Culture Why You Should Reconsider Using a Puzzle Piece Symbol for Autism Awareness Month

Link (Archive)

Why You Should Reconsider Using a Puzzle Piece Symbol for Autism Awareness Month​

3D10060E-F80D-43D7-8600-51948ABD7E62.jpeg
World Autism Awareness Month has arrived, meaning both those within and outside of the autism community will increase their efforts to raise awareness for and promote acceptance of autism. However, while advocating, it’s important to note that one associated symbol has grown outdated.

It’s common during World Autism Awareness Month for social media posts, merchandise, and posters to feature a puzzle piece symbol, which is meant to represent autism. Many individuals in the community, though, have begun asking for people to refrain from using puzzle-piece imagery. In place of the puzzle piece, a new symbol has arisen to represent autism: a rainbow-colored infinity sign.
8ED13950-4FD1-4201-A0F7-8D7724C58588.jpeg
For many years, the Autism Awareness Month symbol was a ribbon made out of rainbow-colored interlocking puzzle pieces. The controversial but extremely prominent organization Autism Speaks also adopted the puzzle concept as its logo, which is a single multi-colored puzzle piece. As a result, many began to associate puzzle pieces as a symbol of autism itself. Hence, it’s understandable that some may be confused about the change and why the puzzle piece symbol was in need of an update.

The puzzle piece symbol’s questionable origins​

The puzzle piece symbol first came into use in 1963, when it was designed by Gerald Gasson, a parent and board member for the National Autistic Society in the UK. The original design was very different from the design ultimately adopted by Autism Speaks and for Autism Awareness Month. Back then, it was a half-green, half-black puzzle piece; in the center of it was an illustration of a child crying. Gasson was not a member of the neurodivergent community, although he was a father to a child with autism.

The symbol was meant to represent the “puzzling” nature of autism and quickly became the official logo of the NAS. By 1999, the Autism Society of America adopted the puzzle piece concept and introduced the popularized autism awareness symbol of the ribbon made of puzzle pieces. However, this society is one of the most controversial in the nation, as it has emphasized trying to “cure” autism instead of promoting acceptance of autism. It has even gone as far as to promote harmful methods of “treating” autism, such as chelation therapy, and spread misinformation about vaccines causing autism.

Soon, Autism Speaks, which was founded in 2005, also grasped the concept of the puzzle piece, making its logo a single puzzle piece that is purple and blue. According to their website, “The puzzle piece, with its current spectrum of colors, is meant to be representative of the spectrum of perspectives and experiences autistic people may have.” Not coincidentally, this organization also has a sordid history, given its framing of autism as a “disease” that needs a cure and the release of commercials that raise further fear and stigma around autism.

Why the autism puzzle piece is controversial​

Reading its history, one can immediately see several problems with the autism puzzle piece symbol. For one, it’s hard to say it accurately reflects the autistic community when a neurotypical individual created it. While parents of autistic children certainly can have valuable insights and perspectives, it can’t be for them to decide what is the best representation or framing of autism. Meanwhile, every time one promotes the puzzle piece symbol, it can be seen as promoting the two controversial organizations that further popularized Gasson’s concept.

Most importantly, many in the autism community have spoken out to confirm that they don’t feel the puzzle piece defines them. Paula Jessop, who has autism and once served as Altogether Autism’s advisor, summarized the problems with the puzzle piece symbol. She acknowledged that the puzzle piece is a reminder of the harm done by Autism Speaks, stating, “Autistic people find the puzzle piece a reminder of an organization that spent years running very public campaigns in America that framed autism as a tragic disease. To autistic people, the puzzle piece represents negativity about autism, not a positive perspective of autism.”

Secondly, she pointed out how the puzzle piece often reinforces the idea that there’s something “puzzling” or “mysterious” about individuals with autism. Jessop writes, “For autistic people, this is problematic, as we don’t wish to be viewed as akin to a puzzle that can’t be worked out.” She also explains that one may assume a person or organization using this symbol either did not consult with the neurodivergent community or disregarded their feelings. On social media, many other individuals with autism have expressed similar views to Jessop, criticizing that the symbol can be interpreted as them being incomplete or that autism needs to be “solved.”
77275CE5-9C0B-4499-8763-607EE84D289D.jpegEC3BA90F-B0AC-4544-9F18-2AF605AE2903.jpegC0C11A0A-C76D-46A8-B8B8-3A98970791B6.jpeg23008233-3F7E-4D06-9CC6-CAA6E3409522.jpeg
A common alternative to the puzzle piece is the rainbow infinity symbol. According to Cross River Therapy, “The rainbow represents the spectrum of autism, highlighting the wide range of strengths, challenges, and characteristics within the community. It promotes the idea that all individuals, regardless of where they fall on the spectrum, should be accepted and valued for who they are.”

