No, but throwing all the stuff pointing towards it in the bin just because his trolls act retarded on the day that ends with "y" is rather ignorant. I'd agree if this happened just once, but it just keeps piling up.
I didn't say throw out your "evidence", I said you are presuming Wings's guilt without proof. I assume you come from some turd world country where people are presumed guilty
a priori, but that is an immoral stance. You are
wrong to push the narrative that Wings is a pedophile
without proof.
The reason it "keeps piling up" is a simple one: Wings thinks he is 162 IQ instead of 62 IQ and will try to outsmart his trolls through rhetoric instead of outsmarting them through action (more accurately, inaction). We have
proof that Wings says stupid shit without considering the consequences. We have
proof that Wings thinks he's smarter than he really is. We have
proof that Wings defaults to "debates" to try and get his way and we have
proof that he cannot successfully argue his own case against anyone with average intelligence even when he is in the right. We have
proof that Wings uses words he does not know the meaning of. We have
proof that Wings lies often and we have
proof that he thinks hyping up his sexual prowess makes him look cool.
You have every right to suspect that Wings is a pedo because of what he has said. Suspicion alone does not justify pushing your narrative as fact however. As we have seen, the worst trolls continually justify their behavior off of the belief that Wings is a pedophile and not one of the literal dozens of other
proven things that make Wings a prime lolcow.
Continuing to push that narrative without proof will only make things worse until someone actually gets Wings and Kelly shot by some psychopathic vigilante.