Why women are not loyal? it is because they are weak or is there any other evolutionally reason

[BPD Gunt Rider]

Hypergamy has a negative connotation, but when you think about it, women practice it because they are acting in their rational self-interests. They want to have offspring and pass on genes with the best possible partner. It's not something done out of callousness or ingratitude.

Hypergamy isn't negative or positive. It is what it is. I just wish women would admit it instead of spewing their usual bullshit.

 

[umami's milk]

If being gay was a choice, I'd be slurpin' tadpoles all day and night. Unfortunately, only autism is a choice.

I think there is still hope for you. @Don't Tread on Me , show him the ropes!

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

While everything you said may or may not be true, keep in mind that Current Year is a historical anomaly for the human species. Our atavistic monkey brains haven't evolved to catch up with it. Since it's all happening and changing so rapidly, our instincts are going haywire rather than being able to properly adapt.

That's what makes all of this so fucking frustrating, but I still don't believe that women were a juice worth the squeeze, regardless of the time period. Even going back a couple of generations, it's sad to know that the 55-year marriages of your grandparents were not held together out of love as men understand it, but by survival and a mere tolerance for each other, only spurred on by a youthful burst of hormones that gradually fades sometimes into contentment or divorce. That's as depressing as it fucking gets, man. Love is supposed to be everything to the human experience, but the concept of hypergamy itself precludes the possibility of genuine, reciprocal, love, and in some cases, even affection, as 80% of men aren't even attractive to them, going by the dating app numbers. If it's all just a front so she can squirt out some midgets, again, why play ball? Is it really worth the kid if life is just a lie?

"bundle of mistakes"
While "You hate women cuz ur gae" is a faggy phrase, many of it's targets tend to be bigger fags, and this term's level of homosexuality is on par with the leftist insult "stormweenie"

Therefore, you are a fag.

Is "Bipolar SSRI addict" better? Prove modern women aren't just that in the face of three waves of feminism, social media, and their monoculture of conspicuous consumption. Women are their own worst enemy, and you're welcome to disagree even if you're wrong, but after all this, do you think society has improved for them, given all of this liberation? They're less happy than ever, they're pickier than ever, and now they complain about having to work a 9-5, which is something they've wanted to do and fought for, for decades, even going as far as to abandon the literal one thing they're meant for, motherhood. Yes, as Meat Target said, the current age is an anomaly, but that doesn't mean we're not living in it right now. I still have yet to find a bitch on the crust of this earth who isn't a self-sabotaging yeast infection on legs, and while they do exist, the women who are good people are exceptionally rare.

 

[Geddy Lee's Fee and See]

I don't think it's hypergamy or what have you since frankly, outside of war and extreme circumstances in the past, cheating all that nonsense of jumping from partner to partner was rarer for both men and women. I just think modern women are raised poorly and with no practical skills or mental fortitude (unlike in the past where such a thing was unheard of even by nobles who had it relatively easy compared to the common man) and they have no real sense of shame in doing this type of shit and actively praise it. It explains a lot of behaviors that women do commonly nowadays like having Onlyfans instesd of getting a real job, trying to justify killing their child due to their bad decision making, having very little to offer in a relationship past sex, etc. They're also just bad partners in that a lot of them are very flaky and leave over the most trivial of things and look for a man the next day. Are all women like this? No but a plurality if not majority are and I can't ignore the data.


I'll be crystal clear and say that most men have an analogous problem and aren't taught to be upstanding moral citizens who past their own wisdom down to the next generations, but just corporate drones that chase after money and short term pleasure, ensuring this cycle of dgenerative behaviors continues. But this thread is about women, so that's my two cents. Basically, bad parenting and bad influences create bad people.

Edit: Typo

 

[Meat Target]

They can hold up the lie that they love you for 20 years and then dip, consequence-free.

love as men understand it, but by survival and a mere tolerance for each other, only spurred on by a youthful burst of hormones that gradually fades sometimes into contentment or divorce.

Okay, I have to address this:

Our societal concept of "Love", for both men and women, has been flawed for generations, predating the Sexual Revolution. Namely, this notion that love is a feeling, or something mushy and sentimental.

If you're familiar with Classical or Biblical Greek, you'd know that it has four different words for "love", each with different meanings:

• Eros, meaning desire or want;
• Storge, meaning affection or "puppy love";
• philios, meaning enjoyment;
• And Agape, meaning to will the other person's good.

Agape is considered the highest and most noble of the Four Loves, because it is not looking out for itself, but for the other. Think of the parents who sacrifice lives of comfort and pleasure to raise their children.

Marriage and relationships are not a constant party. You're going to have your ups and downs.

I once heard it said that your wedding day should be the day you love your spouse the least. That love needs to be intentionally cultivated and maintained. You shouldn't "fall in love", you should rise in love.

Love needs to be recontextualized as not an emotion or a feeling, but as an action, a decision that is consciously made every day.

And yes, I know that's all high-falutin' idealism that's hard to come by in this messy, fallen world of ours.

 

[Odd Opossum]

Incels have been so openly whiny and pathetic that I'm predicting a massive banwave in near future across a ton of sites, they've been too loud for too long.