Another variation of this concept is the gold infinity symbol. Ultimately, the problem with the puzzle piece is that those outside the autism community, including many who held negative views on autism, decided it represented autism. It’s important that the autistic community decide for themselves what represents them. If you are unsure of what symbol to use, you can always reach out to an organization like the Autistic Self Advocacy Network or consult someone you know who has autism for input.
 
It's funny how the super-high-functioning, recently-diagnosed, barely-autists are the ones insisting that autism is nothing but a positive and making the tranny-suicide argument that autism hardships are only because society isn't properly accomodating.
I am on the higher end, but most of my symptoms were when I was very young and I’ve since outgrown most of them. Hypersensitive to light and touch, self harm, meltdowns, pretty sure I was facially blind. Even thought I’m better now it’s is absolutely a detriment more than a gift. I would definitely be much happier without it. I really fucking hate the people that populate the “community” and participating in groups irl is fucking miserable. Our behavior is inherently anti-human and reptilian, and I don’t have any expectations that society will ever fully adapt and accommodate with sincerity.
 
I am on the higher end, but most of my symptoms were when I was very young and I’ve since outgrown most of them. Hypersensitive to light and touch, self harm, meltdowns, pretty sure I was facially blind. Even thought I’m better now it’s is absolutely a detriment more than a gift. I would definitely be much happier without it. I really fucking hate the people that populate the “community” and participating in groups irl is fucking miserable. Our behavior is inherently anti-human and reptilian, and I don’t have any expectations that society will ever fully adapt and accommodate with sincerity.
I find autistic advocacy groups to... have identity politics as a special interest. Ironically, it's in a way that make it harder for auties to make friends. You'll have one spastic who doesn't give a shit about calling people faggots, and another who is balls deep in the anus of queer identities and how they overlap with autism.

The black and white thinking is pretty toxic to relationships as it is, but then you add all this other cockamamie to it, and it's a Grade-S Disaster.
 
I am on the higher end, but most of my symptoms were when I was very young and I’ve since outgrown most of them. Hypersensitive to light and touch, self harm, meltdowns, pretty sure I was facially blind. Even thought I’m better now it’s is absolutely a detriment more than a gift. I would definitely be much happier without it. I really fucking hate the people that populate the “community” and participating in groups irl is fucking miserable. Our behavior is inherently anti-human and reptilian, and I don’t have any expectations that society will ever fully adapt and accommodate with sincerity.
What do autists think about psilocybin as treatment? Modulates serotonin levels that autism/depression messes with. I've read comments about people using it to basically cure their autism, it makes them feel more connected to others, etc.
 
What do autists think about psilocybin as treatment? Modulates serotonin levels that autism/depression messes with. I've read comments about people using it to basically cure their autism, it makes them feel more connected to others, etc.
smoke weed everyday
no bullshit, keeps me from having to sort out wrassle clowns of mexico based on employment with major companies, couple of legit tismo buddies who run screaming from anything illegal have accidentally got stoned and also agree it helps a shitload
the call to Wapner in Five Minutes is still there, but you can be like "yeah, some Wapner sounds cool, I should get on that later but have some shit to do now"
 
smoke weed everyday
no bullshit, keeps me from having to sort out wrassle clowns of mexico based on employment with major companies, couple of legit tismo buddies who run screaming from anything illegal have accidentally got stoned and also agree it helps a shitload
the call to Wapner in Five Minutes is still there, but you can be like "yeah, some Wapner sounds cool, I should get on that later but have some shit to do now"
Weed is probably a bigger crapshoot than shrooms. People swear by the spliff, but THC gummies sucked ass for me.

Also depends on the weed strain, afaik. The gummies were mixed and it was unpleasant.

ETA: Pot brownies had the same effect, but the guy I got them from has a high tolerance to it, so there was more weed in there than I could really tolerate. Same effect as before, but stronger.
 
Last edited:
@Retink Retunk this article has your name all over it
Actually, way back when I made this pfp
autism.PNG


I think I commented on here somewhere how retarded the anti-puzzle piece movement was with this shit. This would be on my original account, and I still stand by it that the puzzle piece is superior to any other 'tism sign.
 
Weed is probably a bigger crapshoot than shrooms. People swear by the spliff, but THC gummies sucked ass for me.

