.. reasons. Literally all of these pictures have been taken in white countries. How come whenever whites fuck up its the jews fault but when non whites it isn't?
 
If you are a proper representative of your better race, then you should be able to figure it out yourself and don't need to ask.
 
I believe that with proper education and an adequate environment (in a "good" culture), any normal individual of any race can become a beautiful & an above decent person. Sadly, that's not what usually happens in this world, so you get scum.

You know, to say something else in this #742346 thread about race realism.
 
So ebstein is partially Jewish, Trudeau is partially white Hispanic and the perverted couple are allegedly non white because.. reasons. Literally all of these pictures have been taken in white countries. How come whenever whites fuck up its the jews fault but when non whites it isn't?
For anti-Semitic neo-nazis, all of the negative aspects of "white" culture are externalized and projected onto Jews. The reality is that many of these Jews that they point to in Hollywood or in other centers of influence/power are majority European racially. How different are Ashkenazim from Italians or Poles? And yet both Italians and Poles would be considered "white" by neo-nazis today. Wealthy Ashkenazim act no differently from upper middle-class "white" people.

As always, neo-nazis utilize HBD and race realism when it benefits their racial hatred, as they attribute poor behaviors of other racial groups to genetics, while the poor behaviors of their own racial group are the result of "Jewish subversion" or a consequence of socialization.

I wouldn't expect any less of a group of people who live and die by /pol/ infographics.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Joined 2024
Back