Plagued William "Billy D" Usher / cyguration & OneAngryGamer (oneangrygamer.net) - Joe McCarthy if McCarthy were a self-hating Black Pedophile alongside his Base of Authoritarian Wingnuts who hate The Gays™ & Overwatch; Definitely Not (((Nazis))); From Sperging about Anything in Multimedia to Splurging out Garbage Articles

View attachment 1594884
They cry so much soy milk that they got a blocking app that only works on the comments sention to block people. lol

So fucking sad.

View attachment 1594889
Link to their website for laughing memes.
View attachment 1594892
lol so fucking sad indeed. Living rent-free in their minds like that.
View attachment 1594893
If they are angry about the guests so much, why not make it such a way that you need an account there? Or at least have some bans?

Oh yeah, maybe for them banning is censorship I guess.
 
View attachment 1594884
They cry so much soy milk that they got a blocking app that only works on the comments sention to block people. lol
>Cry "censorship!" every time they get banned off Twitter or Disquis or any of the 8 million other sites that can't tolerate their level of sheer autistic retardation
>Create app to censor comments they don't like

It's like poetry.
 
>Cry "censorship!" every time they get banned off Twitter or Disquis or any of the 8 million other sites that can't tolerate their level of sheer autistic retardation
>Create app to censor comments they don't like

It's like poetry.
They'll just twist around and say "NUH-UH, it's not censorship if they aren't banned or their comments aren't removed!" even though the whole idea revolving around hiding comments from guests without them knowing about it via a plugin is similar to shadowbanning aka users can still post what they want but nobody would see them which is pretty much what they are doing, just via a plugin.

Even if they give the stupid excuse that "It's a plugin, not much will use it so it isn't technically a shadowban because some people would still see the comments", okay fine, but why would they even need a plugin to hide guest posts if they can just ignore them? Isn't that what ThyBonesConsumed suggested to ResetEraTakes, aka "you could just ignore"?
 
They'll just twist around and say "NUH-UH, it's not censorship if they aren't banned or their comments aren't removed!" even though the whole idea revolving around hiding comments from guests without them knowing about it via a plugin is similar to shadowbanning aka users can still post what they want but nobody would see them which is pretty much what they are doing, just via a plugin.

Even if they give the stupid excuse that "It's a plugin, not much will use it so it isn't technically a shadowban because some people would still see the comments", okay fine, but why would they even need a plugin to hide guest posts if they can just ignore them? Isn't that what ThyBonesConsumed suggested to ResetEraTakes, aka "you could just ignore"?
Simply put, they are SJWs in a conservative alt lite flavor.

Edit: The OAG Twitter account has of yet to Tweet out the Kevin Sonic article, odd imho.
 
Last edited:
Christ, they're still hanging onto TLOU2?
OAG TLOU2 Propaganda.jpg
OAG anime haters.png OAG Jews on a Plane.jpg OAG Naomi Osaka.jpg Quickshooter Tulsi.png 5f5db5914844dda19df987ef.png
 
Nah, I didn't like it but it isn't even the worst triple A game this year, that would be the Avengers game, which makes me sad that we didn't get OAG articles during it's release.
The Avengers game is like an AI shat out what a video game should be after being fed a written description.

It felt like it was originally going to be a mobile game because of how limited and slow everything was. There's like 3 types of enemies for the whole game and only 2 bosses.
 
You see you lose if you pick Hitler. He may have held most of Europe but it was only for a limited time.

Charlemagne and Napoleon held Europe for much much longer and pissed off way more people during their day. Picking Hitler is the same as picking the Ottoman Empire, there are far better historical examples out there if you want a leader/regime who promoted nationalism.
 
You see you lose if you pick Hitler. He may have held most of Europe but it was only for a limited time.

Charlemagne and Napoleon held Europe for much much longer and pissed off way more people during their day. Picking Hitler is the same as picking the Ottoman Empire, there are far better historical examples out there if you want a leader/regime who promoted nationalism.

The chad french conquerors versus the virgin german furher

 
Back