Also depends on the weed strain, afaik. The gummies were mixed and it was unpleasant.
tbh I've always found "weed strains" to be sort of a meme, but it's def a YMMV thing
 
Even sativa vs indica and not just goofy-ass names like COCK TORTURER 10,000 and SUNNY DEEDEE? Cuz I think the stuff this guy had for both gummies and brownies (made by him) were a mix of sativa and indica.
they also miraculously become "hybrid" with whatever nondescript powers mixed therein
I got into weed when it was still mostly illegal so my choices were "do you want an eighth of an oz of what I have, or more" so I quickly grew deaf to dealers explaining how it was Struple Burple grown right out of King Solomon's asshole and stopped giving any fucks beyond basic "dirt, mids, good shit, or fabric softener dirt"
 
I am on the higher end, but most of my symptoms were when I was very young and I’ve since outgrown most of them. Hypersensitive to light and touch, self harm, meltdowns, pretty sure I was facially blind. Even thought I’m better now it’s is absolutely a detriment more than a gift. I would definitely be much happier without it. I really fucking hate the people that populate the “community” and participating in groups irl is fucking miserable. Our behavior is inherently anti-human and reptilian, and I don’t have any expectations that society will ever fully adapt and accommodate with sincerity.
I'm not as much of a spaz as you, but still an introvert who forgets names immediately, prefers systems/mechanics to people/relationships, and sometimes overlooks social cues/reactions. As my career moved from things and numbers to interpreting and explaining them, I learned more of the social/emotional stuff, but it still takes effort.

Autism used to be referred to as "extreme male brain" syndrome, and to many people your average engineer looks like autism-lite. Maybe it's all a spectrum, or maybe Assburgers is just when IT/Warhammer/car nerds refuse to learn how to interact with less system-focused people?
 
I'm not as much of a spaz as you, but still an introvert who forgets names immediately, prefers systems/mechanics to people/relationships, and sometimes overlooks social cues/reactions. As my career moved from things and numbers to interpreting and explaining them, I learned more of the social/emotional stuff, but it still takes effort.

Autism used to be referred to as "extreme male brain" syndrome, and to many people your average engineer looks like autism-lite. Maybe it's all a spectrum, or maybe Assburgers is just when IT/Warhammer/car nerds refuse to learn how to interact with less system-focused people?
Careful - if you say that, you might make autistic women think they're actually doods.

It's interesting you mention that, though. Some women say they always felt something was off when they were kids. For me, I had no idea aside from the fact that kids thought I was weird and disgusting. How can you know something is wrong if you don't have a correct sense of how to behave? I don't personally count "nobody liked me and I didn't know why" as an answer, since saying you knew something was off implies a level of self-awareness autistic kids don't typically have.
 
Last edited:
The big problem with this discourse is that it's a tug of war between people with autism who are higher-functioning and have fewer support needs on one side, and the parents and caregivers of people with more severe and complex needs on the other. Neither really likes to admit the other exists and they essentially talk past each other. Anyone who thinks that treatment or a cure for autism would be something undesirable is someone who hasn't seen how horrible severe autism can really be.
It's more like between autistic people and non-autistic Karens who want the entire spotlight and a Neverending pity party because their kid is autistic.

Some of them also exploit said autistic kid on social media as an added bonus.
 
It's more like between autistic people and non-autistic Karens who want the entire spotlight and a Neverending pity party because their kid is autistic.

Some of them also exploit said autistic kid on social media as an added bonus.
Then the people who are supposed to be helping autists treat every single one of them like they're diagnosed intellectually disabled. You could have a 190 IQ, be the most eloquent speaker in the room, and they'd still treat you like a toddler. Drives me nuts - it usually happens with the Autism Speaks-associated organizations. Really though, it seems like anyone who works with learning disabled people are prone to treating us like that. It's even worse if they work with peeps that actually have stuff like Down Syndrome.

These same assclowns have the nerve to put words in the mouths of Level 3 autistic kids and say you NEED to use person first language for yourself because it's offensive to autistic kids who have a comorbid intellectual disability to the point where they're both non-verbal and incapable of learning math beyond the level of a 3 year old. It's awfully convenient when the non-verbal autistic kid always agrees with their wrangler, isn't it? Really makes you think about who is calling the shots. I would have been okay with them saying they personally don't like it, but I don't think the kids really understand the implications of one verbiage over the other. Even for people without verbal issues, it's a bit of a subjective case that has a lot to do with how people see themselves and how they perceive others as treating them.

Frankly, for a group that cares so much about people who have severe autism, it's a bit contradictory for them to hijack the statement about how disability doesn't define them. In fact, there are a sizeable amount of autistic people that explicitly disagree with the use of person-first language, because having autism does affect how they live their life. While it isn't a tragedy, it does cause a significant amount of distress since being a social retard in a society where you need to be socially acceptable is going to be a major point of conflict in your life.
 
Last edited:
Then the people who are supposed to be helping autists treat every single one of them like they're diagnosed intellectually disabled. You could have a 190 IQ, be the most eloquent speaker in the room, and they'd still treat you like a toddler. Drives me nuts - it usually happens with the Autism Speaks-associated organizations. Really though, it seems like anyone who works with learning disabled people are prone to treating us like that. It's even worse if they work with peeps that actually have stuff like Down Syndrome.
The sped teacher baby voice is one of the things I hate most in the world. I think special Ed is a field that tends to attract patronizing, narcissistic assholes with a savior complex that don't truly see disabled people as human.

Special books special kids is an example of what I'm talking about.
 
Back