 

[BULLY HUNTER_78]

I’d argue that men are at least equally non-loyal. Most men would cheat on their wives if a supermodel threw themselves at them. Humans in general like to monkey branch and I haven’t noticed one gender being particularly more noble than the other.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

If you're familiar with Classical or Biblical Greek, you'd know that it has four different words for "love", each with different meanings:

Agape (and to a lesser extent, philios) is exactly the form of love (and, by extension, loyalty) I'm convinced that today's women cannot express. The whole reason why any of this matters is to bring a new, better, iteration of humanity into the fold. I DON'T think it's always been absent, because then there would be more mothers microwaving their babies. It is something they had, but this time period has all but destroyed their maternal and romantic drives. Without that, a woman is absolutely nothing but a burden. Without that critical component, they're aborting their children, abandoning men, and trying to take the place of men in society and the workforce. They're hurting themselves constantly in the name of their own empowerment and happiness, yet they're miserable as fuck and make it everyone's problem. Something has got to give.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Because of feminism mainly, but they're also just somewhat more prone to it just because of their general nature as the softer sex, having a weaker will. This was inherently understood but also articulated by certain philosophers.

This seems to be why, traditionally, it's been common for men to be seen as "controlling", limiting what women do. It's to account for what can be referred to as an "occasion of sin" to borrow a religious term, essentially limiting the opportunity for women to be exposed to circumstances which test that weaker will.

Of course, there's good women and bad men, so this is all just generalizations, so you shouldn't be misogynistic based on this.

Tldr; Yes.

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

If being gay was a choice, I'd be slurpin' tadpoles all day and night. Unfortunately, only autism is a choice.

You can settle down with a male life partner that you commit to, as that's far more practical and safe than living alone. You may be young now but you won't be for long and one bad accident will put you down for days. You need someone to take care of you, someone who will do so unquestionably and for free, so bonding with another male and forming a lifelong pair even if there's no attraction is still worth your time and energy.

 

[Sparkling Yuzu]

You can settle down with a male life partner that you commit to, as that's far more practical and safe than living alone. You may be young now but you won't be for long and one bad accident will put you down for days. You need someone to take care of you, someone who will do so unquestionably and for free, so bonding with another male and forming a lifelong pair even if there's no attraction is still worth your time and energy.

This is where your "hypergamy" bullshit ultimately leads you incels. Fucking other dudes because you hate women that much.

 

[ArnoldPalmer]

It's biological fact. You definitely could've found a better angle than denying science. :^)

You can settle down with a male life partner that you commit to, as that's far more practical and safe than living alone. You may be young now but you won't be for long and one bad accident will put you down for days. You need someone to take care of you, someone who will do so unquestionably and for free, so bonding with another male and forming a lifelong pair even if there's no attraction is still worth your time and energy.

Nah, that's gayer than just living until it gets too hard. My security blanket is the Mossberg.

 

[KingCoelacanth]

Its an evolutionary reason.
For hundreds of thousands of years humans were tribes at constant war with each other. When a stronger tribe conquered a weaker tribe, they would also get their women. A women being loyal to her tribe would just get her killed and ensure that her genetic trail ends there, so she's disposed to switching sides.

Its one of the big reasons why women are so pro immigration and migrants, they have an evolutionary instinct that compels them to either see their men defend the tribe and prove their worth, or to be conquered.

 

[SpergioLeonne]

Women are capable of loyalty. It’s just that sometimes they get with you out of a lack of something better to do, and you go along with it and don’t ask yourself the right questions about what it is

 

[ChefKiss]

Men put out more effort at the start of a relationship to get the woman to date them
Starting a new relationship with a new guy is a way for women to maximize what they're getting out of relationships, more gifts, more holidays, more fancy restaurants etc

 

[DDR Yoga]

Charles Manson and David Koresh never had problems with female disloyalty.

 

[Irredemable Retardation]

It's biological fact. You definitely could've found a better angle than denying science. :^)

But this manosphere science only barely has more value than troons' "female brains" crap, lol

 

[Don't Tread on Me]

This is where your "hypergamy" bullshit ultimately leads you incels. Fucking other dudes because you hate women that much.

Exactly. I am correct to hate women. Women are disloyal, abusive, manipulative liars. They are drugged up with birth control and they believe men aren't needed in society. Disgusting treacherous cunts, the lot of them.

 

[glass_houses]

It's because you are so unpleasant and generally awful to be around, yet demand a high degree of attractiveness, that the women who settle for you are just as bottom of the barrel personalities you are.

There are terrible women in the world, just as there are terrible men in the world. There are good women in the world, just as there are good men in the world. If all of the women you know are terrible people, I recommend that you consider an old saying:

"If you meet an arsehole today, that's unfortunate. If every single person you meet today is an arsehole, you are the arsehole."

 

[RussianParasite]

It's because you are so unpleasant and generally awful to be around, yet demand a high degree of attractiveness, that the women who settle for you are just as bottom of the barrel personalities you are.

There are terrible women in the world, just as there are terrible men in the world. There are good women in the world, just as there are good men in the world. If all of the women you know are terrible people, I recommend that you consider an old saying:

"If you meet an arsehole today, that's unfortunate. If every single person you meet today is an arsehole, you are the arsehole."

Couldn’t have said it better myself. Don’t know what to tell you dude(s), it’s never been a problem for me. Work on yourself and get better at judging people’s characters.